Message ID | 20230215095624.1365200-1-leon@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 84cb1b53cdbad52642571e31a8aee301206d2043 |
Headers | show |
Series | [GIT,PULL] Please pull mlx5-next changes | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
netdev/tree_selection | success | Pull request for net-next |
netdev/build_32bit | success | Errors and warnings before: 2 this patch: 2 |
netdev/build_clang | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
netdev/verify_signedoff | success | Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer |
netdev/verify_fixes | success | No Fixes tag |
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn | success | Errors and warnings before: 2 this patch: 2 |
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:56:24 +0200 Leon Romanovsky wrote: > Following previous conversations [1] and our clear commitment to do the TC work [2], > please pull mlx5-next shared branch, which includes low-level steering logic to allow > RoCEv2 traffic to be encrypted/decrypted through IPsec. I wish the assurances could have been given on the list but it is what it is. Pulling to net-next as well, thanks.
Hello: This pull request was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master) by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>: On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:56:24 +0200 you wrote: > Hi Jason, > > Following previous conversations [1] and our clear commitment to do the TC work [2], > please pull mlx5-next shared branch, which includes low-level steering logic to allow > RoCEv2 traffic to be encrypted/decrypted through IPsec. > > Thanks > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [GIT,PULL] Please pull mlx5-next changes https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/84cb1b53cdba You are awesome, thank you!
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 11:37:22AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:56:24 +0200 Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > Following previous conversations [1] and our clear commitment to do the TC work [2], > > please pull mlx5-next shared branch, which includes low-level steering logic to allow > > RoCEv2 traffic to be encrypted/decrypted through IPsec. > > I wish the assurances could have been given on the list but it is > what it is. Pulling to net-next as well, thanks. Thanks a lot.