diff mbox series

[net-next,v2,06/21] rxrpc: Remove atomic handling on some fields only used in I/O thread

Message ID 20240304084322.705539-7-dhowells@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series rxrpc: Miscellaneous changes and make use of MSG_SPLICE_PAGES | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format fail Series longer than 15 patches (and no cover letter)
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net-next
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 940 this patch: 940
netdev/build_tools success No tools touched, skip
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 7 of 7 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 956 this patch: 956
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 956 this patch: 956
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 42 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/contest success net-next-2024-03-05--06-00 (tests: 891)

Commit Message

David Howells March 4, 2024, 8:43 a.m. UTC
call->tx_transmitted and call->acks_prev_seq don't need to be managed with
cmpxchg() and barriers as it's only used within the singular I/O thread.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
---
 net/rxrpc/call_event.c | 10 ++++------
 net/rxrpc/output.c     |  8 +++-----
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/rxrpc/call_event.c b/net/rxrpc/call_event.c
index 84eedbb49fcb..1184518dcdb8 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/call_event.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/call_event.c
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@  void rxrpc_resend(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct sk_buff *ack_skb)
 	struct rxrpc_skb_priv *sp;
 	struct rxrpc_txbuf *txb;
 	unsigned long resend_at;
-	rxrpc_seq_t transmitted = READ_ONCE(call->tx_transmitted);
+	rxrpc_seq_t transmitted = call->tx_transmitted;
 	ktime_t now, max_age, oldest, ack_ts;
 	bool unacked = false;
 	unsigned int i;
@@ -184,16 +184,14 @@  void rxrpc_resend(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct sk_buff *ack_skb)
 	 * seen.  Anything between the soft-ACK table and that point will get
 	 * ACK'd or NACK'd in due course, so don't worry about it here; here we
 	 * need to consider retransmitting anything beyond that point.
-	 *
-	 * Note that ACK for a packet can beat the update of tx_transmitted.
 	 */
-	if (after_eq(READ_ONCE(call->acks_prev_seq), READ_ONCE(call->tx_transmitted)))
+	if (after_eq(call->acks_prev_seq, call->tx_transmitted))
 		goto no_further_resend;
 
 	list_for_each_entry_from(txb, &call->tx_buffer, call_link) {
-		if (before_eq(txb->seq, READ_ONCE(call->acks_prev_seq)))
+		if (before_eq(txb->seq, call->acks_prev_seq))
 			continue;
-		if (after(txb->seq, READ_ONCE(call->tx_transmitted)))
+		if (after(txb->seq, call->tx_transmitted))
 			break; /* Not transmitted yet */
 
 		if (ack && ack->reason == RXRPC_ACK_PING_RESPONSE &&
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/output.c b/net/rxrpc/output.c
index 2386b01b2231..1e039b6f4494 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/output.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/output.c
@@ -397,12 +397,10 @@  int rxrpc_send_data_packet(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct rxrpc_txbuf *txb)
 
 	/* Track what we've attempted to transmit at least once so that the
 	 * retransmission algorithm doesn't try to resend what we haven't sent
-	 * yet.  However, this can race as we can receive an ACK before we get
-	 * to this point.  But, OTOH, if we won't get an ACK mentioning this
-	 * packet unless the far side received it (though it could have
-	 * discarded it anyway and NAK'd it).
+	 * yet.
 	 */
-	cmpxchg(&call->tx_transmitted, txb->seq - 1, txb->seq);
+	if (txb->seq == call->tx_transmitted + 1)
+		call->tx_transmitted = txb->seq;
 
 	/* send the packet with the don't fragment bit set if we currently
 	 * think it's small enough */