From patchwork Mon Jun 26 08:58:09 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Puranjay Mohan X-Patchwork-Id: 13292522 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7781F46BD for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2023 08:58:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com (mail-wr1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::435]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF2742720; Mon, 26 Jun 2023 01:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-311367a3e12so4213471f8f.2; Mon, 26 Jun 2023 01:58:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1687769893; x=1690361893; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=VXoqBJ5SjwaazwPupYLAmCHlcx6sG+m6SwqgWeDfHJg=; b=g4dDFsuLrP/kq6wjidgxCVSZBWexLlLfzozRLHF4rlKHxPrUkNxO67SrjoZCrESpdQ aJ2Cmd5YUbLlw8pzUsKV6d7mq6F1Ezl61pbT7nLBjfXhrL7kiOO05uDTYYlz5VKc6TKz MIjAcqUe2Qlu1VdxLUEhJ2h7eT1qJwLnfYQoUR00XBFUGz6TMBWsQ88/JJWSYusRGkB4 +nFCOiA2zsix3xJzeq14eqep7tG8m21EwDS4MGMT272sTncmfoSbKv6FAjcrd9TK2hYB cU+gfQIrPje7lhB+A4xggWp9smrQ992zaJaUmEBTjsCfRhJayX+epU8BfX6jsLbdC2VW LPFw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687769893; x=1690361893; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=VXoqBJ5SjwaazwPupYLAmCHlcx6sG+m6SwqgWeDfHJg=; b=Pq0gZeFyUY01vZnul3B/+kqlL2Wh5giRE0zOYIDTGRECD7ln4T6GhpmOSU6+5GMDj5 c4mDkzuP0owIrUqYpW7aereLXnEr2XtmSaw594gxyhaEcsHJxPfzYzy1i8SZWkO+Cxir ZfECj7R+i6voezIuLW44qxA+bWW8Hw9QT5Vmt/ZBLAetGEaWr4A7o/A7NzrFoFzfXrvj kD3oWr7DNrCOLFJMibWOUyadn5d2xnxS4LxWrNM+dHcPjfKFYjjUJ41Mc/qHm/cpUV8n icdikSrt2cxPNmcupsAQeN7SL0EimkMeRDwAjo4OEw4/KiLF1tsxWZqH5qIQ3IxRLBJw 2hDA== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxxo4fZJCRgJN7JdEacDNpZG4VKByvMYiswYQGNQIaZWsGBPFJH avvj30hI5NwR/H2sssbxGpc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5Amc/Osho99Kkutqafky4CNCXZK+MTntk6OuGOjVXPalxm7R230LqvZchQ4XpX7VlwKr3csQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:480c:0:b0:309:3e77:6cac with SMTP id l12-20020a5d480c000000b003093e776cacmr24739369wrq.0.1687769893315; Mon, 26 Jun 2023 01:58:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ip-172-31-22-112.eu-west-1.compute.internal (ec2-34-242-96-229.eu-west-1.compute.amazonaws.com. [34.242.96.229]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h10-20020a5d504a000000b00313e8dc7facsm4883533wrt.116.2023.06.26.01.58.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 26 Jun 2023 01:58:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Puranjay Mohan To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, kpsingh@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: puranjay12@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/3] bpf: make bpf_prog_pack allocator portable Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 08:58:09 +0000 Message-Id: <20230626085811.3192402-2-puranjay12@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.40.1 In-Reply-To: <20230626085811.3192402-1-puranjay12@gmail.com> References: <20230626085811.3192402-1-puranjay12@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net The bpf_prog_pack allocator currently uses module_alloc() and module_memfree() to allocate and free memory. This is not portable because different architectures use different methods for allocating memory for BPF programs. Like ARM64 uses vmalloc()/vfree(). Use bpf_jit_alloc_exec() and bpf_jit_free_exec() for memory management in bpf_prog_pack allocator. Other architectures can override these with their implementation and will be able to use bpf_prog_pack directly. Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan Acked-by: Song Liu --- Changes in V3 => v4 - No changes Changes in V2 => V3: - No changes Changes in v1 => v2: - No code changes. - Added Acked-by: Song Liu kernel/bpf/core.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c index dc85240a0134..599136cb5096 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c @@ -860,7 +860,7 @@ static struct bpf_prog_pack *alloc_new_pack(bpf_jit_fill_hole_t bpf_fill_ill_ins GFP_KERNEL); if (!pack) return NULL; - pack->ptr = module_alloc(BPF_PROG_PACK_SIZE); + pack->ptr = bpf_jit_alloc_exec(BPF_PROG_PACK_SIZE); if (!pack->ptr) { kfree(pack); return NULL; @@ -884,7 +884,7 @@ void *bpf_prog_pack_alloc(u32 size, bpf_jit_fill_hole_t bpf_fill_ill_insns) mutex_lock(&pack_mutex); if (size > BPF_PROG_PACK_SIZE) { size = round_up(size, PAGE_SIZE); - ptr = module_alloc(size); + ptr = bpf_jit_alloc_exec(size); if (ptr) { bpf_fill_ill_insns(ptr, size); set_vm_flush_reset_perms(ptr); @@ -922,7 +922,7 @@ void bpf_prog_pack_free(struct bpf_binary_header *hdr) mutex_lock(&pack_mutex); if (hdr->size > BPF_PROG_PACK_SIZE) { - module_memfree(hdr); + bpf_jit_free_exec(hdr); goto out; } @@ -946,7 +946,7 @@ void bpf_prog_pack_free(struct bpf_binary_header *hdr) if (bitmap_find_next_zero_area(pack->bitmap, BPF_PROG_CHUNK_COUNT, 0, BPF_PROG_CHUNK_COUNT, 0) == 0) { list_del(&pack->list); - module_memfree(pack->ptr); + bpf_jit_free_exec(pack->ptr); kfree(pack); } out: