| Message ID | 20240424-fix-oob-read-v2-5-f1f1b53a10f4@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Ensure the copied buf is NUL terminated | expand |
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 09:44:22PM +0700, Bui Quang Minh wrote: > Currently, we allocate a lbuf-sized kernel buffer and copy lbuf from > userspace to that buffer. Later, we use scanf on this buffer but we don't > ensure that the string is terminated inside the buffer, this can lead to > OOB read when using scanf. Fix this issue by using memdup_user_nul instead. > > Fixes: a4f17cc72671 ("s390/cio: add CRW inject functionality") > Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/s390/cio/cio_inject.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 09:44:22PM +0700, Bui Quang Minh wrote: > Currently, we allocate a lbuf-sized kernel buffer and copy lbuf from > userspace to that buffer. Later, we use scanf on this buffer but we don't > ensure that the string is terminated inside the buffer, this can lead to > OOB read when using scanf. Fix this issue by using memdup_user_nul instead. > > Fixes: a4f17cc72671 ("s390/cio: add CRW inject functionality") > Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/s390/cio/cio_inject.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Applied, thanks!
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 05:16:56PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> Applied, thanks!
Hi Jakub,
I just want to make sure you do not have plans to pull this patch
via the net tree, right? (I schedulled it for the s390 tree already).
Thanks!
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 12:10:35 +0200 Alexander Gordeev wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 05:16:56PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote: > > Applied, thanks! > > Hi Jakub, > > I just want to make sure you do not have plans to pull this patch > via the net tree, right? (I schedulled it for the s390 tree already). Yes, go for it. I picked 1, 2 and 6, no interest in the other 3 :)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/cio_inject.c b/drivers/s390/cio/cio_inject.c index 8613fa937237..a2e771ebae8e 100644 --- a/drivers/s390/cio/cio_inject.c +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/cio_inject.c @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static ssize_t crw_inject_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, return -EINVAL; } - buffer = vmemdup_user(buf, lbuf); + buffer = memdup_user_nul(buf, lbuf); if (IS_ERR(buffer)) return -ENOMEM;
Currently, we allocate a lbuf-sized kernel buffer and copy lbuf from userspace to that buffer. Later, we use scanf on this buffer but we don't ensure that the string is terminated inside the buffer, this can lead to OOB read when using scanf. Fix this issue by using memdup_user_nul instead. Fixes: a4f17cc72671 ("s390/cio: add CRW inject functionality") Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@gmail.com> --- drivers/s390/cio/cio_inject.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)