Context |
Check |
Description |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 |
success
|
Logs for ShellCheck
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 |
success
|
Logs for Lint
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 |
success
|
Logs for Unittests
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 |
success
|
Logs for Validate matrix.py
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 |
success
|
Logs for set-matrix
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR |
fail
|
merge-conflict
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 |
success
|
Logs for set-matrix
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17 and -O2 optimization
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18 and -O2 optimization
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
|
@@ -34,4 +34,298 @@ int recvmsg6_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
return 0;
}
+SEC("cgroup/recvmsg_unix")
+__success
+int recvmsg_unix_good_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/recvmsg_unix")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=0 smax=0 should have been in [1, 1]")
+int recvmsg_unix_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/sendmsg4")
+__success
+int sendmsg4_good_return_code_0(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/sendmsg4")
+__success
+int sendmsg4_good_return_code_1(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/sendmsg4")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=2 smax=2 should have been in [0, 1]")
+int sendmsg4_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 2;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/sendmsg6")
+__success
+int sendmsg6_good_return_code_0(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/sendmsg6")
+__success
+int sendmsg6_good_return_code_1(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/sendmsg6")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=2 smax=2 should have been in [0, 1]")
+int sendmsg6_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 2;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/sendmsg_unix")
+__success
+int sendmsg_unix_good_return_code_0(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/sendmsg_unix")
+__success
+int sendmsg_unix_good_return_code_1(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/sendmsg_unix")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=2 smax=2 should have been in [0, 1]")
+int sendmsg_unix_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 2;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/getpeername4")
+__success
+int getpeername4_good_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/getpeername4")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=0 smax=0 should have been in [1, 1]")
+int getpeername4_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/getpeername6")
+__success
+int getpeername6_good_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/getpeername6")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=0 smax=0 should have been in [1, 1]")
+int getpeername6_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/getpeername_unix")
+__success
+int getpeername_unix_good_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/getpeername_unix")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=0 smax=0 should have been in [1, 1]")
+int getpeername_unix_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/getsockname4")
+__success
+int getsockname4_good_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/getsockname4")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=0 smax=0 should have been in [1, 1]")
+int getsockname4_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/getsockname6")
+__success
+int getsockname6_good_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/getsockname6")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=0 smax=0 should have been in [1, 1]")
+int getsockname6_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/getsockname_unix")
+__success
+int getsockname_unix_good_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/getsockname_unix")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=0 smax=0 should have been in [1, 1]")
+int getsockname_unix_unix_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/bind4")
+__success
+int bind4_good_return_code_0(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/bind4")
+__success
+int bind4_good_return_code_1(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/bind4")
+__success
+int bind4_good_return_code_2(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 2;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/bind4")
+__success
+int bind4_good_return_code_3(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 3;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/bind4")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=4 smax=4 should have been in [0, 3]")
+int bind4_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 4;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/bind6")
+__success
+int bind6_good_return_code_0(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/bind6")
+__success
+int bind6_good_return_code_1(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/bind6")
+__success
+int bind6_good_return_code_2(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 2;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/bind6")
+__success
+int bind6_good_return_code_3(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 3;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/bind6")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=4 smax=4 should have been in [0, 3]")
+int bind6_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 4;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/connect4")
+__success
+int connect4_good_return_code_0(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/connect4")
+__success
+int connect4_good_return_code_1(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/connect4")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=2 smax=2 should have been in [0, 1]")
+int connect4_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 2;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/connect6")
+__success
+int connect6_good_return_code_0(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/connect6")
+__success
+int connect6_good_return_code_1(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/connect6")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=2 smax=2 should have been in [0, 1]")
+int connect6_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 2;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/connect_unix")
+__success
+int connect_unix_good_return_code_0(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/connect_unix")
+__success
+int connect_unix_good_return_code_1(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/connect_unix")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=2 smax=2 should have been in [0, 1]")
+int connect_unix_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+ return 2;
+}
+
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
This patch expands verifier coverage for program return values to cover bind, connect, sendmsg, getsockname, and getpeername hooks. It also rounds out the recvmsg coverage by adding test cases for recvmsg_unix hooks. Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com> --- .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_sock_addr.c | 294 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 294 insertions(+)