diff mbox series

[RFC,bpf-next,2/2] selftests/bpf: Add testcase for updating attached freplace prog to PROG_ARRAY map

Message ID 20240602122421.50892-3-hffilwlqm@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State RFC
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: Fix updating attached freplace to PROG_ARRAY map | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 850 this patch: 850
netdev/build_tools success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 12 maintainers not CCed: jolsa@kernel.org shuah@kernel.org john.fastabend@gmail.com haoluo@google.com song@kernel.org mykolal@fb.com martin.lau@linux.dev yonghong.song@linux.dev eddyz87@gmail.com sdf@google.com kpsingh@kernel.org linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 854 this patch: 854
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 859 this patch: 859
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: Use of volatile is usually wrong: see Documentation/process/volatile-considered-harmful.rst WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating? WARNING: line length of 84 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 87 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Leon Hwang June 2, 2024, 12:24 p.m. UTC
Add a selftest to confirm the issue, panic when update attached freplace
prog to PROG_ARRAY map, has been fixed.

cd tools/testing/selftests/bpf; ./test_progs -t tailcall
324/18  tailcalls/tailcall_freplace:OK
324     tailcalls:OK
Summary: 1/18 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c      | 82 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_freplace.c   | 34 ++++++++
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_bpf2bpf.c  | 21 +++++
 3 files changed, 137 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_freplace.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_bpf2bpf.c
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
index 59993fc9c0d7e..d0c6f0d2a4233 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ 
 #include <test_progs.h>
 #include <network_helpers.h>
 #include "tailcall_poke.skel.h"
+#include "tailcall_freplace.skel.h"
+#include "tc_bpf2bpf.skel.h"
 
 
 /* test_tailcall_1 checks basic functionality by patching multiple locations
@@ -1187,6 +1189,84 @@  static void test_tailcall_poke(void)
 	tailcall_poke__destroy(call);
 }
 
+static void test_tailcall_freplace(void)
+{
+	struct tailcall_freplace *skel = NULL;
+	struct tc_bpf2bpf *tgt_skel = NULL;
+	struct bpf_link *freplace = NULL;
+	struct bpf_map *data_map;
+	int prog_fd, data_fd;
+	char buff[128] = {};
+	__u32 key = 0;
+	int err, val;
+
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
+		    .data_in = buff,
+		    .data_size_in = sizeof(buff),
+		    .repeat = 1,
+	);
+
+	skel = tailcall_freplace__open();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "open skel"))
+		goto out;
+
+	tgt_skel = tc_bpf2bpf__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(tgt_skel, "open tgt_skel"))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = bpf_program__set_attach_target(skel->progs.entry,
+					     bpf_program__fd(tgt_skel->progs.entry),
+					     "subprog");
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "set_attach_target"))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = tailcall_freplace__load(skel);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "load skel"))
+		goto out;
+
+	freplace = bpf_program__attach_freplace(skel->progs.entry,
+						bpf_program__fd(tgt_skel->progs.entry),
+						"subprog");
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(freplace, "attatch_freplace"))
+		goto out;
+
+	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.entry);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(prog_fd, 0, "prog_fd"))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.jmp_table), &key,
+				  &prog_fd, BPF_ANY);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "update jmp_table"))
+		goto out;
+
+	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(tgt_skel->progs.entry);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(prog_fd, 0, "prog_fd"))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run");
+	ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 1, "test_run retval");
+
+	data_map = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(skel->obj, ".bss");
+	if (!ASSERT_FALSE(!data_map || !bpf_map__is_internal(data_map),
+			  "find .bss map"))
+		goto out;
+
+	data_fd = bpf_map__fd(data_map);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(data_fd, 0, ".bss map_fd"))
+		goto out;
+
+	key = 0;
+	err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(data_fd, &key, &val);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "tailcall count");
+	ASSERT_EQ(val, 34, "tailcall count");
+
+out:
+	bpf_link__destroy(freplace);
+	tc_bpf2bpf__destroy(tgt_skel);
+	tailcall_freplace__destroy(skel);
+}
+
 void test_tailcalls(void)
 {
 	if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_1"))
@@ -1223,4 +1303,6 @@  void test_tailcalls(void)
 		test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_fentry_entry();
 	if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_poke"))
 		test_tailcall_poke();
+	if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_freplace"))
+		test_tailcall_freplace();
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_freplace.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_freplace.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..fe25343e9d2fa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_freplace.c
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_legacy.h"
+
+struct {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY);
+	__uint(max_entries, 1);
+	__uint(key_size, sizeof(__u32));
+	__uint(value_size, sizeof(__u32));
+} jmp_table SEC(".maps");
+
+int count = 0;
+
+__noinline int
+subprog(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	volatile int ret = 1;
+
+	count++;
+
+	bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 0);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+SEC("freplace")
+int entry(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	return subprog(skb);
+}
+
+char __license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_bpf2bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_bpf2bpf.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..54abda6c3246e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_bpf2bpf.c
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_legacy.h"
+
+__noinline int
+subprog(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	volatile int ret = 1;
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+int entry(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	return subprog(skb);
+}
+
+char __license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";