From patchwork Thu Sep 28 15:09:43 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Aurelien Aptel X-Patchwork-Id: 13403225 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6C824CFDA for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 15:11:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm6nam10on2057.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.93.57]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D230194; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 08:11:07 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=M7uuvqKeeIMwC91uxLiNq2IZTJQX5o+VImqrdCvbip7AvFKo9U/RHvSyz/f5oh2Xwu9kbc2kynVcF5fYHwhgqDx+LzyiO1IP4Yyus+zcuyFJDxYgvZK20sS1Sx9xb4Kunh+2FbAtBv3TVb6iUZzKQy2Pa7DvZ+RzM25/C+ALW6Rze4cVUNt7It48vRSPXoB9uj2bX46ISAh24KnN3QdPUBhwfg9q0Zp9DV8NFa94kfhFeXi+wIBX8O5OR0oK7g2KydSjQNC2gl9r7MIARS6fQQGsJ0c7NS+Nx4wPSv3s0t7M/J7SRJvkbkkd1/uIeTgp/IGl2eT1tDSGGGBrasKOPg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=C6kWaOq2AA5bU8mKdYgkuFxRTYeDy/QUO12WKeAWDjY=; b=QxJ/EGoXgcxcBsS6NhndZQVsP7A/iU4FJFkvIt0kDdziza2o8zfLXKcR5O2xsZTwHGX1TH1nm7iZDcxc/GtV3GRNKt/3O7TxlLWjyHlCfUx/Ss7QlRjfXjTjbK3joc8Te4308DIOs5C1AwpJuu0DbDpIcuCGCoLJ6W623yIF4Ct4McDEJeI9wBJPaDog5KUWBqAHHtjh8tqev6T4lkxTWKXPVf6ev7wOW/4fTwvTrjS3E4Ly1VueEFwljRMzt90JkA18seFHeCMBKjFFYe/s6B97gpZIBQIeO/ACPUZiMvsfCNZxzBzYDINJhYGNaRPCYhFlGbxMqTtnXs4nkh1nEQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nvidia.com; dkim=pass header.d=nvidia.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Nvidia.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=C6kWaOq2AA5bU8mKdYgkuFxRTYeDy/QUO12WKeAWDjY=; b=nTIPJdUD+3IUP6yUj+IclenwrMxsqvaBMpnDIm8MK15cBwAotlAKL/1sAR+Vo3Our0430ByZyGvheFGB0sezSWzWhdJQClpw0h+hWyCp7hjMEHqYa2lz7aio5Kg7zNAb1l95OkQiXmfXVUszjsbfg7bVD9zAylqHw8uHHBF10wMTBB39+MK5JyKfQCMK23UI/D73HFcY/2h9MuvLu+7lHhEDp8c99JoGqCTRQo9/5v2BjUqnkiBSZ9fdYviX7iYqbOBFPJeiKH6OazxPPwgyO/Bt3HXi/2I7p0bPBlfH6+uFiFl4/1Bm8s14lFdi3Vmabc1GeLnjl+3xjruE74OGEA== Authentication-Results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=nvidia.com; Received: from SJ1PR12MB6075.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:45e::8) by PH0PR12MB7095.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:510:21d::9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.6838.25; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 15:11:04 +0000 Received: from SJ1PR12MB6075.namprd12.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::54a7:525f:1e2a:85b1]) by SJ1PR12MB6075.namprd12.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::54a7:525f:1e2a:85b1%4]) with mapi id 15.20.6838.016; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 15:11:04 +0000 From: Aurelien Aptel To: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, sagi@grimberg.me, hch@lst.de, kbusch@kernel.org, axboe@fb.com, chaitanyak@nvidia.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org Cc: Yoray Zack , aaptel@nvidia.com, aurelien.aptel@gmail.com, smalin@nvidia.com, malin1024@gmail.com, ogerlitz@nvidia.com, borisp@nvidia.com, galshalom@nvidia.com, mgurtovoy@nvidia.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net Subject: [PATCH v16 09/20] Documentation: add ULP DDP offload documentation Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 15:09:43 +0000 Message-Id: <20230928150954.1684-10-aaptel@nvidia.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20230928150954.1684-1-aaptel@nvidia.com> References: <20230928150954.1684-1-aaptel@nvidia.com> X-ClientProxiedBy: FR4P281CA0132.DEUP281.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:d10:b9::10) To SJ1PR12MB6075.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:45e::8) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: SJ1PR12MB6075:EE_|PH0PR12MB7095:EE_ X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 9484badf-61be-40ee-f9cc-08dbc0352242 X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255;CTRY:;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;H:SJ1PR12MB6075.namprd12.prod.outlook.com;PTR:;CAT:NONE;SFS:(13230031)(136003)(376002)(366004)(39860400002)(396003)(346002)(230922051799003)(186009)(1800799009)(64100799003)(451199024)(2906002)(6512007)(6666004)(6506007)(1076003)(38100700002)(2616005)(66556008)(66476007)(66946007)(86362001)(478600001)(6486002)(83380400001)(26005)(30864003)(36756003)(5660300002)(7416002)(316002)(41300700001)(4326008)(8676002)(8936002);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0: 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 X-OriginatorOrg: Nvidia.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 9484badf-61be-40ee-f9cc-08dbc0352242 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: SJ1PR12MB6075.namprd12.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Sep 2023 15:11:04.5756 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: VhrL9rpKI7faS3cG1juNqYI01cURArNzt63lFKY5u44d1UZqmRyNj/j7+l2fOtlCk9Tt9fhZvwEi6KIibkZI2A== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PH0PR12MB7095 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FORGED_SPF_HELO, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org From: Yoray Zack Document the new ULP DDP API and add it under "networking". Use NVMe-TCP implementation as an example. Signed-off-by: Boris Pismenny Signed-off-by: Ben Ben-Ishay Signed-off-by: Or Gerlitz Signed-off-by: Yoray Zack Signed-off-by: Shai Malin Signed-off-by: Aurelien Aptel --- Documentation/networking/index.rst | 1 + Documentation/networking/ulp-ddp-offload.rst | 376 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 377 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/networking/ulp-ddp-offload.rst diff --git a/Documentation/networking/index.rst b/Documentation/networking/index.rst index 5b75c3f7a137..856e4b837b67 100644 --- a/Documentation/networking/index.rst +++ b/Documentation/networking/index.rst @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ Contents: tc-actions-env-rules tc-queue-filters tcp-thin + ulp-ddp-offload team timestamping tipc diff --git a/Documentation/networking/ulp-ddp-offload.rst b/Documentation/networking/ulp-ddp-offload.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..31b7edf38647 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/networking/ulp-ddp-offload.rst @@ -0,0 +1,376 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) + +================================= +ULP direct data placement offload +================================= + +Overview +======== + +The Linux kernel ULP direct data placement (DDP) offload infrastructure +provides tagged request-response protocols, such as NVMe-TCP, the ability to +place response data directly in pre-registered buffers according to header +tags. DDP is particularly useful for data-intensive pipelined protocols whose +responses may be reordered. + +For example, in NVMe-TCP numerous read requests are sent together and each +request is tagged using the PDU header CID field. Receiving servers process +requests as fast as possible and sometimes responses for smaller requests +bypasses responses to larger requests, e.g., 4KB reads bypass 1GB reads. +Thereafter, clients correlate responses to requests using PDU header CID tags. +The processing of each response requires copying data from SKBs to read +request destination buffers; The offload avoids this copy. The offload is +oblivious to destination buffers which can reside either in userspace +(O_DIRECT) or in kernel pagecache. + +Request TCP byte-stream: + +.. parsed-literal:: + + +---------------+-------+---------------+-------+---------------+-------+ + | PDU hdr CID=1 | Req 1 | PDU hdr CID=2 | Req 2 | PDU hdr CID=3 | Req 3 | + +---------------+-------+---------------+-------+---------------+-------+ + +Response TCP byte-stream: + +.. parsed-literal:: + + +---------------+--------+---------------+--------+---------------+--------+ + | PDU hdr CID=2 | Resp 2 | PDU hdr CID=3 | Resp 3 | PDU hdr CID=1 | Resp 1 | + +---------------+--------+---------------+--------+---------------+--------+ + +The driver builds SKB page fragments that point to destination buffers. +Consequently, SKBs represent the original data on the wire, which enables +*transparent* inter-operation with the network stack. To avoid copies between +SKBs and destination buffers, the layer-5 protocol (L5P) will check +``if (src == dst)`` for SKB page fragments, success indicates that data is +already placed there by NIC hardware and copy should be skipped. + +In addition, L5P might have DDGST which ensures data integrity over +the network. If not offloaded, ULP DDP might not be efficient as L5P +will need to go over the data and calculate it by itself, cancelling +out the benefits of the DDP copy skip. ULP DDP has support for Rx/Tx +DDGST offload. On the received side the NIC will verify DDGST for +received PDUs and update SKB->ulp_ddp and SKB->ulp_crc bits. If all the SKBs +making up a L5P PDU have crc on, L5P will skip on calculating and +verifying the DDGST for the corresponding PDU. On the Tx side, the NIC +will be responsible for calculating and filling the DDGST fields in +the sent PDUs. + +Offloading does require NIC hardware to track L5P protocol framing, similarly +to RX TLS offload (see Documentation/networking/tls-offload.rst). NIC hardware +will parse PDU headers, extract fields such as operation type, length, tag +identifier, etc. and only offload segments that correspond to tags registered +with the NIC, see the :ref:`buf_reg` section. + +Device configuration +==================== + +During driver initialization the driver sets the following +:c:type:`struct net_device ` properties: + +* The ULP DDP capabilities it supports + in :c:type:`struct ulp_ddp_netdev_caps ` +* The ULP DDP operations pointer in :c:type:`struct ulp_ddp_dev_ops `. + +The current list of capabilities is represented as a bitset: + +.. code-block:: c + + enum { + ULP_DDP_C_NVME_TCP_BIT, + ULP_DDP_C_NVME_TCP_DDGST_RX_BIT, + /* add capabilities above */ + ULP_DDP_C_COUNT, + }; + +The enablement of capabilities can be controlled from userspace via +netlink. See Documentation/netlink/specs/ulp_ddp.yaml for more +details. + +Later, after the L5P completes its handshake, the L5P queries the +driver for its runtime limitations via the :c:member:`limits` operation: + +.. code-block:: c + + int (*limits)(struct net_device *netdev, + struct ulp_ddp_limits *lim); + + +All L5P share a common set of limits and parameters (:c:type:`struct ulp_ddp_limits `): + +.. code-block:: c + + /** + * struct ulp_ddp_limits - Generic ulp ddp limits: tcp ddp + * protocol limits. + * Add new instances of ulp_ddp_limits in the union below (nvme-tcp, etc.). + * + * @type: type of this limits struct + * @max_ddp_sgl_len: maximum sgl size supported (zero means no limit) + * @io_threshold: minimum payload size required to offload + * @tls: support for ULP over TLS + * @nvmeotcp: NVMe-TCP specific limits + */ + struct ulp_ddp_limits { + enum ulp_ddp_type type; + int max_ddp_sgl_len; + int io_threshold; + bool tls:1; + union { + /* ... protocol-specific limits ... */ + struct nvme_tcp_ddp_limits nvmeotcp; + }; + }; + +But each L5P can also add protocol-specific limits e.g.: + +.. code-block:: c + + /** + * struct nvme_tcp_ddp_limits - nvme tcp driver limitations + * + * @full_ccid_range: true if the driver supports the full CID range + */ + struct nvme_tcp_ddp_limits { + bool full_ccid_range; + }; + +Once the L5P has made sure the device is supported the offload +operations are installed on the socket. + +If offload installation fails, then the connection is handled by software as if +offload was not attempted. + +To request offload for a socket `sk`, the L5P calls :c:member:`sk_add`: + +.. code-block:: c + + int (*sk_add)(struct net_device *netdev, + struct sock *sk, + struct ulp_ddp_config *config); + +The function return 0 for success. In case of failure, L5P software should +fallback to normal non-offloaded operations. The `config` parameter indicates +the L5P type and any metadata relevant for that protocol. For example, in +NVMe-TCP the following config is used: + +.. code-block:: c + + /** + * struct nvme_tcp_ddp_config - nvme tcp ddp configuration for an IO queue + * + * @pfv: pdu version (e.g., NVME_TCP_PFV_1_0) + * @cpda: controller pdu data alignment (dwords, 0's based) + * @dgst: digest types enabled. + * The netdev will offload crc if L5P data digest is supported. + * @queue_size: number of nvme-tcp IO queue elements + * @queue_id: queue identifier + */ + struct nvme_tcp_ddp_config { + u16 pfv; + u8 cpda; + u8 dgst; + int queue_size; + int queue_id; + }; + +When offload is not needed anymore, e.g. when the socket is being released, the L5P +calls :c:member:`sk_del` to release device contexts: + +.. code-block:: c + + void (*sk_del)(struct net_device *netdev, + struct sock *sk); + +Normal operation +================ + +At the very least, the device maintains the following state for each connection: + + * 5-tuple + * expected TCP sequence number + * mapping between tags and corresponding buffers + * current offset within PDU, PDU length, current PDU tag + +NICs should not assume any correlation between PDUs and TCP packets. +If TCP packets arrive in-order, offload will place PDU payloads +directly inside corresponding registered buffers. NIC offload should +not delay packets. If offload is not possible, than the packet is +passed as-is to software. To perform offload on incoming packets +without buffering packets in the NIC, the NIC stores some inter-packet +state, such as partial PDU headers. + +RX data-path +------------ + +After the device validates TCP checksums, it can perform DDP offload. The +packet is steered to the DDP offload context according to the 5-tuple. +Thereafter, the expected TCP sequence number is checked against the packet +TCP sequence number. If there is a match, offload is performed: the PDU payload +is DMA written to the corresponding destination buffer according to the PDU header +tag. The data should be DMAed only once, and the NIC receive ring will only +store the remaining TCP and PDU headers. + +We remark that a single TCP packet may have numerous PDUs embedded inside. NICs +can choose to offload one or more of these PDUs according to various +trade-offs. Possibly, offloading such small PDUs is of little value, and it is +better to leave it to software. + +Upon receiving a DDP offloaded packet, the driver reconstructs the original SKB +using page frags, while pointing to the destination buffers whenever possible. +This method enables seamless integration with the network stack, which can +inspect and modify packet fields transparently to the offload. + +.. _buf_reg: + +Destination buffer registration +------------------------------- + +To register the mapping between tags and destination buffers for a socket +`sk`, the L5P calls :c:member:`setup` of :c:type:`struct ulp_ddp_ops +`: + +.. code-block:: c + + int (*setup)(struct net_device *netdev, + struct sock *sk, + struct ulp_ddp_io *io); + + +The `io` provides the buffer via scatter-gather list (`sg_table`) and +corresponding tag (`command_id`): + +.. code-block:: c + + /** + * struct ulp_ddp_io - tcp ddp configuration for an IO request. + * + * @command_id: identifier on the wire associated with these buffers + * @nents: number of entries in the sg_table + * @sg_table: describing the buffers for this IO request + * @first_sgl: first SGL in sg_table + */ + struct ulp_ddp_io { + u32 command_id; + int nents; + struct sg_table sg_table; + struct scatterlist first_sgl[SG_CHUNK_SIZE]; + }; + +After the buffers have been consumed by the L5P, to release the NIC mapping of +buffers the L5P calls :c:member:`teardown` of :c:type:`struct +ulp_ddp_ops `: + +.. code-block:: c + + void (*teardown)(struct net_device *netdev, + struct sock *sk, + struct ulp_ddp_io *io, + void *ddp_ctx); + +`teardown` receives the same `io` context and an additional opaque +`ddp_ctx` that is used for asynchronous teardown, see the :ref:`async_release` +section. + +.. _async_release: + +Asynchronous teardown +--------------------- + +To teardown the association between tags and buffers and allow tag reuse NIC HW +is called by the NIC driver during `teardown`. This operation may be +performed either synchronously or asynchronously. In asynchronous teardown, +`teardown` returns immediately without unmapping NIC HW buffers. Later, +when the unmapping completes by NIC HW, the NIC driver will call up to L5P +using :c:member:`ddp_teardown_done` of :c:type:`struct ulp_ddp_ulp_ops `: + +.. code-block:: c + + void (*ddp_teardown_done)(void *ddp_ctx); + +The `ddp_ctx` parameter passed in `ddp_teardown_done` is the same on provided +in `teardown` and it is used to carry some context about the buffers +and tags that are released. + +Resync handling +=============== + +RX +-- +In presence of packet drops or network packet reordering, the device may lose +synchronization between the TCP stream and the L5P framing, and require a +resync with the kernel's TCP stack. When the device is out of sync, no offload +takes place, and packets are passed as-is to software. Resync is very similar +to TLS offload (see documentation at Documentation/networking/tls-offload.rst) + +If only packets with L5P data are lost or reordered, then resynchronization may +be avoided by NIC HW that keeps tracking PDU headers. If, however, PDU headers +are reordered, then resynchronization is necessary. + +To resynchronize hardware during traffic, we use a handshake between hardware +and software. The NIC HW searches for a sequence of bytes that identifies L5P +headers (i.e., magic pattern). For example, in NVMe-TCP, the PDU operation +type can be used for this purpose. Using the PDU header length field, the NIC +HW will continue to find and match magic patterns in subsequent PDU headers. If +the pattern is missing in an expected position, then searching for the pattern +starts anew. + +The NIC will not resume offload when the magic pattern is first identified. +Instead, it will request L5P software to confirm that indeed this is a PDU +header. To request confirmation the NIC driver calls up to L5P using +:c:member:`resync_request` of :c:type:`struct ulp_ddp_ulp_ops `: + +.. code-block:: c + + bool (*resync_request)(struct sock *sk, u32 seq, u32 flags); + +The `seq` parameter contains the TCP sequence of the last byte in the PDU header. +The `flags` parameter contains a flag (`ULP_DDP_RESYNC_PENDING`) indicating whether +a request is pending or not. +L5P software will respond to this request after observing the packet containing +TCP sequence `seq` in-order. If the PDU header is indeed there, then L5P +software calls the NIC driver using the :c:member:`resync` function of +the :c:type:`struct ulp_ddp_dev_ops ` inside the :c:type:`struct +net_device ` while passing the same `seq` to confirm it is a PDU +header. + +.. code-block:: c + + void (*resync)(struct net_device *netdev, + struct sock *sk, u32 seq); + +Statistics +========== + +Per L5P protocol, the NIC driver must report statistics for the above +netdevice operations and packets processed by offload. +These statistics are per-device and can be retrieved from userspace +via netlink (see Documentation/netlink/specs/ulp_ddp.yaml). + +For example, NVMe-TCP offload reports: + + * ``rx_nvmeotcp_sk_add`` - number of NVMe-TCP Rx offload contexts created. + * ``rx_nvmeotcp_sk_add_fail`` - number of NVMe-TCP Rx offload context creation + failures. + * ``rx_nvmeotcp_sk_del`` - number of NVMe-TCP Rx offload contexts destroyed. + * ``rx_nvmeotcp_ddp_setup`` - number of DDP buffers mapped. + * ``rx_nvmeotcp_ddp_setup_fail`` - number of DDP buffers mapping that failed. + * ``rx_nvmeotcp_ddp_teardown`` - number of DDP buffers unmapped. + * ``rx_nvmeotcp_drop`` - number of packets dropped in the driver due to fatal + errors. + * ``rx_nvmeotcp_resync`` - number of packets with resync requests. + * ``rx_nvmeotcp_packets`` - number of packets that used offload. + * ``rx_nvmeotcp_bytes`` - number of bytes placed in DDP buffers. + +NIC requirements +================ + +NIC hardware should meet the following requirements to provide this offload: + + * Offload must never buffer TCP packets. + * Offload must never modify TCP packet headers. + * Offload must never reorder TCP packets within a flow. + * Offload must never drop TCP packets. + * Offload must not depend on any TCP fields beyond the + 5-tuple and TCP sequence number.