Message ID | 20230730085905.3420811-2-AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | vsock/virtio/vhost: MSG_ZEROCOPY preparations | expand |
On Sun, 2023-07-30 at 11:59 +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: > This is preparation patch for MSG_ZEROCOPY support. It adds handling of > non-linear skbs by replacing direct calls of 'memcpy_to_msg()' with > 'skb_copy_datagram_iter()'. Main advantage of the second one is that it > can handle paged part of the skb by using 'kmap()' on each page, but if > there are no pages in the skb, it behaves like simple copying to iov > iterator. This patch also adds new field to the control block of skb - > this value shows current offset in the skb to read next portion of data > (it doesn't matter linear it or not). Idea behind this field is that > 'skb_copy_datagram_iter()' handles both types of skb internally - it > just needs an offset from which to copy data from the given skb. This > offset is incremented on each read from skb. This approach allows to > avoid special handling of non-linear skbs: > 1) We can't call 'skb_pull()' on it, because it updates 'data' pointer. > 2) We need to update 'data_len' also on each read from this skb. It looks like the above sentence is a left-over from previous version as, as this patch does not touch data_len. And I think it contradicts the previous one, so it's a bit confusing. > Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru> > --- > Changelog: > v5(big patchset) -> v1: > * Merge 'virtio_transport_common.c' and 'vhost/vsock.c' patches into > this single patch. > * Commit message update: grammar fix and remark that this patch is > MSG_ZEROCOPY preparation. > * Use 'min_t()' instead of comparison using '<>' operators. > v1 -> v2: > * R-b tag added. > v3 -> v4: > * R-b tag removed due to rebase: > * Part for 'virtio_transport_stream_do_peek()' is changed. > * Part for 'virtio_transport_seqpacket_do_peek()' is added. > * Comments about sleep in 'memcpy_to_msg()' now describe sleep in > 'skb_copy_datagram_iter()'. > > drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 14 +++++++---- > include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 1 + > net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 32 +++++++++++++++---------- > 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c > index 817d377a3f36..8c917be32b5d 100644 > --- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c > @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, > struct sk_buff *skb; > unsigned out, in; > size_t nbytes; > + u32 frag_off; IMHO 'offset' would be a better name for both the variable and the CB field, as it can points both inside the skb frags, linear part or frag list. Otherwise LGTM, thanks! Paolo
On 01.08.2023 16:11, Paolo Abeni wrote: > On Sun, 2023-07-30 at 11:59 +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: >> This is preparation patch for MSG_ZEROCOPY support. It adds handling of >> non-linear skbs by replacing direct calls of 'memcpy_to_msg()' with >> 'skb_copy_datagram_iter()'. Main advantage of the second one is that it >> can handle paged part of the skb by using 'kmap()' on each page, but if >> there are no pages in the skb, it behaves like simple copying to iov >> iterator. This patch also adds new field to the control block of skb - >> this value shows current offset in the skb to read next portion of data >> (it doesn't matter linear it or not). Idea behind this field is that >> 'skb_copy_datagram_iter()' handles both types of skb internally - it >> just needs an offset from which to copy data from the given skb. This >> offset is incremented on each read from skb. This approach allows to >> avoid special handling of non-linear skbs: >> 1) We can't call 'skb_pull()' on it, because it updates 'data' pointer. >> 2) We need to update 'data_len' also on each read from this skb. > > It looks like the above sentence is a left-over from previous version > as, as this patch does not touch data_len. And I think it contradicts > the previous one, so it's a bit confusing. Yes, seems I need to rephrase it in the next version. I meant that with approach introduced in this patch we don't need to check that skb is linear of non-linear after reading data from it. Because otherwise: 1) In case of linear skb we will need to call 'skb_pull()' after reading data, to update 'data' pointer. 2) In case of non-linear skb we will need to update 'data_len' field after reading data, as this field shows amount of data in fragged part. > >> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru> >> --- >> Changelog: >> v5(big patchset) -> v1: >> * Merge 'virtio_transport_common.c' and 'vhost/vsock.c' patches into >> this single patch. >> * Commit message update: grammar fix and remark that this patch is >> MSG_ZEROCOPY preparation. >> * Use 'min_t()' instead of comparison using '<>' operators. >> v1 -> v2: >> * R-b tag added. >> v3 -> v4: >> * R-b tag removed due to rebase: >> * Part for 'virtio_transport_stream_do_peek()' is changed. >> * Part for 'virtio_transport_seqpacket_do_peek()' is added. >> * Comments about sleep in 'memcpy_to_msg()' now describe sleep in >> 'skb_copy_datagram_iter()'. >> >> drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 14 +++++++---- >> include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 1 + >> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 32 +++++++++++++++---------- >> 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c >> index 817d377a3f36..8c917be32b5d 100644 >> --- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c >> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c >> @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, >> struct sk_buff *skb; >> unsigned out, in; >> size_t nbytes; >> + u32 frag_off; > > IMHO 'offset' would be a better name for both the variable and the CB > field, as it can points both inside the skb frags, linear part or frag > list. Ack > > Otherwise LGTM, thanks! > > Paolo > Thanks, Arseniy
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c index 817d377a3f36..8c917be32b5d 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, struct sk_buff *skb; unsigned out, in; size_t nbytes; + u32 frag_off; int head; skb = virtio_vsock_skb_dequeue(&vsock->send_pkt_queue); @@ -156,7 +157,8 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, } iov_iter_init(&iov_iter, ITER_DEST, &vq->iov[out], in, iov_len); - payload_len = skb->len; + frag_off = VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->frag_off; + payload_len = skb->len - frag_off; hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb); /* If the packet is greater than the space available in the @@ -197,8 +199,10 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, break; } - nbytes = copy_to_iter(skb->data, payload_len, &iov_iter); - if (nbytes != payload_len) { + if (skb_copy_datagram_iter(skb, + frag_off, + &iov_iter, + payload_len)) { kfree_skb(skb); vq_err(vq, "Faulted on copying pkt buf\n"); break; @@ -212,13 +216,13 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, vhost_add_used(vq, head, sizeof(*hdr) + payload_len); added = true; - skb_pull(skb, payload_len); + VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->frag_off += payload_len; total_len += payload_len; /* If we didn't send all the payload we can requeue the packet * to send it with the next available buffer. */ - if (skb->len > 0) { + if (VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->frag_off < skb->len) { hdr->flags |= cpu_to_le32(flags_to_restore); /* We are queueing the same skb to handle diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h index c58453699ee9..17dbb7176e37 100644 --- a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h +++ b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ struct virtio_vsock_skb_cb { bool reply; bool tap_delivered; + u32 frag_off; }; #define VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb) ((struct virtio_vsock_skb_cb *)((skb)->cb)) diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c index 352d042b130b..0b6a89139810 100644 --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c @@ -364,9 +364,10 @@ virtio_transport_stream_do_peek(struct vsock_sock *vsk, spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock); /* sk_lock is held by caller so no one else can dequeue. - * Unlock rx_lock since memcpy_to_msg() may sleep. + * Unlock rx_lock since skb_copy_datagram_iter() may sleep. */ - err = memcpy_to_msg(msg, skb->data, bytes); + err = skb_copy_datagram_iter(skb, VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->frag_off, + &msg->msg_iter, bytes); if (err) goto out; @@ -410,25 +411,27 @@ virtio_transport_stream_do_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk, while (total < len && !skb_queue_empty(&vvs->rx_queue)) { skb = skb_peek(&vvs->rx_queue); - bytes = len - total; - if (bytes > skb->len) - bytes = skb->len; + bytes = min_t(size_t, len - total, + skb->len - VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->frag_off); /* sk_lock is held by caller so no one else can dequeue. - * Unlock rx_lock since memcpy_to_msg() may sleep. + * Unlock rx_lock since skb_copy_datagram_iter() may sleep. */ spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock); - err = memcpy_to_msg(msg, skb->data, bytes); + err = skb_copy_datagram_iter(skb, + VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->frag_off, + &msg->msg_iter, bytes); if (err) goto out; spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock); total += bytes; - skb_pull(skb, bytes); - if (skb->len == 0) { + VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->frag_off += bytes; + + if (skb->len == VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->frag_off) { u32 pkt_len = le32_to_cpu(virtio_vsock_hdr(skb)->len); virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt(vvs, pkt_len); @@ -492,9 +495,10 @@ virtio_transport_seqpacket_do_peek(struct vsock_sock *vsk, spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock); /* sk_lock is held by caller so no one else can dequeue. - * Unlock rx_lock since memcpy_to_msg() may sleep. + * Unlock rx_lock since skb_copy_datagram_iter() may sleep. */ - err = memcpy_to_msg(msg, skb->data, bytes); + err = skb_copy_datagram_iter(skb, VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->frag_off, + &msg->msg_iter, bytes); if (err) return err; @@ -553,11 +557,13 @@ static int virtio_transport_seqpacket_do_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk, int err; /* sk_lock is held by caller so no one else can dequeue. - * Unlock rx_lock since memcpy_to_msg() may sleep. + * Unlock rx_lock since skb_copy_datagram_iter() may sleep. */ spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock); - err = memcpy_to_msg(msg, skb->data, bytes_to_copy); + err = skb_copy_datagram_iter(skb, 0, + &msg->msg_iter, + bytes_to_copy); if (err) { /* Copy of message failed. Rest of * fragments will be freed without copy.
This is preparation patch for MSG_ZEROCOPY support. It adds handling of non-linear skbs by replacing direct calls of 'memcpy_to_msg()' with 'skb_copy_datagram_iter()'. Main advantage of the second one is that it can handle paged part of the skb by using 'kmap()' on each page, but if there are no pages in the skb, it behaves like simple copying to iov iterator. This patch also adds new field to the control block of skb - this value shows current offset in the skb to read next portion of data (it doesn't matter linear it or not). Idea behind this field is that 'skb_copy_datagram_iter()' handles both types of skb internally - it just needs an offset from which to copy data from the given skb. This offset is incremented on each read from skb. This approach allows to avoid special handling of non-linear skbs: 1) We can't call 'skb_pull()' on it, because it updates 'data' pointer. 2) We need to update 'data_len' also on each read from this skb. Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru> --- Changelog: v5(big patchset) -> v1: * Merge 'virtio_transport_common.c' and 'vhost/vsock.c' patches into this single patch. * Commit message update: grammar fix and remark that this patch is MSG_ZEROCOPY preparation. * Use 'min_t()' instead of comparison using '<>' operators. v1 -> v2: * R-b tag added. v3 -> v4: * R-b tag removed due to rebase: * Part for 'virtio_transport_stream_do_peek()' is changed. * Part for 'virtio_transport_seqpacket_do_peek()' is added. * Comments about sleep in 'memcpy_to_msg()' now describe sleep in 'skb_copy_datagram_iter()'. drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 14 +++++++---- include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 1 + net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 32 +++++++++++++++---------- 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)