From patchwork Wed Jan 25 21:38:06 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ilya Leoshkevich X-Patchwork-Id: 13116271 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99DEFC54E94 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 21:39:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236793AbjAYVjz (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2023 16:39:55 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37374 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236878AbjAYVjv (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2023 16:39:51 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 642B22F783 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 13:39:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 30PKLgl2030687; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 21:39:30 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=n1RzRJHW8EU2+z/I+3e1QrTdAJKXSfBJ7H9uFvtAa14=; b=CxOuyqVsaMBbsnSLVnmr3CWE4g/wMvPmPm2Up1NFsrw4opa+wtdD5zzB/Tq+TuyERrKN y/o09iLrx0JztEv1OoHatwsrqvoBuPhbNsgY7sHWKjUnHeNYw7RXrAswzytv65P21pmV aPF+g7aN43MDT5kbj8XUpNNbHSSYKaloqfHxgjJDovw1l1Q+x1BIK2eC6RTp8SQrehUb QygFG/8h+f5+IUHtdLZzBCiS0c4m4czukQw9DLbDdt65A28SZs9yQAay42uUdkK1kJ8U GL6OFzmW5XKyLc9lQTN1cPCKk8dgPa/Q/BbVWc70nRPeAmVjcNMKhHoB1zVKhm8vrBjo pA== Received: from ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (66.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.102]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3nacg21nyf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 25 Jan 2023 21:39:30 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 30PH3jSn014941; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 21:39:28 GMT Received: from smtprelay01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.227]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3n87afdkx8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 25 Jan 2023 21:39:28 +0000 Received: from smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.106]) by smtprelay01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 30PLdOHr52232534 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 25 Jan 2023 21:39:24 GMT Received: from smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0332004B; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 21:39:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8751220040; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 21:39:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from heavy.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (unknown [9.155.209.149]) by smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 21:39:24 +0000 (GMT) From: Ilya Leoshkevich To: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Ilya Leoshkevich Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 13/24] selftests/bpf: Add a sign-extension test for kfuncs Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 22:38:06 +0100 Message-Id: <20230125213817.1424447-14-iii@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.1 In-Reply-To: <20230125213817.1424447-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> References: <20230125213817.1424447-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: uunGKBPytJEm-2zQCg2x0q6hWivEfup7 X-Proofpoint-GUID: uunGKBPytJEm-2zQCg2x0q6hWivEfup7 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.219,Aquarius:18.0.930,Hydra:6.0.562,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2023-01-25_13,2023-01-25_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=992 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2212070000 definitions=main-2301250193 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net s390x ABI requires the caller to zero- or sign-extend the arguments. eBPF already deals with zero-extension (by definition of its ABI), but not with sign-extension. Add a test to cover that potentially problematic area. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich --- net/bpf/test_run.c | 9 +++++++++ .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c | 1 + .../selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c index 8da0d73b368e..7dbefa4fd2eb 100644 --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c @@ -550,6 +550,14 @@ struct sock * noinline bpf_kfunc_call_test3(struct sock *sk) return sk; } +long noinline bpf_kfunc_call_test4(signed char a, short b, int c, long d) +{ + /* Provoke the compiler to assume that the caller has sign-extended a, + * b and c on platforms where this is required (e.g. s390x). + */ + return (long)a + (long)b + (long)c + d; +} + struct prog_test_member1 { int a; }; @@ -746,6 +754,7 @@ BTF_SET8_START(test_sk_check_kfunc_ids) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test1) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test2) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test3) +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test4) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_memb_acquire, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_release, KF_RELEASE) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c index 5af1ee8f0e6e..bb4cd82a788a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ static struct kfunc_test_params kfunc_tests[] = { /* success cases */ TC_TEST(kfunc_call_test1, 12), TC_TEST(kfunc_call_test2, 3), + TC_TEST(kfunc_call_test4, -1234), TC_TEST(kfunc_call_test_ref_btf_id, 0), TC_TEST(kfunc_call_test_get_mem, 42), SYSCALL_TEST(kfunc_syscall_test, 0), diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c index f636e50be259..d91c58d06d38 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ #include #include +extern long bpf_kfunc_call_test4(signed char a, short b, int c, long d) __ksym; extern int bpf_kfunc_call_test2(struct sock *sk, __u32 a, __u32 b) __ksym; extern __u64 bpf_kfunc_call_test1(struct sock *sk, __u32 a, __u64 b, __u32 c, __u64 d) __ksym; @@ -17,6 +18,23 @@ extern void bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_fail2(__u64 *mem, int len) __ksym; extern int *bpf_kfunc_call_test_get_rdwr_mem(struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p, const int rdwr_buf_size) __ksym; extern int *bpf_kfunc_call_test_get_rdonly_mem(struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p, const int rdonly_buf_size) __ksym; +SEC("tc") +int kfunc_call_test4(struct __sk_buff *skb) +{ + struct bpf_sock *sk = skb->sk; + long tmp; + + if (!sk) + return -1; + + sk = bpf_sk_fullsock(sk); + if (!sk) + return -1; + + tmp = bpf_kfunc_call_test4(-3, -30, -200, -1000); + return (tmp >> 32) + tmp; +} + SEC("tc") int kfunc_call_test2(struct __sk_buff *skb) {