diff mbox series

[bpf-next,1/2] selftests/bpf: Add F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS to some tests

Message ID 20230705113926.751791-2-bjorn@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series BPF kselftest cross-build/RISC-V fixes | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 14 maintainers not CCed: palmer@dabbelt.com void@manifault.com yhs@fb.com kpsingh@kernel.org martin.lau@linux.dev john.fastabend@gmail.com sdf@google.com aou@eecs.berkeley.edu shuah@kernel.org song@kernel.org tj@kernel.org jolsa@kernel.org haoluo@google.com paul.walmsley@sifive.com
netdev/build_clang fail Errors and warnings before: 21 this patch: 20
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 pending Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc

Commit Message

Björn Töpel July 5, 2023, 11:39 a.m. UTC 
From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>

Some verifier tests were missing F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
which made the test fail. Add the flag where needed.

Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c | 1 +
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_skb.c        | 2 ++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jmp32.c          | 8 ++++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_kptr.c       | 2 ++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c        | 2 +-
 5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c
index b39665f33524..319337bdcfc8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c
@@ -242,4 +242,5 @@ 
 	.result = REJECT,
 	.errstr = "R0 invalid mem access",
 	.errstr_unpriv = "R10 partial copy of pointer",
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_skb.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_skb.c
index 83cecfbd6739..0b394a7f7a2d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_skb.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_skb.c
@@ -1169,6 +1169,7 @@ 
        },
        .result = ACCEPT,
        .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
+       .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
        "pkt_end < pkt taken check",
@@ -1190,4 +1191,5 @@ 
        },
        .result = ACCEPT,
        .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
+       .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jmp32.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jmp32.c
index 1a27a6210554..43776f6f92f4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jmp32.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jmp32.c
@@ -290,6 +290,7 @@ 
 	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.retval = 2,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jgt32: BPF_K",
@@ -360,6 +361,7 @@ 
 	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.retval = 2,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jle32: BPF_K",
@@ -430,6 +432,7 @@ 
 	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.retval = 2,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jlt32: BPF_K",
@@ -500,6 +503,7 @@ 
 	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.retval = 2,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jsge32: BPF_K",
@@ -570,6 +574,7 @@ 
 	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.retval = 2,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jsgt32: BPF_K",
@@ -640,6 +645,7 @@ 
 	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.retval = 2,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jsle32: BPF_K",
@@ -710,6 +716,7 @@ 
 	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.retval = 2,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jslt32: BPF_K",
@@ -780,6 +787,7 @@ 
 	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.retval = 2,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jgt32: range bound deduction, reg op imm",
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_kptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_kptr.c
index a0cfc06d75bc..d25c3e9605f1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_kptr.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_kptr.c
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ 
 	.fixup_map_kptr = { 1 },
 	.result = REJECT,
 	.errstr = "kptr access cannot have variable offset",
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"map_kptr: bpf_kptr_xchg non-const var_off",
@@ -121,6 +122,7 @@ 
 	.fixup_map_kptr = { 1 },
 	.result = REJECT,
 	.errstr = "kptr access misaligned expected=0 off=7",
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"map_kptr: reject var_off != 0",
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c
index 99272bb890da..0d84dd1f38b6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ 
 	},
 	.fixup_map_ringbuf = { 1 },
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
-	.flags = BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ,
+	.flags = BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ | F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 	.errstr = "invalid access to memory, mem_size=1 off=42 size=8",
 	.result = REJECT,
 },