From patchwork Tue Sep 5 15:46:54 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Oleg Nesterov X-Patchwork-Id: 13374529 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A48BA2571 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 15:47:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C66DD194 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 08:47:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1693928869; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=kbHpZKosKm0C7zhU/OsIgTNX0r2M4ft/T+RvV9Bm49w=; b=XdkIjG5w3iCJeO+Nf7o9LALIDFzMSUtMobxtDlkUUVHdwdKIqS8p/z45jY9Cgc5rdHSGUW x5eBink5YOJMsRZee2/VXTi8IHCfgnB4k5eP6eizM2oY0rbW19iWI4cY7r2Uo/e2iInV8h NSD3jo1d5QLfmP/qZei3Ez9aRgPOsWs= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-688-6CRKtLehOyC9SP4SFCxraw-1; Tue, 05 Sep 2023 11:47:46 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 6CRKtLehOyC9SP4SFCxraw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F7088A4360; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 15:47:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-27-174.brq.redhat.com (unknown [10.45.226.87]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D7F466B5AA; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 15:47:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dhcp-27-174.brq.redhat.com (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000 oleg@redhat.com; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 17:46:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 17:46:54 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Yonghong Song Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Kui-Feng Lee , bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/5] bpf: task_group_seq_get_next: kill next_task Message-ID: <20230905154654.GA24945@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230905154612.GA24872@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.5 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net It only adds the unnecessary confusion and compicates the "retry" code. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Acked-by: Yonghong Song --- kernel/bpf/task_iter.c | 14 ++++++-------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c index 2264870ae3fc..f51f476ec679 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static struct task_struct *task_group_seq_get_next(struct bpf_iter_seq_task_comm u32 *tid, bool skip_if_dup_files) { - struct task_struct *task, *next_task; + struct task_struct *task; struct pid *pid; u32 saved_tid; @@ -68,10 +68,10 @@ static struct task_struct *task_group_seq_get_next(struct bpf_iter_seq_task_comm return NULL; retry: - next_task = next_thread(task); + task = next_thread(task); saved_tid = *tid; - *tid = __task_pid_nr_ns(next_task, PIDTYPE_PID, common->ns); + *tid = __task_pid_nr_ns(task, PIDTYPE_PID, common->ns); if (!*tid || *tid == common->pid) { /* Run out of tasks of a process. The tasks of a * thread_group are linked as circular linked list. @@ -82,13 +82,11 @@ static struct task_struct *task_group_seq_get_next(struct bpf_iter_seq_task_comm common->pid_visiting = *tid; - if (skip_if_dup_files && next_task->files == next_task->group_leader->files) { - task = next_task; + if (skip_if_dup_files && task->files == task->group_leader->files) goto retry; - } - get_task_struct(next_task); - return next_task; + get_task_struct(task); + return task; } static struct task_struct *task_seq_get_next(struct bpf_iter_seq_task_common *common,