diff mbox series

[bpf,v4,1/2] bpf: Fix null pointer dereference in resolve_prog_type() for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT

Message ID 20240711145819.254178-2-wutengda@huaweicloud.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit f7866c35873377313ff94398f17d425b28b71de1
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: Fix null-pointer-deref in resolve_prog_type() | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-PR success PR summary
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag present in non-next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit fail Errors and warnings before: 47 this patch: 47
netdev/build_tools success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 13 of 13 maintainers
netdev/build_clang fail Errors and warnings before: 36 this patch: 36
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn fail Errors and warnings before: 110 this patch: 110
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 8 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-18 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc

Commit Message

Tengda Wu July 11, 2024, 2:58 p.m. UTC 
When loading a EXT program without specifying `attr->attach_prog_fd`,
the `prog->aux->dst_prog` will be null. At this time, calling
resolve_prog_type() anywhere will result in a null pointer dereference.

Example stack trace:

[    8.107863] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000004
[    8.108262] Mem abort info:
[    8.108384]   ESR = 0x0000000096000004
[    8.108547]   EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
[    8.108722]   SET = 0, FnV = 0
[    8.108827]   EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
[    8.108939]   FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault
[    8.109102] Data abort info:
[    8.109203]   ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000
[    8.109399]   CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0
[    8.109614]   GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0
[    8.109836] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000101354000
[    8.110011] [0000000000000004] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000
[    8.112624] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    8.112783] Modules linked in:
[    8.113120] CPU: 0 PID: 99 Comm: may_access_dire Not tainted 6.10.0-rc3-next-20240613-dirty #1
[    8.113230] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    8.113390] pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    8.113429] pc : may_access_direct_pkt_data+0x24/0xa0
[    8.113746] lr : add_subprog_and_kfunc+0x634/0x8e8
[    8.113798] sp : ffff80008283b9f0
[    8.113813] x29: ffff80008283b9f0 x28: ffff800082795048 x27: 0000000000000001
[    8.113881] x26: ffff0000c0bb2600 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000
[    8.113897] x23: ffff0000c1134000 x22: 000000000001864f x21: ffff0000c1138000
[    8.113912] x20: 0000000000000001 x19: ffff0000c12b8000 x18: ffffffffffffffff
[    8.113929] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0720072007200720
[    8.113944] x14: 0720072007200720 x13: 0720072007200720 x12: 0720072007200720
[    8.113958] x11: 0720072007200720 x10: 0000000000f9fca4 x9 : ffff80008021f4e4
[    8.113991] x8 : 0101010101010101 x7 : 746f72705f6d656d x6 : 000000001e0e0f5f
[    8.114006] x5 : 000000000001864f x4 : ffff0000c12b8000 x3 : 000000000000001c
[    8.114020] x2 : 0000000000000002 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000
[    8.114126] Call trace:
[    8.114159]  may_access_direct_pkt_data+0x24/0xa0
[    8.114202]  bpf_check+0x3bc/0x28c0
[    8.114214]  bpf_prog_load+0x658/0xa58
[    8.114227]  __sys_bpf+0xc50/0x2250
[    8.114240]  __arm64_sys_bpf+0x28/0x40
[    8.114254]  invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x54/0xf0
[    8.114273]  do_el0_svc+0x4c/0xd8
[    8.114289]  el0_svc+0x3c/0x140
[    8.114305]  el0t_64_sync_handler+0x134/0x150
[    8.114331]  el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x170
[    8.114477] Code: 7100707f 54000081 f9401c00 f9403800 (b9400403)
[    8.118672] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

One way to fix it is by forcing `attach_prog_fd` non-empty when
bpf_prog_load(). But this will lead to `libbpf_probe_bpf_prog_type`
API broken which use verifier log to probe prog type and will log
nothing if we reject invalid EXT prog before bpf_check().

Another way is by adding null check in resolve_prog_type().

The issue was introduced by commit 4a9c7bbe2ed4 ("bpf: Resolve to
prog->aux->dst_prog->type only for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT") which wanted
to correct type resolution for BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING programs. Before
that, the type resolution of BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT prog actually follows
the logic below:

  prog->aux->dst_prog ? prog->aux->dst_prog->type : prog->type;

It implies that when EXT program is not yet attached to `dst_prog`,
the prog type should be EXT itself. This code worked fine in the past.
So just keep using it.

Fix this by returning `prog->type` for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT if `dst_prog`
is not present in resolve_prog_type().

Fixes: 4a9c7bbe2ed4 ("bpf: Resolve to prog->aux->dst_prog->type only for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.18+
Signed-off-by: Tengda Wu <wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
---
 include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Leon Hwang July 23, 2024, 2:13 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 2024/7/11 22:58, Tengda Wu wrote:
> When loading a EXT program without specifying `attr->attach_prog_fd`,
> the `prog->aux->dst_prog` will be null. At this time, calling
> resolve_prog_type() anywhere will result in a null pointer dereference.
> 
> Example stack trace:
> 
> [    8.107863] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000004
> [    8.108262] Mem abort info:
> [    8.108384]   ESR = 0x0000000096000004
> [    8.108547]   EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
> [    8.108722]   SET = 0, FnV = 0
> [    8.108827]   EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
> [    8.108939]   FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault
> [    8.109102] Data abort info:
> [    8.109203]   ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000
> [    8.109399]   CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0
> [    8.109614]   GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0
> [    8.109836] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000101354000
> [    8.110011] [0000000000000004] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000
> [    8.112624] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> [    8.112783] Modules linked in:
> [    8.113120] CPU: 0 PID: 99 Comm: may_access_dire Not tainted 6.10.0-rc3-next-20240613-dirty #1
> [    8.113230] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> [    8.113390] pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> [    8.113429] pc : may_access_direct_pkt_data+0x24/0xa0
> [    8.113746] lr : add_subprog_and_kfunc+0x634/0x8e8
> [    8.113798] sp : ffff80008283b9f0
> [    8.113813] x29: ffff80008283b9f0 x28: ffff800082795048 x27: 0000000000000001
> [    8.113881] x26: ffff0000c0bb2600 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000
> [    8.113897] x23: ffff0000c1134000 x22: 000000000001864f x21: ffff0000c1138000
> [    8.113912] x20: 0000000000000001 x19: ffff0000c12b8000 x18: ffffffffffffffff
> [    8.113929] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0720072007200720
> [    8.113944] x14: 0720072007200720 x13: 0720072007200720 x12: 0720072007200720
> [    8.113958] x11: 0720072007200720 x10: 0000000000f9fca4 x9 : ffff80008021f4e4
> [    8.113991] x8 : 0101010101010101 x7 : 746f72705f6d656d x6 : 000000001e0e0f5f
> [    8.114006] x5 : 000000000001864f x4 : ffff0000c12b8000 x3 : 000000000000001c
> [    8.114020] x2 : 0000000000000002 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000
> [    8.114126] Call trace:
> [    8.114159]  may_access_direct_pkt_data+0x24/0xa0
> [    8.114202]  bpf_check+0x3bc/0x28c0
> [    8.114214]  bpf_prog_load+0x658/0xa58
> [    8.114227]  __sys_bpf+0xc50/0x2250
> [    8.114240]  __arm64_sys_bpf+0x28/0x40
> [    8.114254]  invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x54/0xf0
> [    8.114273]  do_el0_svc+0x4c/0xd8
> [    8.114289]  el0_svc+0x3c/0x140
> [    8.114305]  el0t_64_sync_handler+0x134/0x150
> [    8.114331]  el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x170
> [    8.114477] Code: 7100707f 54000081 f9401c00 f9403800 (b9400403)
> [    8.118672] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> 
> One way to fix it is by forcing `attach_prog_fd` non-empty when
> bpf_prog_load(). But this will lead to `libbpf_probe_bpf_prog_type`
> API broken which use verifier log to probe prog type and will log
> nothing if we reject invalid EXT prog before bpf_check().
> 
> Another way is by adding null check in resolve_prog_type().
> 
> The issue was introduced by commit 4a9c7bbe2ed4 ("bpf: Resolve to
> prog->aux->dst_prog->type only for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT") which wanted
> to correct type resolution for BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING programs. Before
> that, the type resolution of BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT prog actually follows
> the logic below:
> 
>   prog->aux->dst_prog ? prog->aux->dst_prog->type : prog->type;
> 
> It implies that when EXT program is not yet attached to `dst_prog`,
> the prog type should be EXT itself. This code worked fine in the past.
> So just keep using it.
> 
> Fix this by returning `prog->type` for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT if `dst_prog`
> is not present in resolve_prog_type().
> 
> Fixes: 4a9c7bbe2ed4 ("bpf: Resolve to prog->aux->dst_prog->type only for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.18+
> Signed-off-by: Tengda Wu <wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
> index e4070fb02b11..ff2a6cdb1fa3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
> @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ static inline u32 type_flag(u32 type)
>  /* only use after check_attach_btf_id() */
>  static inline enum bpf_prog_type resolve_prog_type(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
>  {
> -	return prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT ?
> +	return (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT && prog->aux->dst_prog) ?
>  		prog->aux->dst_prog->type : prog->type;
>  }
>  

It seems not good enough here.

When I want to update an attached freplace prog to PROG_ARRAY map, it
will fail, like this selftest[0]. In this selftest, there is a
PROG_ARRAY map in freplace prog. And when loading with freplace's target
BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS prog, PROG_ARRAY map owner type is set as
BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS. Next, after attaching freplace prog, when I
want to update the freplace prog, it will fail because
resolve_prog_type() returns BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT (because freplace
prog->aux->dst_prog is NULL after attaching).

When to run the selftest:

./test_progs -v -t tailcalls/tailcall_freplace
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:open fr_skel 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:open tc_skel 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:tc_skel entry prog_id 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:set_attach_target 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:load fr_skel 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:attatch_freplace 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:fr_skel entry prog_fd 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:fr_skel jmp_table map_fd 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:FAIL:update jmp_table unexpected error: -22
(errno 22)
#327/25  tailcalls/tailcall_freplace:FAIL

It is better to fix by my way[1], which passes all selftests[2].

When to run the selftest with my way:

./test_progs -v -t tailcalls/tailcall_freplace
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:open fr_skel 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:open tc_skel 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:tc_skel entry prog_id 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:set_attach_target 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:load fr_skel 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:attatch_freplace 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:fr_skel entry prog_fd 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:fr_skel jmp_table map_fd 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:update jmp_table 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:prog_fd 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:test_run 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:test_run retval 0 nsec
#327/25  tailcalls/tailcall_freplace:OK

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240602122421.50892-3-hffilwlqm@gmail.com/
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240602122421.50892-2-hffilwlqm@gmail.com/
[2] https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/pull/7432/checks

Thanks,
Leon
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index e4070fb02b11..ff2a6cdb1fa3 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@  static inline u32 type_flag(u32 type)
 /* only use after check_attach_btf_id() */
 static inline enum bpf_prog_type resolve_prog_type(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
 {
-	return prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT ?
+	return (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT && prog->aux->dst_prog) ?
 		prog->aux->dst_prog->type : prog->type;
 }