diff mbox series

[net-next,v3,2/2] net: stmmac: Tx coe sw fallback

Message ID 20230814140637.27629-3-rohan.g.thomas@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series net: stmmac: Tx coe sw fallback | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 1357 this patch: 1357
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 3 maintainers not CCed: ahalaney@redhat.com simon.horman@corigine.com bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 1353 this patch: 1353
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 1380 this patch: 1380
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 56 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Rohan G Thomas Aug. 14, 2023, 2:06 p.m. UTC
Add sw fallback of tx checksum calculation for those tx queues that
don't support tx checksum offloading. Because, some DWMAC IPs support
tx checksum offloading only for a few initial tx queues, starting
from tx queue 0.

Signed-off-by: Rohan G Thomas <rohan.g.thomas@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h  |  2 ++
 .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c |  4 ++++
 include/linux/stmmac.h                        |  1 +
 4 files changed, 26 insertions(+)

Comments

Jose Abreu Aug. 14, 2023, 4:47 p.m. UTC | #1
From: Rohan G Thomas <rohan.g.thomas@intel.com>
Date: Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 15:06:37

> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
> @@ -219,6 +219,8 @@ struct stmmac_priv {
>  	int hwts_tx_en;
>  	bool tx_path_in_lpi_mode;
>  	bool tso;
> +	bool tx_q_coe_lmt;

Please use a flag here instead of "tx_q_coe_lmt". This is the preferrable method now.

Thanks,
Jose

> +	u32 tx_q_with_coe;
>  	int sph;
>  	int sph_cap;
>  	u32 sarc_type;
Rohan G Thomas Aug. 14, 2023, 6:13 p.m. UTC | #2
From: Rohan G Thomas <rohan.g.thomas@intel.com>

From: Rohan G Thomas <rohan.g.thomas@intel.com>
Date: Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 15:06:37
> 
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
> > @@ -219,6 +219,8 @@ struct stmmac_priv {
> >  	int hwts_tx_en;
> >  	bool tx_path_in_lpi_mode;
> >  	bool tso;
> > +	bool tx_q_coe_lmt;
> 
> Please use a flag here instead of "tx_q_coe_lmt". This is the preferrable
> method now.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jose

Thanks Jose for the feedback. If I read that correctly, your
suggestion is to change " tx_q_coe_lmt" to something more readable,
like "has_txcoe_limit". Please correct me if I understand it wrongly.

BR,
Rohan

> 
> > +	u32 tx_q_with_coe;
> >  	int sph;
> >  	int sph_cap;
> >  	u32 sarc_type;
Rohan G Thomas Aug. 15, 2023, 3:51 a.m. UTC | #3
From: Rohan G Thomas <rohan.g.thomas@intel.com>
Date: Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 15:06:37
> > > +	bool tx_q_coe_lmt;
> >
> > Please use a flag here instead of "tx_q_coe_lmt". This is the
> > preferrable method now.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jose
> 
> Thanks Jose for the feedback. If I read that correctly, your suggestion is to
> change " tx_q_coe_lmt" to something more readable, like "has_txcoe_limit".
> Please correct me if I understand it wrongly.
> 
> BR,
> Rohan
>

Or, use int instead of bool?

BR,
Rohan
Jose Abreu Aug. 16, 2023, 3:45 p.m. UTC | #4
From: Rohan G Thomas <rohan.g.thomas@intel.com>
Date: Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 04:51:45

> From: Rohan G Thomas <rohan.g.thomas@intel.com>
> Date: Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 15:06:37
> > > > +	bool tx_q_coe_lmt;
> > >
> > > Please use a flag here instead of "tx_q_coe_lmt". This is the
> > > preferrable method now.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jose
> > 
> > Thanks Jose for the feedback. If I read that correctly, your suggestion is to
> > change " tx_q_coe_lmt" to something more readable, like "has_txcoe_limit".
> > Please correct me if I understand it wrongly.
> > 
> > BR,
> > Rohan
> >
> 
> Or, use int instead of bool?

No, I mean to replace it with a bit flag as it was done on https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230710090001.303225-1-brgl@bgdev.pl/.

Thanks,
Jose
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
index 3401e888a9f6..f526bcaaaf64 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
@@ -219,6 +219,8 @@  struct stmmac_priv {
 	int hwts_tx_en;
 	bool tx_path_in_lpi_mode;
 	bool tso;
+	bool tx_q_coe_lmt;
+	u32 tx_q_with_coe;
 	int sph;
 	int sph_cap;
 	u32 sarc_type;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
index 733b5e900817..555d40bcc089 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
@@ -4409,6 +4409,17 @@  static netdev_tx_t stmmac_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 	WARN_ON(tx_q->tx_skbuff[first_entry]);
 
 	csum_insertion = (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL);
+	/* Some DWMAC IPs support tx coe only for a few initial tx queues,
+	 * starting from tx queue 0. So checksum offloading for those queues
+	 * that don't support tx coe needs to fallback to software checksum
+	 * calculation.
+	 */
+	if (csum_insertion && priv->tx_q_coe_lmt &&
+	    queue >= priv->tx_q_with_coe) {
+		if (unlikely(skb_checksum_help(skb)))
+			goto dma_map_err;
+		csum_insertion = !csum_insertion;
+	}
 
 	if (likely(priv->extend_desc))
 		desc = (struct dma_desc *)(tx_q->dma_etx + entry);
@@ -7401,6 +7412,14 @@  int stmmac_dvr_probe(struct device *device,
 		dev_info(priv->device, "SPH feature enabled\n");
 	}
 
+	if (priv->plat->tx_coe &&
+	    priv->plat->tx_queues_with_coe < priv->plat->tx_queues_to_use) {
+		priv->tx_q_coe_lmt = true;
+		priv->tx_q_with_coe = priv->plat->tx_queues_with_coe;
+		dev_info(priv->device, "TX COE limited to %u tx queues\n",
+			 priv->tx_q_with_coe);
+	}
+
 	/* Ideally our host DMA address width is the same as for the
 	 * device. However, it may differ and then we have to use our
 	 * host DMA width for allocation and the device DMA width for
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
index be8e79c7aa34..0138b7c9c7ab 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
@@ -225,6 +225,10 @@  static int stmmac_mtl_setup(struct platform_device *pdev,
 				 &plat->tx_queues_to_use))
 		plat->tx_queues_to_use = 1;
 
+	if (of_property_read_u32(tx_node, "snps,tx-queues-with-coe",
+				 &plat->tx_queues_with_coe))
+		plat->tx_queues_with_coe = plat->tx_queues_to_use;
+
 	if (of_property_read_bool(tx_node, "snps,tx-sched-wrr"))
 		plat->tx_sched_algorithm = MTL_TX_ALGORITHM_WRR;
 	else if (of_property_read_bool(tx_node, "snps,tx-sched-wfq"))
diff --git a/include/linux/stmmac.h b/include/linux/stmmac.h
index 784277d666eb..cb508164eaea 100644
--- a/include/linux/stmmac.h
+++ b/include/linux/stmmac.h
@@ -252,6 +252,7 @@  struct plat_stmmacenet_data {
 	u32 host_dma_width;
 	u32 rx_queues_to_use;
 	u32 tx_queues_to_use;
+	u32 tx_queues_with_coe;
 	u8 rx_sched_algorithm;
 	u8 tx_sched_algorithm;
 	struct stmmac_rxq_cfg rx_queues_cfg[MTL_MAX_RX_QUEUES];