From patchwork Wed Mar 6 00:06:36 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: David Howells X-Patchwork-Id: 13583129 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66ACB81E for ; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 00:07:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709683639; cv=none; b=bueIfGXi/w4fKEsS+Sbh9yn401vI0vd5D1c7w3fRbFJd7hyEK8gwPEnYbOlBoYbzgjagZJhrOk/Nu/42SFiBVh9wk896UmAxzRXbRnXce2yAz9PlGjU4/Dj+ziHTXqWBJAxk/5fJoNVk+Oqta6GkIFFhXcgKRqmmBtvpCr/Fb3k= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709683639; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0raf8PRlraWnPhbn6SRbKPcBod2VJHcvfxva3reVfio=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=pnoepx6jFhR0/rF5gibJbLSBv7M9TcTieHkEjaPAdtPAuzN3OUNZssX4wLEHGPboKTJVDRrA1Hvn5nVpq8qdhqDxCEKeaT7h6rC9cgHYX+f/OB7IIuEDQ7Xq3oBa+MwE9OUCb9Cam4xxCZHjKIqVEElhjUFUanrjWtrmMCcHGu8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=T7miJADY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="T7miJADY" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1709683636; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Ol9Zm5BaokJG1LA5SA9PnxgRsE5CFPeI5pD0RB5to08=; b=T7miJADYOmr4WW7Ik4WW2ceNybMUJQs9uP5EFvSwf6dOfc+ewCN3J5ouaCvEGMe5Q3Zyvh FbgZ6Uh04+sB7eZTm6o/5xZRQyEul8XkrnRCFRVfV83ybNd0O611N2W9ZedchBosrTEKg8 xwzGorgWLynhq3zCqkffnn3QS2CzjIs= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-616-ItfqnHTpO-Sof-a39qoQcg-1; Tue, 05 Mar 2024 19:07:13 -0500 X-MC-Unique: ItfqnHTpO-Sof-a39qoQcg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1869C1869BBF; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 00:07:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.com (unknown [10.42.28.114]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64D916A9B; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 00:07:11 +0000 (UTC) From: David Howells To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: David Howells , Marc Dionne , Simon Horman , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH net-next v3 06/21] rxrpc: Remove atomic handling on some fields only used in I/O thread Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 00:06:36 +0000 Message-ID: <20240306000655.1100294-7-dhowells@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20240306000655.1100294-1-dhowells@redhat.com> References: <20240306000655.1100294-1-dhowells@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.5 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org call->tx_transmitted and call->acks_prev_seq don't need to be managed with cmpxchg() and barriers as it's only used within the singular I/O thread. Signed-off-by: David Howells cc: Marc Dionne cc: "David S. Miller" cc: Eric Dumazet cc: Jakub Kicinski cc: Paolo Abeni cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org --- net/rxrpc/call_event.c | 10 ++++------ net/rxrpc/output.c | 8 +++----- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/rxrpc/call_event.c b/net/rxrpc/call_event.c index 84eedbb49fcb..1184518dcdb8 100644 --- a/net/rxrpc/call_event.c +++ b/net/rxrpc/call_event.c @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ void rxrpc_resend(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct sk_buff *ack_skb) struct rxrpc_skb_priv *sp; struct rxrpc_txbuf *txb; unsigned long resend_at; - rxrpc_seq_t transmitted = READ_ONCE(call->tx_transmitted); + rxrpc_seq_t transmitted = call->tx_transmitted; ktime_t now, max_age, oldest, ack_ts; bool unacked = false; unsigned int i; @@ -184,16 +184,14 @@ void rxrpc_resend(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct sk_buff *ack_skb) * seen. Anything between the soft-ACK table and that point will get * ACK'd or NACK'd in due course, so don't worry about it here; here we * need to consider retransmitting anything beyond that point. - * - * Note that ACK for a packet can beat the update of tx_transmitted. */ - if (after_eq(READ_ONCE(call->acks_prev_seq), READ_ONCE(call->tx_transmitted))) + if (after_eq(call->acks_prev_seq, call->tx_transmitted)) goto no_further_resend; list_for_each_entry_from(txb, &call->tx_buffer, call_link) { - if (before_eq(txb->seq, READ_ONCE(call->acks_prev_seq))) + if (before_eq(txb->seq, call->acks_prev_seq)) continue; - if (after(txb->seq, READ_ONCE(call->tx_transmitted))) + if (after(txb->seq, call->tx_transmitted)) break; /* Not transmitted yet */ if (ack && ack->reason == RXRPC_ACK_PING_RESPONSE && diff --git a/net/rxrpc/output.c b/net/rxrpc/output.c index 2386b01b2231..1e039b6f4494 100644 --- a/net/rxrpc/output.c +++ b/net/rxrpc/output.c @@ -397,12 +397,10 @@ int rxrpc_send_data_packet(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct rxrpc_txbuf *txb) /* Track what we've attempted to transmit at least once so that the * retransmission algorithm doesn't try to resend what we haven't sent - * yet. However, this can race as we can receive an ACK before we get - * to this point. But, OTOH, if we won't get an ACK mentioning this - * packet unless the far side received it (though it could have - * discarded it anyway and NAK'd it). + * yet. */ - cmpxchg(&call->tx_transmitted, txb->seq - 1, txb->seq); + if (txb->seq == call->tx_transmitted + 1) + call->tx_transmitted = txb->seq; /* send the packet with the don't fragment bit set if we currently * think it's small enough */