Context |
Check |
Description |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR |
fail
|
PR summary
|
netdev/series_format |
success
|
Posting correctly formatted
|
netdev/tree_selection |
success
|
Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
|
netdev/ynl |
success
|
Generated files up to date;
no warnings/errors;
no diff in generated;
|
netdev/fixes_present |
success
|
Fixes tag not required for -next series
|
netdev/header_inline |
success
|
No static functions without inline keyword in header files
|
netdev/build_32bit |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
|
netdev/build_tools |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 1 this patch: 1
|
netdev/cc_maintainers |
warning
|
6 maintainers not CCed: jolsa@kernel.org john.fastabend@gmail.com kpsingh@kernel.org song@kernel.org sdf@google.com haoluo@google.com
|
netdev/build_clang |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
|
netdev/verify_signedoff |
success
|
Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
|
netdev/deprecated_api |
success
|
None detected
|
netdev/check_selftest |
success
|
No net selftest shell script
|
netdev/verify_fixes |
success
|
No Fixes tag
|
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
|
netdev/checkpatch |
warning
|
WARNING: line length of 83 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 84 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 86 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 91 exceeds 80 columns
|
netdev/build_clang_rust |
success
|
No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
|
netdev/kdoc |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
|
netdev/source_inline |
success
|
Was 0 now: 0
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 |
fail
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17 and -O2 optimization
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 |
success
|
Logs for Lint
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 |
success
|
Logs for ShellCheck
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 |
success
|
Logs for Unittests
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 |
success
|
Logs for Validate matrix.py
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 |
success
|
Logs for set-matrix
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 |
success
|
Logs for set-matrix
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 |
fail
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 |
fail
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 |
fail
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 |
fail
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 |
fail
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18 and -O2 optimization
|
@@ -147,6 +147,25 @@ static int probe_kern_btf_datasec(int token_fd)
strs, sizeof(strs), token_fd));
}
+static int probe_kern_btf_qmark_datasec(int token_fd)
+{
+ static const char strs[] = "\0x\0?.data";
+ /* static int a; */
+ __u32 types[] = {
+ /* int */
+ BTF_TYPE_INT_ENC(0, BTF_INT_SIGNED, 0, 32, 4), /* [1] */
+ /* VAR x */ /* [2] */
+ BTF_TYPE_ENC(1, BTF_INFO_ENC(BTF_KIND_VAR, 0, 0), 1),
+ BTF_VAR_STATIC,
+ /* DATASEC ?.data */ /* [3] */
+ BTF_TYPE_ENC(3, BTF_INFO_ENC(BTF_KIND_DATASEC, 0, 1), 4),
+ BTF_VAR_SECINFO_ENC(2, 0, 4),
+ };
+
+ return probe_fd(libbpf__load_raw_btf((char *)types, sizeof(types),
+ strs, sizeof(strs), token_fd));
+}
+
static int probe_kern_btf_float(int token_fd)
{
static const char strs[] = "\0float";
@@ -534,6 +553,9 @@ static struct kern_feature_desc {
[FEAT_ARG_CTX_TAG] = {
"kernel-side __arg_ctx tag", probe_kern_arg_ctx_tag,
},
+ [FEAT_BTF_QMARK_DATASEC] = {
+ "BTF DATASEC names starting from '?'", probe_kern_btf_qmark_datasec,
+ },
};
bool feat_supported(struct kern_feature_cache *cache, enum kern_feature_id feat_id)
@@ -2828,6 +2828,11 @@ static bool section_have_execinstr(struct bpf_object *obj, int idx)
return sh->sh_flags & SHF_EXECINSTR;
}
+static bool starts_with_qmark(const char *s)
+{
+ return s && s[0] == '?';
+}
+
static bool btf_needs_sanitization(struct bpf_object *obj)
{
bool has_func_global = kernel_supports(obj, FEAT_BTF_GLOBAL_FUNC);
@@ -2837,9 +2842,10 @@ static bool btf_needs_sanitization(struct bpf_object *obj)
bool has_decl_tag = kernel_supports(obj, FEAT_BTF_DECL_TAG);
bool has_type_tag = kernel_supports(obj, FEAT_BTF_TYPE_TAG);
bool has_enum64 = kernel_supports(obj, FEAT_BTF_ENUM64);
+ bool has_qmark_datasec = kernel_supports(obj, FEAT_BTF_QMARK_DATASEC);
return !has_func || !has_datasec || !has_func_global || !has_float ||
- !has_decl_tag || !has_type_tag || !has_enum64;
+ !has_decl_tag || !has_type_tag || !has_enum64 || !has_qmark_datasec;
}
static int bpf_object__sanitize_btf(struct bpf_object *obj, struct btf *btf)
@@ -2851,6 +2857,7 @@ static int bpf_object__sanitize_btf(struct bpf_object *obj, struct btf *btf)
bool has_decl_tag = kernel_supports(obj, FEAT_BTF_DECL_TAG);
bool has_type_tag = kernel_supports(obj, FEAT_BTF_TYPE_TAG);
bool has_enum64 = kernel_supports(obj, FEAT_BTF_ENUM64);
+ bool has_qmark_datasec = kernel_supports(obj, FEAT_BTF_QMARK_DATASEC);
int enum64_placeholder_id = 0;
struct btf_type *t;
int i, j, vlen;
@@ -2876,6 +2883,8 @@ static int bpf_object__sanitize_btf(struct bpf_object *obj, struct btf *btf)
char *name;
name = (char *)btf__name_by_offset(btf, t->name_off);
+ if (*name == '?')
+ *name++ = '_';
while (*name) {
if (*name == '.')
*name = '_';
@@ -2892,6 +2901,25 @@ static int bpf_object__sanitize_btf(struct bpf_object *obj, struct btf *btf)
vt = (void *)btf__type_by_id(btf, v->type);
m->name_off = vt->name_off;
}
+ } else if (!has_qmark_datasec && btf_is_datasec(t) &&
+ starts_with_qmark(btf__name_by_offset(btf, t->name_off))) {
+ /* remove '?' prefix and add '.optional' suffix for
+ * DATASEC names staring from '?':
+ *
+ * DATASEC ?.foo -> DATASEC .foo.optional
+ */
+ const char *name;
+ char buf[256];
+ int str;
+
+ name = btf__name_by_offset(btf, t->name_off);
+ snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s.optional", &name[1] /* skip '?' */);
+ str = btf__add_str(btf, buf);
+ if (str < 0)
+ return str;
+
+ t = (struct btf_type *)btf__type_by_id(btf, i);
+ t->name_off = str;
} else if (!has_func && btf_is_func_proto(t)) {
/* replace FUNC_PROTO with ENUM */
vlen = btf_vlen(t);
@@ -374,6 +374,8 @@ enum kern_feature_id {
FEAT_UPROBE_MULTI_LINK,
/* Kernel supports arg:ctx tag (__arg_ctx) for global subprogs natively */
FEAT_ARG_CTX_TAG,
+ /* Kernel supports '?' at the front of datasec names */
+ FEAT_BTF_QMARK_DATASEC,
__FEAT_CNT,
};
Optional struct_ops maps are defined using question mark at the start of the section name, e.g.: SEC("?.struct_ops") struct test_ops optional_map = { ... }; This commit teaches libbpf to detect if kernel allows '?' prefix in datasec names, and if it doesn't then to rewrite such names by removing '?' prefix and adding ".optional" suffix. For example: DATASEC ?.struct_ops -> DATASEC .struct_ops.optional Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> --- tools/lib/bpf/features.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)