diff mbox series

[bpf,v1,3/3] selftests/bpf: Add more tests for check_max_stack_depth bug

Message ID 20230713003118.1327943-4-memxor@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series Two more fixes for check_max_stack_depth | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-PR success PR summary
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag present in non-next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 10 maintainers not CCed: yhs@fb.com kpsingh@kernel.org john.fastabend@gmail.com song@kernel.org sdf@google.com shuah@kernel.org mykolal@fb.com linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org jolsa@kernel.org haoluo@google.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: Prefer noinline over __attribute__((noinline)) WARNING: Use of volatile is usually wrong: see Documentation/process/volatile-considered-harmful.rst
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-6 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-29 success Logs for veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi July 13, 2023, 12:31 a.m. UTC 
Another test which now exercies the path of the verifier where it will
explore call chains rooted at the async callback. Without the prior
fixes, this program loads successfully, which is incorrect.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/async_stack_depth.c   | 25 +++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/async_stack_depth.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/async_stack_depth.c
index 477ba950bb43..3517c0e01206 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/async_stack_depth.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/async_stack_depth.c
@@ -22,9 +22,16 @@  static int timer_cb(void *map, int *key, struct bpf_timer *timer)
 	return buf[69];
 }
 
+__attribute__((noinline))
+static int bad_timer_cb(void *map, int *key, struct bpf_timer *timer)
+{
+	volatile char buf[300] = {};
+	return buf[255] + timer_cb(NULL, NULL, NULL);
+}
+
 SEC("tc")
-__failure __msg("combined stack size of 2 calls")
-int prog(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+__failure __msg("combined stack size of 2 calls is 576. Too large")
+int pseudo_call_check(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
 {
 	struct hmap_elem *elem;
 	volatile char buf[256] = {};
@@ -37,4 +44,18 @@  int prog(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
 	return bpf_timer_set_callback(&elem->timer, timer_cb) + buf[0];
 }
 
+SEC("tc")
+__failure __msg("combined stack size of 2 calls is 608. Too large")
+int async_call_root_check(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+	struct hmap_elem *elem;
+	volatile char buf[256] = {};
+
+	elem = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&hmap, &(int){0});
+	if (!elem)
+		return 0;
+
+	return bpf_timer_set_callback(&elem->timer, bad_timer_cb) + buf[0];
+}
+
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";