diff mbox series

[bpf-next,01/10] selftests/xsk: print per packet info in verbose mode

Message ID 20230809124343.12957-2-magnus.karlsson@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series seltests/xsk: various improvements to xskxceiver | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 5 maintainers not CCed: shuah@kernel.org yonghong.song@linux.dev mykolal@fb.com linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org jonathan.lemon@gmail.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: line length of 86 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 87 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 92 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 95 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 97 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 98 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 fail Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Magnus Karlsson Aug. 9, 2023, 12:43 p.m. UTC
From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>

Print info about every packet in verbose mode, both for Tx and
Rx. This is useful to have when a test fails or to validate that a
test is really doing what it was designed to do. Info on what is
supposed to be received and sent is also printed for the custom packet
streams since they differ from the base line. Here is an example:

Tx addr: 37e0 len: 64 options: 0 pkt_nb: 8
Tx addr: 4000 len: 64 options: 0 pkt_nb: 9
Rx: addr: 100 len: 64 options: 0 pkt_nb: 0 valid: 1
Rx: addr: 1100 len: 64 options: 0 pkt_nb: 1 valid: 1
Rx: addr: 2100 len: 64 options: 0 pkt_nb: 4 valid: 1
Rx: addr: 3100 len: 64 options: 0 pkt_nb: 8 valid: 1
Rx: addr: 4100 len: 64 options: 0 pkt_nb: 9 valid: 1

One pointless verbose print statement is also deleted and another one
is made clearer.

Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c | 13 ++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
index 2827f2d7cf30..c595c0b65417 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
@@ -747,6 +747,9 @@  static struct pkt_stream *__pkt_stream_generate_custom(struct ifobject *ifobj, s
 			len = 0;
 		}
 
+		print_verbose("offset: %d len: %u valid: %u options: %u pkt_nb: %u\n",
+			      pkt->offset, pkt->len, pkt->valid, pkt->options, pkt->pkt_nb);
+
 		if (pkt->valid && pkt->len > pkt_stream->max_pkt_len)
 			pkt_stream->max_pkt_len = pkt->len;
 		pkt_nb++;
@@ -1042,6 +1045,9 @@  static int receive_pkts(struct test_spec *test, struct pollfd *fds)
 				return TEST_FAILURE;
 			}
 
+			print_verbose("Rx: addr: %lx len: %u options: %u pkt_nb: %u valid: %u\n",
+				      addr, desc->len, desc->options, pkt->pkt_nb, pkt->valid);
+
 			if (!is_frag_valid(umem, addr, desc->len, pkt->pkt_nb, pkt_len) ||
 			    !is_offset_correct(umem, pkt, addr) ||
 			    (ifobj->use_metadata && !is_metadata_correct(pkt, umem->buffer, addr)))
@@ -1165,6 +1171,9 @@  static int __send_pkts(struct ifobject *ifobject, struct pollfd *fds, bool timeo
 					     bytes_written);
 			bytes_written += tx_desc->len;
 
+			print_verbose("Tx addr: %llx len: %u options: %u pkt_nb: %u\n",
+				      tx_desc->addr, tx_desc->len, tx_desc->options, pkt->pkt_nb);
+
 			if (nb_frags_left) {
 				i++;
 				if (pkt_stream->verbatim)
@@ -1475,8 +1484,6 @@  static void *worker_testapp_validate_tx(void *arg)
 			thread_common_ops_tx(test, ifobject);
 	}
 
-	print_verbose("Sending %d packets on interface %s\n", ifobject->pkt_stream->nb_pkts,
-		      ifobject->ifname);
 	err = send_pkts(test, ifobject);
 
 	if (!err && ifobject->validation_func)
@@ -1715,7 +1722,7 @@  static int testapp_bidi(struct test_spec *test)
 	if (testapp_validate_traffic(test))
 		return TEST_FAILURE;
 
-	print_verbose("Switching Tx/Rx vectors\n");
+	print_verbose("Switching Tx/Rx direction\n");
 	swap_directions(&test->ifobj_rx, &test->ifobj_tx);
 	res = __testapp_validate_traffic(test, test->ifobj_rx, test->ifobj_tx);