diff mbox series

[net] indirect_call_wrapper: Fix typo in INDIRECT_CALL_$NR kerneldoc

Message ID 20231107080117.29511-1-tklauser@distanz.ch (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series [net] indirect_call_wrapper: Fix typo in INDIRECT_CALL_$NR kerneldoc | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net
netdev/fixes_present fail Series targets non-next tree, but doesn't contain any Fixes tags
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 3811 this patch: 3811
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 1 of 1 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 1542 this patch: 1542
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 4054 this patch: 4054
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 8 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Tobias Klauser Nov. 7, 2023, 8:01 a.m. UTC
Fix a small typo in the kerneldoc comment of the INDIRECT_CALL_$NR
macro.

Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch>
---
 include/linux/indirect_call_wrapper.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Simon Horman Nov. 8, 2023, 9:45 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 09:01:17AM +0100, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> Fix a small typo in the kerneldoc comment of the INDIRECT_CALL_$NR
> macro.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch>

Hi Tobias,

I am fine with this change but I don't think it fits the guidelines for
a bug fix. So I think it would be better targeted at net-next.

	Subject: [PATCH net-next] ...

If so, the following applies:

## Form letter - net-next-closed

The merge window for v6.7 has begun and therefore net-next is closed
for new drivers, features, code refactoring and optimizations.
We are currently accepting bug fixes only.

Please repost when net-next reopens after November 12th.

RFC patches sent for review only are obviously welcome at any time.

See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#development-cycle
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/indirect_call_wrapper.h b/include/linux/indirect_call_wrapper.h
index c1c76a70a6ce..adb83a42a6b9 100644
--- a/include/linux/indirect_call_wrapper.h
+++ b/include/linux/indirect_call_wrapper.h
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ 
  *  @__VA_ARGS__: arguments for @f
  *
  * Avoid retpoline overhead for known builtin, checking @f vs each of them and
- * eventually invoking directly the builtin function. The functions are check
+ * eventually invoking directly the builtin function. The functions are checked
  * in the given order. Fallback to the indirect call.
  */
 #define INDIRECT_CALL_1(f, f1, ...)					\