diff mbox series

[v2,bpf-next,8/9] bpf: Centralize btf_field-specific initialization logic

Message ID 20230415201811.343116-9-davemarchevsky@fb.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 3e81740a90626024a9d9c6f9bfa3d36204dafefb
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series Shared ownership for local kptrs | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 fail Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 fail Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 1466 this patch: 1466
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 8 maintainers not CCed: song@kernel.org sdf@google.com haoluo@google.com yhs@fb.com john.fastabend@gmail.com kpsingh@kernel.org jolsa@kernel.org martin.lau@linux.dev
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 164 this patch: 164
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 1460 this patch: 1460
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: line length of 81 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Dave Marchevsky April 15, 2023, 8:18 p.m. UTC
All btf_fields in an object are 0-initialized by memset in
bpf_obj_init. This might not be a valid initial state for some field
types, in which case kfuncs that use the type will properly initialize
their input if it's been 0-initialized. Some BPF graph collection types
and kfuncs do this: bpf_list_{head,node} and bpf_rb_node.

An earlier patch in this series added the bpf_refcount field, for which
the 0 state indicates that the refcounted object should be free'd.
bpf_obj_init treats this field specially, setting refcount to 1 instead
of relying on scattered "refcount is 0? Must have just been initialized,
let's set to 1" logic in kfuncs.

This patch extends this treatment to list and rbtree field types,
allowing most scattered initialization logic in kfuncs to be removed.

Note that bpf_{list_head,rb_root} may be inside a BPF map, in which case
they'll be 0-initialized without passing through the newly-added logic,
so scattered initialization logic must remain for these collection root
types.

Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h  | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 14 ++++++--------
 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index b065de2cfcea..18b592fde896 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -355,6 +355,34 @@  static inline u32 btf_field_type_align(enum btf_field_type type)
 	}
 }
 
+static inline void bpf_obj_init_field(const struct btf_field *field, void *addr)
+{
+	memset(addr, 0, field->size);
+
+	switch (field->type) {
+	case BPF_REFCOUNT:
+		refcount_set((refcount_t *)addr, 1);
+		break;
+	case BPF_RB_NODE:
+		RB_CLEAR_NODE((struct rb_node *)addr);
+		break;
+	case BPF_LIST_HEAD:
+	case BPF_LIST_NODE:
+		INIT_LIST_HEAD((struct list_head *)addr);
+		break;
+	case BPF_RB_ROOT:
+		/* RB_ROOT_CACHED 0-inits, no need to do anything after memset */
+	case BPF_SPIN_LOCK:
+	case BPF_TIMER:
+	case BPF_KPTR_UNREF:
+	case BPF_KPTR_REF:
+		break;
+	default:
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+		return;
+	}
+}
+
 static inline bool btf_record_has_field(const struct btf_record *rec, enum btf_field_type type)
 {
 	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rec))
@@ -369,10 +397,7 @@  static inline void bpf_obj_init(const struct btf_record *rec, void *obj)
 	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rec))
 		return;
 	for (i = 0; i < rec->cnt; i++)
-		memset(obj + rec->fields[i].offset, 0, rec->fields[i].size);
-
-	if (rec->refcount_off >= 0)
-		refcount_set((refcount_t *)(obj + rec->refcount_off), 1);
+		bpf_obj_init_field(&rec->fields[i], obj + rec->fields[i].offset);
 }
 
 /* 'dst' must be a temporary buffer and should not point to memory that is being
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index 1835df333287..00e5fb0682ac 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -1936,10 +1936,11 @@  static int __bpf_list_add(struct bpf_list_node *node, struct bpf_list_head *head
 {
 	struct list_head *n = (void *)node, *h = (void *)head;
 
+	/* If list_head was 0-initialized by map, bpf_obj_init_field wasn't
+	 * called on its fields, so init here
+	 */
 	if (unlikely(!h->next))
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(h);
-	if (unlikely(!n->next))
-		INIT_LIST_HEAD(n);
 	if (!list_empty(n)) {
 		/* Only called from BPF prog, no need to migrate_disable */
 		__bpf_obj_drop_impl(n - off, rec);
@@ -1975,6 +1976,9 @@  static struct bpf_list_node *__bpf_list_del(struct bpf_list_head *head, bool tai
 {
 	struct list_head *n, *h = (void *)head;
 
+	/* If list_head was 0-initialized by map, bpf_obj_init_field wasn't
+	 * called on its fields, so init here
+	 */
 	if (unlikely(!h->next))
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(h);
 	if (list_empty(h))
@@ -2000,9 +2004,6 @@  __bpf_kfunc struct bpf_rb_node *bpf_rbtree_remove(struct bpf_rb_root *root,
 	struct rb_root_cached *r = (struct rb_root_cached *)root;
 	struct rb_node *n = (struct rb_node *)node;
 
-	if (!n->__rb_parent_color)
-		RB_CLEAR_NODE(n);
-
 	if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(n))
 		return NULL;
 
@@ -2022,9 +2023,6 @@  static int __bpf_rbtree_add(struct bpf_rb_root *root, struct bpf_rb_node *node,
 	bpf_callback_t cb = (bpf_callback_t)less;
 	bool leftmost = true;
 
-	if (!n->__rb_parent_color)
-		RB_CLEAR_NODE(n);
-
 	if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE(n)) {
 		/* Only called from BPF prog, no need to migrate_disable */
 		__bpf_obj_drop_impl(n - off, rec);