diff mbox series

bpf: Use an UNUSED id for bpf_session_cookie without FPROBE

Message ID 20240529124412.VZAF98oL@linutronix.de (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: Use an UNUSED id for bpf_session_cookie without FPROBE | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format warning Single patches do not need cover letters; Target tree name not specified in the subject
netdev/tree_selection success Guessed tree name to be net-next
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 914 this patch: 914
netdev/build_tools success No tools touched, skip
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 5 maintainers not CCed: kpsingh@kernel.org song@kernel.org martin.lau@linux.dev eddyz87@gmail.com yonghong.song@linux.dev
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 906 this patch: 906
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 918 this patch: 918
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: Please use correct Fixes: style 'Fixes: <12 chars of sha1> ("<title line>")' - ie: 'Fixes: 5c919acef851 ("bpf: Add support for kprobe session cookie")'
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Sebastian Andrzej Siewior May 29, 2024, 12:44 p.m. UTC
bpf_session_cookie() is only available with CONFIG_FPROBE=y leading to
an unresolved symbol otherwise.

Use BTF_ID_UNUSED instead of bpf_session_cookie for CONFIG_FPROBE=n.

Fixes: 5c919acef8514 ("bpf: Add support for kprobe session cookie")
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

Comments

Alexei Starovoitov May 29, 2024, 4:18 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 5:44 AM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> bpf_session_cookie() is only available with CONFIG_FPROBE=y leading to
> an unresolved symbol otherwise.
>
> Use BTF_ID_UNUSED instead of bpf_session_cookie for CONFIG_FPROBE=n.
>
> Fixes: 5c919acef8514 ("bpf: Add support for kprobe session cookie")
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
>  kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 77da1f438becc..436f72bfcb9b9 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -11124,7 +11124,11 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_iter_css_task_new)
>  #else
>  BTF_ID_UNUSED
>  #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FPROBE
>  BTF_ID(func, bpf_session_cookie)
> +#else
> +BTF_ID_UNUSED
> +#endif

Instead of this fix..
Jiri,
maybe remove ifdef CONFIG_FPROBE hiding of this kfunc
in kernel/tace/bpf_trace.c ?
The less ifdef-s the better. imo
Jiri Olsa May 29, 2024, 7:34 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 09:18:48AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 5:44 AM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
> <bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > bpf_session_cookie() is only available with CONFIG_FPROBE=y leading to
> > an unresolved symbol otherwise.
> >
> > Use BTF_ID_UNUSED instead of bpf_session_cookie for CONFIG_FPROBE=n.
> >
> > Fixes: 5c919acef8514 ("bpf: Add support for kprobe session cookie")
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> > ---
> >  kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > index 77da1f438becc..436f72bfcb9b9 100644
> > --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > @@ -11124,7 +11124,11 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_iter_css_task_new)
> >  #else
> >  BTF_ID_UNUSED
> >  #endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_FPROBE
> >  BTF_ID(func, bpf_session_cookie)
> > +#else
> > +BTF_ID_UNUSED
> > +#endif
> 
> Instead of this fix..
> Jiri,
> maybe remove ifdef CONFIG_FPROBE hiding of this kfunc
> in kernel/tace/bpf_trace.c ?
> The less ifdef-s the better. imo

yes, that seems to work

Sebastian, do you want to send it as v2 or should I post it?

thanks,
jirka


---
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index f5154c051d2c..cc90d56732eb 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -3519,7 +3519,6 @@ static u64 bpf_uprobe_multi_entry_ip(struct bpf_run_ctx *ctx)
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_UPROBES */
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_FPROBE
 __bpf_kfunc_start_defs();
 
 __bpf_kfunc bool bpf_session_is_return(void)
@@ -3568,4 +3567,3 @@ static int __init bpf_kprobe_multi_kfuncs_init(void)
 }
 
 late_initcall(bpf_kprobe_multi_kfuncs_init);
-#endif
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior May 31, 2024, 7:15 a.m. UTC | #3
On 2024-05-29 21:34:25 [+0200], Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_FPROBE
> > >  BTF_ID(func, bpf_session_cookie)
> > > +#else
> > > +BTF_ID_UNUSED
> > > +#endif
> > 
> > Instead of this fix..
> > Jiri,
> > maybe remove ifdef CONFIG_FPROBE hiding of this kfunc
> > in kernel/tace/bpf_trace.c ?
> > The less ifdef-s the better. imo
> 
> yes, that seems to work
>
> Sebastian, do you want to send it as v2 or should I post it?

Now that I look again, ifdef CONFIG_FPROBE isn't enough it requires
additionally CONFIG_UPROBE_EVENTS.
So the suggested snippet does not work if CONFIG_UPROBE_EVENTS is not
enabled.

> thanks,
> jirka

Sebastian
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 77da1f438becc..436f72bfcb9b9 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -11124,7 +11124,11 @@  BTF_ID(func, bpf_iter_css_task_new)
 #else
 BTF_ID_UNUSED
 #endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_FPROBE
 BTF_ID(func, bpf_session_cookie)
+#else
+BTF_ID_UNUSED
+#endif
 
 static bool is_kfunc_ret_null(struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta)
 {