Message ID | 20240728002602.3198398-6-ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | RFC |
Headers | show |
Series | Support TCP listen access-control | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
netdev/tree_selection | success | Not a local patch, async |
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 08:25:58AM +0800, Mikhail Ivanov wrote: > Test checks that listen(2) doesn't wrongfully return -EACCES instead > of -EINVAL when trying to listen for an incorrect socket state. > > Signed-off-by: Mikhail Ivanov <ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com> Good to have this test! > --- > tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c > index b6fe9bde205f..a8385f1373f6 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c > @@ -1644,6 +1644,71 @@ TEST_F(ipv4_tcp, with_fs) > EXPECT_EQ(-EACCES, bind_variant(bind_fd, &self->srv1)); > } > > +TEST_F(ipv4_tcp, listen_on_connected) We should use the "protocol" fixture and its variants instead to test with different protocols and also without sandboxing (which is crutial). I guess espintcp_listen should use "protocol" too. ipv4_tcp is to run tests that only make sense on an IPv4 socket, but when we test EINVAL, we should make sure Landlock doesn't introduce inconsistencies for other/unsupported protocols. > +{ > + const struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = { > + .handled_access_net = ACCESS_ALL, > + }; > + const struct landlock_net_port_attr tcp_not_restricted_p0 = { > + .allowed_access = ACCESS_ALL, > + .port = self->srv0.port, > + }; > + const struct landlock_net_port_attr tcp_denied_listen_p1 = { > + .allowed_access = ACCESS_ALL & ~LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_LISTEN_TCP, > + .port = self->srv1.port, > + }; > + int ruleset_fd; > + int bind_fd, status; > + pid_t child; > + > + ruleset_fd = > + landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0); > + ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd); > + > + /* Allows all actions for the first port. */ > + ASSERT_EQ(0, landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT, > + &tcp_not_restricted_p0, 0)); > + > + /* Deny listen for the second port. */ nit: Denies listening > + ASSERT_EQ(0, landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT, > + &tcp_denied_listen_p1, 0)); > + > + enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd); > + EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd)); > + > + /* Init listening socket. */ nit: Initializes > + bind_fd = socket_variant(&self->srv0); > + ASSERT_LE(0, bind_fd); > + EXPECT_EQ(0, bind_variant(bind_fd, &self->srv0)); > + EXPECT_EQ(0, listen_variant(bind_fd, backlog)); > + > + child = fork(); > + ASSERT_LE(0, child); > + if (child == 0) { > + int connect_fd; > + > + /* Closes listening socket for the child. */ > + EXPECT_EQ(0, close(bind_fd)); > + > + connect_fd = socket_variant(&self->srv1); > + ASSERT_LE(0, connect_fd); > + EXPECT_EQ(0, connect_variant(connect_fd, &self->srv0)); > + > + /* Tries to listen on connected socket. */ > + EXPECT_EQ(-EINVAL, listen_variant(connect_fd, backlog)); > + > + EXPECT_EQ(0, close(connect_fd)); > + _exit(_metadata->exit_code); > + return; > + } > + > + EXPECT_EQ(child, waitpid(child, &status, 0)); > + EXPECT_EQ(1, WIFEXITED(status)); > + EXPECT_EQ(EXIT_SUCCESS, WEXITSTATUS(status)); > + > + EXPECT_EQ(0, close(bind_fd)); > +} > + > FIXTURE(port_specific) > { > struct service_fixture srv0; > -- > 2.34.1 > >
8/1/2024 5:46 PM, Mickaël Salaün wrote: > On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 08:25:58AM +0800, Mikhail Ivanov wrote: >> Test checks that listen(2) doesn't wrongfully return -EACCES instead >> of -EINVAL when trying to listen for an incorrect socket state. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Ivanov <ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com> > > Good to have this test! > >> --- >> tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c >> index b6fe9bde205f..a8385f1373f6 100644 >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c >> @@ -1644,6 +1644,71 @@ TEST_F(ipv4_tcp, with_fs) >> EXPECT_EQ(-EACCES, bind_variant(bind_fd, &self->srv1)); >> } >> >> +TEST_F(ipv4_tcp, listen_on_connected) > > We should use the "protocol" fixture and its variants instead to test > with different protocols and also without sandboxing (which is crutial). > > I guess espintcp_listen should use "protocol" too. > > ipv4_tcp is to run tests that only make sense on an IPv4 socket, but > when we test EINVAL, we should make sure Landlock doesn't introduce > inconsistencies for other/unsupported protocols. Makes sense, let's use "protocol". > >> +{ >> + const struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = { >> + .handled_access_net = ACCESS_ALL, >> + }; >> + const struct landlock_net_port_attr tcp_not_restricted_p0 = { >> + .allowed_access = ACCESS_ALL, >> + .port = self->srv0.port, >> + }; >> + const struct landlock_net_port_attr tcp_denied_listen_p1 = { >> + .allowed_access = ACCESS_ALL & ~LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_LISTEN_TCP, >> + .port = self->srv1.port, >> + }; >> + int ruleset_fd; >> + int bind_fd, status; >> + pid_t child; >> + >> + ruleset_fd = >> + landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0); >> + ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd); >> + >> + /* Allows all actions for the first port. */ >> + ASSERT_EQ(0, landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT, >> + &tcp_not_restricted_p0, 0)); >> + >> + /* Deny listen for the second port. */ > > nit: Denies listening will be fixed > >> + ASSERT_EQ(0, landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT, >> + &tcp_denied_listen_p1, 0)); >> + >> + enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd); >> + EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd)); >> + >> + /* Init listening socket. */ > > nit: Initializes will be fixed > >> + bind_fd = socket_variant(&self->srv0); >> + ASSERT_LE(0, bind_fd); >> + EXPECT_EQ(0, bind_variant(bind_fd, &self->srv0)); >> + EXPECT_EQ(0, listen_variant(bind_fd, backlog)); >> + >> + child = fork(); >> + ASSERT_LE(0, child); >> + if (child == 0) { >> + int connect_fd; >> + >> + /* Closes listening socket for the child. */ >> + EXPECT_EQ(0, close(bind_fd)); >> + >> + connect_fd = socket_variant(&self->srv1); >> + ASSERT_LE(0, connect_fd); >> + EXPECT_EQ(0, connect_variant(connect_fd, &self->srv0)); >> + >> + /* Tries to listen on connected socket. */ >> + EXPECT_EQ(-EINVAL, listen_variant(connect_fd, backlog)); >> + >> + EXPECT_EQ(0, close(connect_fd)); >> + _exit(_metadata->exit_code); >> + return; >> + } >> + >> + EXPECT_EQ(child, waitpid(child, &status, 0)); >> + EXPECT_EQ(1, WIFEXITED(status)); >> + EXPECT_EQ(EXIT_SUCCESS, WEXITSTATUS(status)); >> + >> + EXPECT_EQ(0, close(bind_fd)); >> +} >> + >> FIXTURE(port_specific) >> { >> struct service_fixture srv0; >> -- >> 2.34.1 >> >>
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c index b6fe9bde205f..a8385f1373f6 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c @@ -1644,6 +1644,71 @@ TEST_F(ipv4_tcp, with_fs) EXPECT_EQ(-EACCES, bind_variant(bind_fd, &self->srv1)); } +TEST_F(ipv4_tcp, listen_on_connected) +{ + const struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = { + .handled_access_net = ACCESS_ALL, + }; + const struct landlock_net_port_attr tcp_not_restricted_p0 = { + .allowed_access = ACCESS_ALL, + .port = self->srv0.port, + }; + const struct landlock_net_port_attr tcp_denied_listen_p1 = { + .allowed_access = ACCESS_ALL & ~LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_LISTEN_TCP, + .port = self->srv1.port, + }; + int ruleset_fd; + int bind_fd, status; + pid_t child; + + ruleset_fd = + landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0); + ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd); + + /* Allows all actions for the first port. */ + ASSERT_EQ(0, landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT, + &tcp_not_restricted_p0, 0)); + + /* Deny listen for the second port. */ + ASSERT_EQ(0, landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT, + &tcp_denied_listen_p1, 0)); + + enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd); + EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd)); + + /* Init listening socket. */ + bind_fd = socket_variant(&self->srv0); + ASSERT_LE(0, bind_fd); + EXPECT_EQ(0, bind_variant(bind_fd, &self->srv0)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, listen_variant(bind_fd, backlog)); + + child = fork(); + ASSERT_LE(0, child); + if (child == 0) { + int connect_fd; + + /* Closes listening socket for the child. */ + EXPECT_EQ(0, close(bind_fd)); + + connect_fd = socket_variant(&self->srv1); + ASSERT_LE(0, connect_fd); + EXPECT_EQ(0, connect_variant(connect_fd, &self->srv0)); + + /* Tries to listen on connected socket. */ + EXPECT_EQ(-EINVAL, listen_variant(connect_fd, backlog)); + + EXPECT_EQ(0, close(connect_fd)); + _exit(_metadata->exit_code); + return; + } + + EXPECT_EQ(child, waitpid(child, &status, 0)); + EXPECT_EQ(1, WIFEXITED(status)); + EXPECT_EQ(EXIT_SUCCESS, WEXITSTATUS(status)); + + EXPECT_EQ(0, close(bind_fd)); +} + FIXTURE(port_specific) { struct service_fixture srv0;
Test checks that listen(2) doesn't wrongfully return -EACCES instead of -EINVAL when trying to listen for an incorrect socket state. Signed-off-by: Mikhail Ivanov <ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)