@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ static const struct smcd_ops ism_ops;
static struct ism_client *clients[MAX_CLIENTS]; /* use an array rather than */
/* a list for fast mapping */
static u8 max_client;
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(clients_lock);
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(clients_lock);
struct ism_dev_list {
struct list_head list;
struct mutex mutex; /* protects ism device list */
@@ -59,11 +59,10 @@ static void ism_setup_forwarding(struct ism_client *client, struct ism_dev *ism)
int ism_register_client(struct ism_client *client)
{
struct ism_dev *ism;
- unsigned long flags;
int i, rc = -ENOSPC;
mutex_lock(&ism_dev_list.mutex);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&clients_lock, flags);
+ mutex_lock(&clients_lock);
for (i = 0; i < MAX_CLIENTS; ++i) {
if (!clients[i]) {
clients[i] = client;
@@ -74,7 +73,8 @@ int ism_register_client(struct ism_client *client)
break;
}
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&clients_lock, flags);
+ mutex_unlock(&clients_lock);
+
if (i < MAX_CLIENTS) {
/* initialize with all devices that we got so far */
list_for_each_entry(ism, &ism_dev_list.list, list) {
@@ -96,11 +96,11 @@ int ism_unregister_client(struct ism_client *client)
int rc = 0;
mutex_lock(&ism_dev_list.mutex);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&clients_lock, flags);
+ mutex_lock(&clients_lock);
clients[client->id] = NULL;
if (client->id + 1 == max_client)
max_client--;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&clients_lock, flags);
+ mutex_unlock(&clients_lock);
list_for_each_entry(ism, &ism_dev_list.list, list) {
spin_lock_irqsave(&ism->lock, flags);
/* Stop forwarding IRQs and events */
@@ -571,21 +571,9 @@ static u64 ism_get_local_gid(struct ism_dev *ism)
return ism->local_gid;
}
-static void ism_dev_add_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
-{
- struct ism_client *client = container_of(work, struct ism_client,
- add_work);
-
- client->add(client->tgt_ism);
- ism_setup_forwarding(client, client->tgt_ism);
- atomic_dec(&client->tgt_ism->add_dev_cnt);
- wake_up(&client->tgt_ism->waitq);
-}
-
static int ism_dev_init(struct ism_dev *ism)
{
struct pci_dev *pdev = ism->pdev;
- unsigned long flags;
int i, ret;
ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, 1, 1, PCI_IRQ_MSI);
@@ -618,25 +606,16 @@ static int ism_dev_init(struct ism_dev *ism)
/* hardware is V2 capable */
ism_create_system_eid();
- init_waitqueue_head(&ism->waitq);
- atomic_set(&ism->free_clients_cnt, 0);
- atomic_set(&ism->add_dev_cnt, 0);
-
- wait_event(ism->waitq, !atomic_read(&ism->add_dev_cnt));
- spin_lock_irqsave(&clients_lock, flags);
- for (i = 0; i < max_client; ++i)
- if (clients[i]) {
- INIT_WORK(&clients[i]->add_work,
- ism_dev_add_work_func);
- clients[i]->tgt_ism = ism;
- atomic_inc(&ism->add_dev_cnt);
- schedule_work(&clients[i]->add_work);
- }
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&clients_lock, flags);
-
- wait_event(ism->waitq, !atomic_read(&ism->add_dev_cnt));
-
mutex_lock(&ism_dev_list.mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&clients_lock);
+ for (i = 0; i < max_client; ++i) {
+ if (clients[i]) {
+ clients[i]->add(ism);
+ ism_setup_forwarding(clients[i], ism);
+ }
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&clients_lock);
+
list_add(&ism->list, &ism_dev_list.list);
mutex_unlock(&ism_dev_list.mutex);
@@ -711,40 +690,24 @@ static int ism_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
return ret;
}
-static void ism_dev_remove_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
-{
- struct ism_client *client = container_of(work, struct ism_client,
- remove_work);
- unsigned long flags;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&client->tgt_ism->lock, flags);
- client->tgt_ism->subs[client->id] = NULL;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&client->tgt_ism->lock, flags);
- client->remove(client->tgt_ism);
- atomic_dec(&client->tgt_ism->free_clients_cnt);
- wake_up(&client->tgt_ism->waitq);
-}
-
-/* Callers must hold ism_dev_list.mutex */
static void ism_dev_exit(struct ism_dev *ism)
{
struct pci_dev *pdev = ism->pdev;
unsigned long flags;
int i;
- wait_event(ism->waitq, !atomic_read(&ism->free_clients_cnt));
- spin_lock_irqsave(&clients_lock, flags);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&ism->lock, flags);
for (i = 0; i < max_client; ++i)
- if (clients[i]) {
- INIT_WORK(&clients[i]->remove_work,
- ism_dev_remove_work_func);
- clients[i]->tgt_ism = ism;
- atomic_inc(&ism->free_clients_cnt);
- schedule_work(&clients[i]->remove_work);
- }
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&clients_lock, flags);
+ ism->subs[i] = NULL;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ism->lock, flags);
- wait_event(ism->waitq, !atomic_read(&ism->free_clients_cnt));
+ mutex_lock(&ism_dev_list.mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&clients_lock);
+ for (i = 0; i < max_client; ++i) {
+ if (clients[i])
+ clients[i]->remove(ism);
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&clients_lock);
if (SYSTEM_EID.serial_number[0] != '0' ||
SYSTEM_EID.type[0] != '0')
@@ -755,15 +718,14 @@ static void ism_dev_exit(struct ism_dev *ism)
kfree(ism->sba_client_arr);
pci_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
list_del_init(&ism->list);
+ mutex_unlock(&ism_dev_list.mutex);
}
static void ism_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
struct ism_dev *ism = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
- mutex_lock(&ism_dev_list.mutex);
ism_dev_exit(ism);
- mutex_unlock(&ism_dev_list.mutex);
pci_release_mem_regions(pdev);
pci_disable_device(pdev);
@@ -45,9 +45,6 @@ struct ism_dev {
int ieq_idx;
struct ism_client *subs[MAX_CLIENTS];
- atomic_t free_clients_cnt;
- atomic_t add_dev_cnt;
- wait_queue_head_t waitq;
};
struct ism_event {
@@ -69,9 +66,6 @@ struct ism_client {
*/
void (*handle_irq)(struct ism_dev *dev, unsigned int bit, u16 dmbemask);
/* Private area - don't touch! */
- struct work_struct remove_work;
- struct work_struct add_work;
- struct ism_dev *tgt_ism;
u8 id;
};
Previously the clients_lock was protecting the clients array against concurrent addition/removal of clients but was also accessed from IRQ context. This meant that it had to be a spinlock and that the add() and remove() callbacks in which clients need to do allocation and take mutexes can't be called under the clients_lock. To work around this these callbacks were moved to workqueues. This not only introduced significant complexity but is also subtly broken in at least one way. In ism_dev_init() and ism_dev_exit() clients[i]->tgt_ism is used to communicate the added/removed ISM device to the work function. While write access to client[i]->tgt_ism is protected by the clients_lock and the code waits that there is no pending add/remove work before and after setting clients[i]->tgt_ism this is not enough. The problem is that the wait happens based on per ISM device counters. Thus a concurrent ism_dev_init()/ism_dev_exit() for a different ISM device may overwrite a clients[i]->tgt_ism between unlocking the clients_lock and the subsequent wait for the work to finnish. Thankfully with the clients_lock no longer held in IRQ context it can be turned into a mutex which can be held during the calls to add()/remove() completely removing the need for the workqueues and the associated broken housekeeping including the per ISM device counters and the clients[i]->tgt_ism. Fixes: 89e7d2ba61b7 ("net/ism: Add new API for client registration") Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com> --- drivers/s390/net/ism_drv.c | 90 +++++++++++--------------------------- include/linux/ism.h | 6 --- 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)