From patchwork Wed Jul 5 11:39:25 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?b?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= X-Patchwork-Id: 13301978 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8800F6FD9; Wed, 5 Jul 2023 11:39:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E51ADC433CB; Wed, 5 Jul 2023 11:39:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1688557176; bh=D9GSPkQfc94GriKvN2wgHJNIn0GmarOpfbjlVuo819E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HWeLHX7vKcTK8N/9e06kxAsab5MXoraEbcbl0s3fZDnuBtZvseV7oVFGFgNokb+IX W6me0ElJ8VTA+sISXMjGJdL2P1XES2lNIMSCgBKFf/FaMYI9+1gxbCNm3F/qb/4yT4 h/KnNT2meDWnCn5LTRykO894s/hJGeSm0O/gAiBEu9CvnvaBC6az1Pv+wVWN2zJH6a wficjpMq8Fr+vdOi6CL1Xu5KpoYfcadmabSQah05ZwQlj2eqcHLneZDvYrftW5Rmqn FBIWh0c5Te4bOed4KmnlwC0qB20X9D52cMWPsEId/O2fDGAKAK6mXCpF7xNKqBrvvR tSgdL5f73aTfw== From: =?utf-8?b?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= To: Andrii Nakryiko , Mykola Lysenko , bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: =?utf-8?b?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] selftests/bpf: Add F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS to some tests Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 13:39:25 +0200 Message-Id: <20230705113926.751791-2-bjorn@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20230705113926.751791-1-bjorn@kernel.org> References: <20230705113926.751791-1-bjorn@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net From: Björn Töpel Some verifier tests were missing F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, which made the test fail. Add the flag where needed. Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_skb.c | 2 ++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jmp32.c | 8 ++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_kptr.c | 2 ++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c | 2 +- 5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c index b39665f33524..319337bdcfc8 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c @@ -242,4 +242,5 @@ .result = REJECT, .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access", .errstr_unpriv = "R10 partial copy of pointer", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_skb.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_skb.c index 83cecfbd6739..0b394a7f7a2d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_skb.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_skb.c @@ -1169,6 +1169,7 @@ }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "pkt_end < pkt taken check", @@ -1190,4 +1191,5 @@ }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jmp32.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jmp32.c index 1a27a6210554..43776f6f92f4 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jmp32.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jmp32.c @@ -290,6 +290,7 @@ .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "jgt32: BPF_K", @@ -360,6 +361,7 @@ .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "jle32: BPF_K", @@ -430,6 +432,7 @@ .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "jlt32: BPF_K", @@ -500,6 +503,7 @@ .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "jsge32: BPF_K", @@ -570,6 +574,7 @@ .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "jsgt32: BPF_K", @@ -640,6 +645,7 @@ .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "jsle32: BPF_K", @@ -710,6 +716,7 @@ .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "jslt32: BPF_K", @@ -780,6 +787,7 @@ .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "jgt32: range bound deduction, reg op imm", diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_kptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_kptr.c index a0cfc06d75bc..d25c3e9605f1 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_kptr.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_kptr.c @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ .fixup_map_kptr = { 1 }, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "kptr access cannot have variable offset", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "map_kptr: bpf_kptr_xchg non-const var_off", @@ -121,6 +122,7 @@ .fixup_map_kptr = { 1 }, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "kptr access misaligned expected=0 off=7", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "map_kptr: reject var_off != 0", diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c index 99272bb890da..0d84dd1f38b6 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ }, .fixup_map_ringbuf = { 1 }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, - .flags = BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ, + .flags = BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ | F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, .errstr = "invalid access to memory, mem_size=1 off=42 size=8", .result = REJECT, },