@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static struct task_struct *task_group_seq_get_next(struct bpf_iter_seq_task_comm
{
struct task_struct *task;
struct pid *pid;
- u32 saved_tid;
+ u32 next_tid;
if (!*tid) {
/* The first time, the iterator calls this function. */
@@ -70,21 +70,18 @@ static struct task_struct *task_group_seq_get_next(struct bpf_iter_seq_task_comm
retry:
task = next_thread(task);
- saved_tid = *tid;
- *tid = __task_pid_nr_ns(task, PIDTYPE_PID, common->ns);
- if (!*tid || *tid == common->pid) {
+ next_tid = __task_pid_nr_ns(task, PIDTYPE_PID, common->ns);
+ if (!next_tid || next_tid == common->pid) {
/* Run out of tasks of a process. The tasks of a
* thread_group are linked as circular linked list.
*/
- *tid = saved_tid;
return NULL;
}
- common->pid_visiting = *tid;
-
if (skip_if_dup_files && task->files == task->group_leader->files)
goto retry;
+ *tid = common->pid_visiting = next_tid;
get_task_struct(task);
return task;
}
Kill saved_tid. It looks ugly to update *tid and then restore the previous value if __task_pid_nr_ns() returns 0. Change this code to update *tid and common->pid_visiting once before return. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> --- kernel/bpf/task_iter.c | 11 ++++------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)