Context |
Check |
Description |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR |
fail
|
PR summary
|
netdev/series_format |
success
|
Posting correctly formatted
|
netdev/tree_selection |
success
|
Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
|
netdev/ynl |
success
|
Generated files up to date;
no warnings/errors;
no diff in generated;
|
netdev/fixes_present |
success
|
Fixes tag not required for -next series
|
netdev/header_inline |
success
|
No static functions without inline keyword in header files
|
netdev/build_32bit |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 1054 this patch: 1054
|
netdev/build_tools |
success
|
No tools touched, skip
|
netdev/cc_maintainers |
warning
|
6 maintainers not CCed: jolsa@kernel.org john.fastabend@gmail.com kpsingh@kernel.org song@kernel.org sdf@google.com haoluo@google.com
|
netdev/build_clang |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 1066 this patch: 1066
|
netdev/verify_signedoff |
success
|
Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
|
netdev/deprecated_api |
success
|
None detected
|
netdev/check_selftest |
success
|
No net selftest shell script
|
netdev/verify_fixes |
success
|
No Fixes tag
|
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 1071 this patch: 1071
|
netdev/checkpatch |
warning
|
WARNING: line length of 81 exceeds 80 columns
|
netdev/build_clang_rust |
success
|
No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
|
netdev/kdoc |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
|
netdev/source_inline |
success
|
Was 0 now: 0
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 |
fail
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17 and -O2 optimization
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 |
success
|
Logs for Lint
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 |
success
|
Logs for ShellCheck
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 |
success
|
Logs for Unittests
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 |
success
|
Logs for Validate matrix.py
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 |
success
|
Logs for set-matrix
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 |
success
|
Logs for set-matrix
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 |
fail
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 |
fail
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 |
fail
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 |
fail
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 |
fail
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18 and -O2 optimization
|
@@ -761,12 +761,13 @@ static bool btf_name_offset_valid(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset)
return offset < btf->hdr.str_len;
}
-static bool __btf_name_char_ok(char c, bool first)
+static bool __btf_name_char_ok(char c, bool first, bool allow_qmark)
{
if ((first ? !isalpha(c) :
!isalnum(c)) &&
c != '_' &&
- c != '.')
+ c != '.' &&
+ (allow_qmark && first ? c != '?' : true))
return false;
return true;
}
@@ -783,20 +784,20 @@ static const char *btf_str_by_offset(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset)
return NULL;
}
-static bool __btf_name_valid(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset)
+static bool __btf_name_valid(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset, bool allow_qmark)
{
/* offset must be valid */
const char *src = btf_str_by_offset(btf, offset);
const char *src_limit;
- if (!__btf_name_char_ok(*src, true))
+ if (!__btf_name_char_ok(*src, true, allow_qmark))
return false;
/* set a limit on identifier length */
src_limit = src + KSYM_NAME_LEN;
src++;
while (*src && src < src_limit) {
- if (!__btf_name_char_ok(*src, false))
+ if (!__btf_name_char_ok(*src, false, false))
return false;
src++;
}
@@ -806,12 +807,12 @@ static bool __btf_name_valid(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset)
static bool btf_name_valid_identifier(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset)
{
- return __btf_name_valid(btf, offset);
+ return __btf_name_valid(btf, offset, false);
}
static bool btf_name_valid_section(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset)
{
- return __btf_name_valid(btf, offset);
+ return __btf_name_valid(btf, offset, true);
}
static const char *__btf_name_by_offset(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset)
@@ -4481,7 +4482,7 @@ static s32 btf_var_check_meta(struct btf_verifier_env *env,
}
if (!t->name_off ||
- !__btf_name_valid(env->btf, t->name_off)) {
+ !btf_name_valid_identifier(env->btf, t->name_off)) {
btf_verifier_log_type(env, t, "Invalid name");
return -EINVAL;
}
Currently kernel does not allow question marks in BTF names. This commit makes an exception, allowing first character of the DATASEC name to be a question mark. The intent is to allow libbpf to use SEC("?.struct_ops") to identify struct_ops maps that are optional, e.g. like in the following BPF code: SEC("?.struct_ops") struct test_ops optional_map = { ... }; Which yields the following BTF: ... [13] DATASEC '?.struct_ops' size=0 vlen=... ... To load such BTF libbpf rewrites DATASEC name before load. After this patch the rewrite won't be necessary. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> --- kernel/bpf/btf.c | 17 +++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)