Message ID | 20240129145807.8773-1-fw@strlen.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:57:50 +0100 Florian Westphal wrote: > Hello, > > This batch contains updates for your *next* tree. The nf-next in the subject is a typo, right? It's for net-next? Looks like it but better safe than sorry :)
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 06:37:29PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:57:50 +0100 Florian Westphal wrote: > > Hello, > > > > This batch contains updates for your *next* tree. > > The nf-next in the subject is a typo, right? It's for net-next? > Looks like it but better safe than sorry :) Yes, I confirm this is net-next material.
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote: > On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:57:50 +0100 Florian Westphal wrote: > > Hello, > > > > This batch contains updates for your *next* tree. > > The nf-next in the subject is a typo, right? It's for net-next? > Looks like it but better safe than sorry :) Yes, should've been *net-next*, used to typing 'nf-next'... I've updated local plumbing to refuse sending if cover letter is absent or lacks PATCH net(-next) in subject, so this should not happen again.