diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v2,2/2] bpf/selftests: Test pinning bpf timer to a core

Message ID 20231004162339.200702-3-void@manifault.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 0d7ae06860753bb30b3731302b994da071120d00
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: Add ability to pin bpf timer to calling CPU | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 4 maintainers not CCed: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org shuah@kernel.org mykolal@fb.com tero.kristo@linux.intel.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: line length of 86 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 87 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 88 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for veristat

Commit Message

David Vernet Oct. 4, 2023, 4:23 p.m. UTC
Now that we support pinning a BPF timer to the current core, we should
test it with some selftests. This patch adds two new testcases to the
timer suite, which verifies that a BPF timer both with and without
BPF_F_TIMER_ABS, can be pinned to the calling core with
BPF_F_TIMER_CPU_PIN.

Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
---
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer.c  |  4 ++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/timer.c     | 63 ++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Hou Tao Oct. 8, 2023, 4:23 a.m. UTC | #1
On 10/5/2023 12:23 AM, David Vernet wrote:
> Now that we support pinning a BPF timer to the current core, we should
> test it with some selftests. This patch adds two new testcases to the
> timer suite, which verifies that a BPF timer both with and without
> BPF_F_TIMER_ABS, can be pinned to the calling core with
> BPF_F_TIMER_CPU_PIN.
>
> Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>

Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer.c
index 290c21dbe65a..d8bc838445ec 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@  static int timer(struct timer *timer_skel)
 
 	ASSERT_EQ(timer_skel->data->callback_check, 52, "callback_check1");
 	ASSERT_EQ(timer_skel->data->callback2_check, 52, "callback2_check1");
+	ASSERT_EQ(timer_skel->bss->pinned_callback_check, 0, "pinned_callback_check1");
 
 	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(timer_skel->progs.test1);
 	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
@@ -32,6 +33,9 @@  static int timer(struct timer *timer_skel)
 	/* check that timer_cb3() was executed twice */
 	ASSERT_EQ(timer_skel->bss->abs_data, 12, "abs_data");
 
+	/* check that timer_cb_pinned() was executed twice */
+	ASSERT_EQ(timer_skel->bss->pinned_callback_check, 2, "pinned_callback_check");
+
 	/* check that there were no errors in timer execution */
 	ASSERT_EQ(timer_skel->bss->err, 0, "err");
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/timer.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/timer.c
index 9a16d95213e1..8b946c8188c6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/timer.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/timer.c
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@  struct {
 	__uint(max_entries, 1);
 	__type(key, int);
 	__type(value, struct elem);
-} abs_timer SEC(".maps");
+} abs_timer SEC(".maps"), soft_timer_pinned SEC(".maps"), abs_timer_pinned SEC(".maps");
 
 __u64 bss_data;
 __u64 abs_data;
@@ -59,6 +59,8 @@  __u64 err;
 __u64 ok;
 __u64 callback_check = 52;
 __u64 callback2_check = 52;
+__u64 pinned_callback_check;
+__s32 pinned_cpu;
 
 #define ARRAY 1
 #define HTAB 2
@@ -329,3 +331,62 @@  int BPF_PROG2(test3, int, a)
 
 	return 0;
 }
+
+/* callback for pinned timer */
+static int timer_cb_pinned(void *map, int *key, struct bpf_timer *timer)
+{
+	__s32 cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id();
+
+	if (cpu != pinned_cpu)
+		err |= 16384;
+
+	pinned_callback_check++;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void test_pinned_timer(bool soft)
+{
+	int key = 0;
+	void *map;
+	struct bpf_timer *timer;
+	__u64 flags = BPF_F_TIMER_CPU_PIN;
+	__u64 start_time;
+
+	if (soft) {
+		map = &soft_timer_pinned;
+		start_time = 0;
+	} else {
+		map = &abs_timer_pinned;
+		start_time = bpf_ktime_get_boot_ns();
+		flags |= BPF_F_TIMER_ABS;
+	}
+
+	timer = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map, &key);
+	if (timer) {
+		if (bpf_timer_init(timer, map, CLOCK_BOOTTIME) != 0)
+			err |= 4096;
+		bpf_timer_set_callback(timer, timer_cb_pinned);
+		pinned_cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id();
+		bpf_timer_start(timer, start_time + 1000, flags);
+	} else {
+		err |= 8192;
+	}
+}
+
+SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test4")
+int BPF_PROG2(test4, int, a)
+{
+	bpf_printk("test4");
+	test_pinned_timer(true);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test5")
+int BPF_PROG2(test5, int, a)
+{
+	bpf_printk("test5");
+	test_pinned_timer(false);
+
+	return 0;
+}