From patchwork Tue Jul 11 17:59:41 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Dave Marchevsky X-Patchwork-Id: 13309295 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07FAC1EA64 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 18:00:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com (mx0b-00082601.pphosted.com [67.231.153.30]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 455C0170A for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 11:00:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0089730.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0089730.ppops.net (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 36BHhCQM028576 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 11:00:05 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fb.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type; s=facebook; bh=z7auqaZqV4RiCPjFSEs/W2fKT8JPGcSpdjN2yGznVaI=; b=mnskyRFwzfxGpYn+uMRSBz8wBq4KNOmIHYu1xzyYO9BkEvTtyRS/DuvGoIxXpKJFWmVn QFlS2uhXjzuE0cA8rT78TOy9Iy8/ZmkAoizrz+6INKw5N6l+mZQFHbvlinTwND2k59nh uyJsYpAbm+QjmlIcstZwplyI6pSF0tPfYus= Received: from maileast.thefacebook.com ([163.114.130.16]) by m0089730.ppops.net (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3rrtjnfhpu-9 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 11:00:05 -0700 Received: from twshared52232.38.frc1.facebook.com (2620:10d:c0a8:1b::2d) by mail.thefacebook.com (2620:10d:c0a8:82::c) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.23; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 10:59:59 -0700 Received: by devbig077.ldc1.facebook.com (Postfix, from userid 158236) id 2DA2E20EAEEC0; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 10:59:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Dave Marchevsky To: CC: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Kernel Team , Dave Marchevsky Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/6] bpf: Introduce internal definitions for UAPI-opaque bpf_{rb,list}_node Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 10:59:41 -0700 Message-ID: <20230711175945.3298231-3-davemarchevsky@fb.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20230711175945.3298231-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com> References: <20230711175945.3298231-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-FB-Internal: Safe X-Proofpoint-GUID: YhI90VodUUhLpxGU_h1X14_ug71lGC1L X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: YhI90VodUUhLpxGU_h1X14_ug71lGC1L X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.254,Aquarius:18.0.957,Hydra:6.0.591,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2023-07-11_10,2023-07-11_01,2023-05-22_02 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Structs bpf_rb_node and bpf_list_node are opaquely defined in uapi/linux/bpf.h, as BPF program writers are not expected to touch their fields - nor does the verifier allow them to do so. Currently these structs are simple wrappers around structs rb_node and list_head and linked_list / rbtree implementation just casts and passes to library functions for those data structures. Later patches in this series, though, will add an "owner" field to bpf_{rb,list}_node, such that they're not just wrapping an underlying node type. Moreover, the bpf linked_list and rbtree implementations will deal with these owner pointers directly in a few different places. To avoid having to do void *owner = (void*)bpf_list_node + sizeof(struct list_head) with opaque UAPI node types, add bpf_{list,rb}_node_internal struct definitions to internal headers and modify linked_list and rbtree to use the internal types where appropriate. Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky --- include/linux/bpf.h | 10 ++++++++++ kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 23 +++++++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h index 360433f14496..d5841059fd2f 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h @@ -228,6 +228,16 @@ struct btf_record { struct btf_field fields[]; }; +/* Non-opaque version of bpf_rb_node in uapi/linux/bpf.h */ +struct bpf_rb_node_internal { + struct rb_node rb_node; +} __attribute__((aligned(8))); + +/* Non-opaque version of bpf_list_node in uapi/linux/bpf.h */ +struct bpf_list_node_internal { + struct list_head list_head; +} __attribute__((aligned(8))); + struct bpf_map { /* The first two cachelines with read-mostly members of which some * are also accessed in fast-path (e.g. ops, max_entries). diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c index 9e80efa59a5d..f059adefbe82 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c @@ -1942,10 +1942,11 @@ __bpf_kfunc void *bpf_refcount_acquire_impl(void *p__refcounted_kptr, void *meta return (void *)p__refcounted_kptr; } -static int __bpf_list_add(struct bpf_list_node *node, struct bpf_list_head *head, +static int __bpf_list_add(struct bpf_list_node_internal *node, + struct bpf_list_head *head, bool tail, struct btf_record *rec, u64 off) { - struct list_head *n = (void *)node, *h = (void *)head; + struct list_head *n = &node->list_head, *h = (void *)head; /* If list_head was 0-initialized by map, bpf_obj_init_field wasn't * called on its fields, so init here @@ -1967,20 +1968,20 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_list_push_front_impl(struct bpf_list_head *head, struct bpf_list_node *node, void *meta__ign, u64 off) { + struct bpf_list_node_internal *n = (void *)node; struct btf_struct_meta *meta = meta__ign; - return __bpf_list_add(node, head, false, - meta ? meta->record : NULL, off); + return __bpf_list_add(n, head, false, meta ? meta->record : NULL, off); } __bpf_kfunc int bpf_list_push_back_impl(struct bpf_list_head *head, struct bpf_list_node *node, void *meta__ign, u64 off) { + struct bpf_list_node_internal *n = (void *)node; struct btf_struct_meta *meta = meta__ign; - return __bpf_list_add(node, head, true, - meta ? meta->record : NULL, off); + return __bpf_list_add(n, head, true, meta ? meta->record : NULL, off); } static struct bpf_list_node *__bpf_list_del(struct bpf_list_head *head, bool tail) @@ -2013,7 +2014,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc struct bpf_rb_node *bpf_rbtree_remove(struct bpf_rb_root *root, struct bpf_rb_node *node) { struct rb_root_cached *r = (struct rb_root_cached *)root; - struct rb_node *n = (struct rb_node *)node; + struct rb_node *n = &((struct bpf_rb_node_internal *)node)->rb_node; if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(n)) return NULL; @@ -2026,11 +2027,12 @@ __bpf_kfunc struct bpf_rb_node *bpf_rbtree_remove(struct bpf_rb_root *root, /* Need to copy rbtree_add_cached's logic here because our 'less' is a BPF * program */ -static int __bpf_rbtree_add(struct bpf_rb_root *root, struct bpf_rb_node *node, +static int __bpf_rbtree_add(struct bpf_rb_root *root, + struct bpf_rb_node_internal *node, void *less, struct btf_record *rec, u64 off) { struct rb_node **link = &((struct rb_root_cached *)root)->rb_root.rb_node; - struct rb_node *parent = NULL, *n = (struct rb_node *)node; + struct rb_node *parent = NULL, *n = &node->rb_node; bpf_callback_t cb = (bpf_callback_t)less; bool leftmost = true; @@ -2060,8 +2062,9 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_rbtree_add_impl(struct bpf_rb_root *root, struct bpf_rb_node void *meta__ign, u64 off) { struct btf_struct_meta *meta = meta__ign; + struct bpf_rb_node_internal *n = (void *)node; - return __bpf_rbtree_add(root, node, (void *)less, meta ? meta->record : NULL, off); + return __bpf_rbtree_add(root, n, (void *)less, meta ? meta->record : NULL, off); } __bpf_kfunc struct bpf_rb_node *bpf_rbtree_first(struct bpf_rb_root *root)