@@ -176,14 +176,19 @@ static struct dwarf_cu *dwarf_cu__new(struct cu *cu)
return dwarf_cu;
}
+static void unspecified_type__delete(struct cu *cu, struct unspecified_type *utype);
+
static void dwarf_cu__delete(struct cu *cu)
{
if (cu == NULL || cu->priv == NULL)
return;
struct dwarf_cu *dcu = cu->priv;
+ struct list_head *pos, *n;
// dcu->hash_tags & dcu->hash_types are on cu->obstack
+ list_for_each_safe(pos, n, &cu->unspecified_types)
+ unspecified_type__delete(cu, container_of(pos, struct unspecified_type, node));
cu__free(cu, dcu);
cu->priv = NULL;
}
@@ -1449,6 +1454,33 @@ static struct tag *die__create_new_tag(Dwarf_Die *die, struct cu *cu)
return tag;
}
+static struct tag *die__create_new_unspecified_type(Dwarf_Die *die, struct cu *cu,
+ struct conf_load *conf)
+{
+ struct unspecified_type *tag;
+
+ tag = tag__alloc_with_spec(cu, sizeof(struct unspecified_type));
+ if (tag == NULL)
+ return NULL;
+
+ tag__init(&tag->tag, cu, die);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tag->node);
+
+ tag->name = attr_string(die, DW_AT_name, conf);
+
+ list_add(&tag->node, &cu->unspecified_types);
+
+ return &tag->tag;
+}
+
+static void unspecified_type__delete(struct cu *cu, struct unspecified_type *utype)
+{
+ struct dwarf_tag *dtag = utype->tag.priv;
+
+ cu__free(cu, dtag);
+ cu__free(cu, utype);
+}
+
static struct tag *die__create_new_annotated_tag(Dwarf_Die *die, struct cu *cu,
struct conf_load *conf)
{
@@ -2172,10 +2204,10 @@ static struct tag *__die__process_tag(Dwarf_Die *die, struct cu *cu,
case DW_TAG_volatile_type:
case DW_TAG_atomic_type:
tag = die__create_new_tag(die, cu); break;
- case DW_TAG_unspecified_type:
- tag = die__create_new_tag(die, cu); break;
case DW_TAG_pointer_type:
tag = die__create_new_annotated_tag(die, cu, conf); break;
+ case DW_TAG_unspecified_type:
+ tag = die__create_new_unspecified_type(die, cu, conf); break;
case DW_TAG_ptr_to_member_type:
tag = die__create_new_ptr_to_member_type(die, cu); break;
case DW_TAG_enumeration_type:
@@ -681,6 +681,7 @@ struct cu *cu__new(const char *name, uint8_t addr_size,
cu->dfops = NULL;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cu->tags);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cu->tool_list);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cu->unspecified_types);
cu->addr_size = addr_size;
cu->extra_dbg_info = 0;
@@ -242,6 +242,7 @@ struct cu {
struct list_head node;
struct list_head tags;
struct list_head tool_list; /* To be used by tools such as ctracer */
+ struct list_head unspecified_types;
struct ptr_table types_table;
struct ptr_table functions_table;
struct ptr_table tags_table;
@@ -652,6 +653,22 @@ static inline struct llvm_annotation *tag__llvm_annotation(struct tag *tag)
return (struct llvm_annotation *)tag;
}
+/** struct unspecified_type - representation of DW_TAG_unspecified_type.
+ *
+ * @name - DW_AT_name associated with this tag
+ * @node - a node for cu::unspecified_types list
+ */
+struct unspecified_type {
+ struct tag tag;
+ const char *name;
+ struct list_head node;
+};
+
+static inline struct unspecified_type *tag__unspecified_type(struct tag *tag)
+{
+ return (struct unspecified_type *)tag;
+}
+
/** struct namespace - base class for enums, structs, unions, typedefs, etc
*
* @tags - class_member, enumerators, etc
In recent discussion in BPF mailing list ([1]) participants agreed to add a new DWARF representation for "btf_type_tag" annotations. The agreed representation of void pointers uses unspecified types. For example, consider the following C code: struct alpha { void __attribute__((btf_type_tag("__alpha_a"))) *a; } g; And corresponding DWARF: 0x29: DW_TAG_structure_type DW_AT_name ("alpha") 0x2e: DW_TAG_member DW_AT_name ("a") DW_AT_type (0x38 "void *") 0x38: DW_TAG_pointer_type DW_AT_type (0x41 "void") 0x41: DW_TAG_unspecified_type DW_AT_name ("void") 0x43: DW_TAG_LLVM_annotation DW_AT_name ("btf:type_tag") DW_AT_const_value ("__alpha_a") This is a preparatory patch for new type tags representation support, specifically it adds `struct unspecified_type` and a new `cu` field `struct cu::unspecified_types`. These would be used in a subsequent patch to recode type tags attached to DW_TAG_unspecified_type as in the example above. [1] Mailing list discussion regarding `btf:type_tag` Various approaches are discussed, Solution #2 is accepted https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/87r0w9jjoq.fsf@oracle.com/ Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> --- dwarf_loader.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- dwarves.c | 1 + dwarves.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)