diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v3,07/17] bpf: Perform CFG walk for exception callback

Message ID 20230912233214.1518551-8-memxor@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit b62bf8a5e9110922f58f6ea8fe747e1759f49e61
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series Exceptions - 1/2 | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format fail Series longer than 15 patches (and no cover letter)
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 1354 this patch: 1354
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 6 maintainers not CCed: jolsa@kernel.org haoluo@google.com sdf@google.com john.fastabend@gmail.com kpsingh@kernel.org song@kernel.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 1367 this patch: 1367
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 1377 this patch: 1377
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: line length of 87 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary

Commit Message

Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi Sept. 12, 2023, 11:32 p.m. UTC 
Since exception callbacks are not referenced using bpf_pseudo_func and
bpf_pseudo_call instructions, check_cfg traversal will never explore
instructions of the exception callback. Even after adding the subprog,
the program will then fail with a 'unreachable insn' error.

We thus need to begin walking from the start of the exception callback
again in check_cfg after a complete CFG traversal finishes, so as to
explore the CFG rooted at the exception callback.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index ec3f22312516..863e4e6c4616 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -15126,8 +15126,8 @@  static int check_cfg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 {
 	int insn_cnt = env->prog->len;
 	int *insn_stack, *insn_state;
-	int ret = 0;
-	int i;
+	int ex_insn_beg, i, ret = 0;
+	bool ex_done = false;
 
 	insn_state = env->cfg.insn_state = kvcalloc(insn_cnt, sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!insn_state)
@@ -15143,6 +15143,7 @@  static int check_cfg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 	insn_stack[0] = 0; /* 0 is the first instruction */
 	env->cfg.cur_stack = 1;
 
+walk_cfg:
 	while (env->cfg.cur_stack > 0) {
 		int t = insn_stack[env->cfg.cur_stack - 1];
 
@@ -15169,6 +15170,16 @@  static int check_cfg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 		goto err_free;
 	}
 
+	if (env->exception_callback_subprog && !ex_done) {
+		ex_insn_beg = env->subprog_info[env->exception_callback_subprog].start;
+
+		insn_state[ex_insn_beg] = DISCOVERED;
+		insn_stack[0] = ex_insn_beg;
+		env->cfg.cur_stack = 1;
+		ex_done = true;
+		goto walk_cfg;
+	}
+
 	for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++) {
 		if (insn_state[i] != EXPLORED) {
 			verbose(env, "unreachable insn %d\n", i);