diff mbox series

[v2] xdp: remove WARN() from __xdp_reg_mem_model()

Message ID 20240624080747.36858-1-d.dulov@aladdin.ru (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit de081f82e810dec3302d1490bb7388c5bd1b76fc
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [v2] xdp: remove WARN() from __xdp_reg_mem_model() | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format warning Single patches do not need cover letters; Target tree name not specified in the subject
netdev/tree_selection success Guessed tree name to be net-next
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 842 this patch: 842
netdev/build_tools success No tools touched, skip
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 9 of 9 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 849 this patch: 849
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 852 this patch: 852
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: Possible repeated word: 'Google'
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 pending Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
netdev/contest fail net-next-2024-06-24--09-00 (tests: 664)

Commit Message

Daniil Dulov June 24, 2024, 8:07 a.m. UTC
Syzkaller reports a warning in __xdp_reg_mem_model().

The warning occurs only if __mem_id_init_hash_table() returns
an error. It returns the error in two cases:

  1. memory allocation fails;
  2. rhashtable_init() fails when some fields of rhashtable_params
     struct are not initialized properly.

The second case cannot happen since there is a static const
rhashtable_params struct with valid fields. So, warning is only triggered
when there is a problem with memory allocation.

Thus, there is no sense in using WARN() to handle this error and it can be
safely removed.

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5065 at net/core/xdp.c:299 __xdp_reg_mem_model+0x2d9/0x650 net/core/xdp.c:299

CPU: 0 PID: 5065 Comm: syz-executor883 Not tainted 6.8.0-syzkaller-05271-gf99c5f563c17 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024
RIP: 0010:__xdp_reg_mem_model+0x2d9/0x650 net/core/xdp.c:299

Call Trace:
 xdp_reg_mem_model+0x22/0x40 net/core/xdp.c:344
 xdp_test_run_setup net/bpf/test_run.c:188 [inline]
 bpf_test_run_xdp_live+0x365/0x1e90 net/bpf/test_run.c:377
 bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0x813/0x11b0 net/bpf/test_run.c:1267
 bpf_prog_test_run+0x33a/0x3b0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4240
 __sys_bpf+0x48d/0x810 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5649
 __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5738 [inline]
 __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736 [inline]
 __x64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736
 do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.

Fixes: 8d5d88527587 ("xdp: rhashtable with allocator ID to pointer mapping")
Signed-off-by: Daniil Dulov <d.dulov@aladdin.ru>
Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
---
v2: Removed unnecessary brackets as Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
suggested, also added Acked-by Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240617162708.492159-1-d.dulov@aladdin.ru/

 net/core/xdp.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org June 24, 2024, 10:10 a.m. UTC | #1
Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>:

On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:07:47 +0300 you wrote:
> Syzkaller reports a warning in __xdp_reg_mem_model().
> 
> The warning occurs only if __mem_id_init_hash_table() returns
> an error. It returns the error in two cases:
> 
>   1. memory allocation fails;
>   2. rhashtable_init() fails when some fields of rhashtable_params
>      struct are not initialized properly.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v2] xdp: remove WARN() from __xdp_reg_mem_model()
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/de081f82e810

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/core/xdp.c b/net/core/xdp.c
index 41693154e426..022c12059cf2 100644
--- a/net/core/xdp.c
+++ b/net/core/xdp.c
@@ -295,10 +295,8 @@  static struct xdp_mem_allocator *__xdp_reg_mem_model(struct xdp_mem_info *mem,
 		mutex_lock(&mem_id_lock);
 		ret = __mem_id_init_hash_table();
 		mutex_unlock(&mem_id_lock);
-		if (ret < 0) {
-			WARN_ON(1);
+		if (ret < 0)
 			return ERR_PTR(ret);
-		}
 	}
 
 	xdp_alloc = kzalloc(sizeof(*xdp_alloc), gfp);