diff mbox series

[bpf-next,08/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/basic_stack.c converted to inline assembly

Message ID 20230325025524.144043-9-eddyz87@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 0ccbe4956d6c20fa0a09a72d2033c49f0976ed6c
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series First set of verifier/*.c migrated to inline assembly | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail merge-conflict
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Eduard Zingerman March 25, 2023, 2:54 a.m. UTC 
Test verifier/basic_stack.c automatically converted to use inline assembly.

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c       |   2 +
 .../bpf/progs/verifier_basic_stack.c          | 100 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/verifier/basic_stack.c      |  64 -----------
 3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_basic_stack.c
 delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic_stack.c
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
index 60eb0f38ed92..95a3151db052 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ 
 #include "cap_helpers.h"
 #include "verifier_and.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_array_access.skel.h"
+#include "verifier_basic_stack.skel.h"
 
 __maybe_unused
 static void run_tests_aux(const char *skel_name, skel_elf_bytes_fn elf_bytes_factory)
@@ -32,3 +33,4 @@  static void run_tests_aux(const char *skel_name, skel_elf_bytes_fn elf_bytes_fac
 
 void test_verifier_and(void)                  { RUN(verifier_and); }
 void test_verifier_array_access(void)         { RUN(verifier_array_access); }
+void test_verifier_basic_stack(void)          { RUN(verifier_basic_stack); }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_basic_stack.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_basic_stack.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..359df865a8f3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_basic_stack.c
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Converted from tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic_stack.c */
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+struct {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
+	__uint(max_entries, 1);
+	__type(key, long long);
+	__type(value, long long);
+} map_hash_8b SEC(".maps");
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("stack out of bounds")
+__failure __msg("invalid write to stack")
+__failure_unpriv
+__naked void stack_out_of_bounds(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r1 = 0;						\
+	*(u64*)(r10 + 8) = r1;				\
+	exit;						\
+"	::: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("uninitialized stack1")
+__failure __msg("invalid indirect read from stack")
+__failure_unpriv
+__naked void uninitialized_stack1(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r2 = r10;					\
+	r2 += -8;					\
+	r1 = %[map_hash_8b] ll;				\
+	call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem];			\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+	  __imm_addr(map_hash_8b)
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("uninitialized stack2")
+__failure __msg("invalid read from stack")
+__failure_unpriv
+__naked void uninitialized_stack2(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r2 = r10;					\
+	r0 = *(u64*)(r2 - 8);				\
+	exit;						\
+"	::: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("invalid fp arithmetic")
+__failure __msg("R1 subtraction from stack pointer")
+__failure_unpriv
+__naked void invalid_fp_arithmetic(void)
+{
+	/* If this gets ever changed, make sure JITs can deal with it. */
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r0 = 0;						\
+	r1 = r10;					\
+	r1 -= 8;					\
+	*(u64*)(r1 + 0) = r0;				\
+	exit;						\
+"	::: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("non-invalid fp arithmetic")
+__success __success_unpriv __retval(0)
+__naked void non_invalid_fp_arithmetic(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r0 = 0;						\
+	*(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r0;				\
+	exit;						\
+"	::: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("misaligned read from stack")
+__failure __msg("misaligned stack access")
+__failure_unpriv
+__naked void misaligned_read_from_stack(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r2 = r10;					\
+	r0 = *(u64*)(r2 - 4);				\
+	exit;						\
+"	::: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic_stack.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic_stack.c
deleted file mode 100644
index f995777dddb3..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic_stack.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,64 +0,0 @@ 
-{
-	"stack out of bounds",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, 8, 0),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.errstr = "invalid write to stack",
-	.result = REJECT,
-},
-{
-	"uninitialized stack1",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
-	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
-	BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
-	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 2 },
-	.errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack",
-	.result = REJECT,
-},
-{
-	"uninitialized stack2",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, -8),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.errstr = "invalid read from stack",
-	.result = REJECT,
-},
-{
-	"invalid fp arithmetic",
-	/* If this gets ever changed, make sure JITs can deal with it. */
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
-	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
-	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_1, 8),
-	BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.errstr = "R1 subtraction from stack pointer",
-	.result = REJECT,
-},
-{
-	"non-invalid fp arithmetic",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
-	BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_0, -8),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.result = ACCEPT,
-},
-{
-	"misaligned read from stack",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, -4),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.errstr = "misaligned stack access",
-	.result = REJECT,
-},