Message ID | 20240818114351.3612692-1-gal@nvidia.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 13cfd6a6d7ac78e845768278ab745acbd19c43ce |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | [net-next] net: Silence false field-spanning write warning in metadata_dst memcpy | expand |
On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 14:43:51 +0300 Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com> wrote: > When metadata_dst struct is allocated (using metadata_dst_alloc()), it > reserves room for options at the end of the struct. > > Change the memcpy() to unsafe_memcpy() as it is guaranteed that enough > room (md_size bytes) was allocated and the field-spanning write is > intentional. > > This resolves the following warning: > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 104) of single field "&new_md->u.tun_info" at include/net/dst_metadata.h:166 (size 96) > WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 391470 at include/net/dst_metadata.h:166 tun_dst_unclone+0x114/0x138 [geneve] > Modules linked in: act_tunnel_key geneve ip6_udp_tunnel udp_tunnel act_vlan act_mirred act_skbedit cls_matchall nfnetlink_cttimeout act_gact cls_flower sch_ingress sbsa_gwdt ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler xfrm_interface xfrm6_tunnel tunnel6 tunnel4 xfrm_user xfrm_algo nvme_fabrics overlay optee openvswitch nsh nf_conncount ib_srp scsi_transport_srp rpcrdma rdma_ucm ib_iser rdma_cm ib_umad iw_cm libiscsi ib_ipoib scsi_transport_iscsi ib_cm uio_pdrv_genirq uio mlxbf_pmc pwr_mlxbf mlxbf_bootctl bluefield_edac nft_chain_nat binfmt_misc xt_MASQUERADE nf_nat xt_tcpmss xt_NFLOG nfnetlink_log xt_recent xt_hashlimit xt_state xt_conntrack nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 xt_mark xt_comment ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 nft_compat nf_tables nfnetlink sch_fq_codel dm_multipath fuse efi_pstore ip_tables btrfs blake2b_generic raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx xor xor_neon raid6_pq raid1 raid0 nvme nvme_core mlx5_ib ib_uverbs ib_core ipv6 crc_ccitt mlx5_core crct10dif_ce mlxfw > psample i2c_mlxbf gpio_mlxbf2 mlxbf_gige mlxbf_tmfifo > CPU: 2 PID: 391470 Comm: handler6 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc1 #1 > Hardware name: https://www.mellanox.com BlueField SoC/BlueField SoC, BIOS 4.5.0.12993 Dec 6 2023 > pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) > pc : tun_dst_unclone+0x114/0x138 [geneve] > lr : tun_dst_unclone+0x114/0x138 [geneve] > sp : ffffffc0804533f0 > x29: ffffffc0804533f0 x28: 000000000000024e x27: 0000000000000000 > x26: ffffffdcfc0e8e40 x25: ffffff8086fa6600 x24: ffffff8096a0c000 > x23: 0000000000000068 x22: 0000000000000008 x21: ffffff8092ad7000 > x20: ffffff8081e17900 x19: ffffff8092ad7900 x18: 00000000fffffffd > x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffffffdcfa018488 x15: 695f6e75742e753e > x14: 2d646d5f77656e26 x13: 6d5f77656e262220 x12: 646c65696620656c > x11: ffffffdcfbe33ae8 x10: ffffffdcfbe1baa8 x9 : ffffffdcfa0a4c10 > x8 : 0000000000017fe8 x7 : c0000000ffffefff x6 : 0000000000000001 > x5 : ffffff83fdeeb010 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000027 > x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffffff80913f6780 > Call trace: > tun_dst_unclone+0x114/0x138 [geneve] > geneve_xmit+0x214/0x10e0 [geneve] > dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc0/0x220 > __dev_queue_xmit+0xa14/0xd38 > dev_queue_xmit+0x14/0x28 [openvswitch] > ovs_vport_send+0x98/0x1c8 [openvswitch] > do_output+0x80/0x1a0 [openvswitch] > do_execute_actions+0x172c/0x1958 [openvswitch] > ovs_execute_actions+0x64/0x1a8 [openvswitch] > ovs_packet_cmd_execute+0x258/0x2d8 [openvswitch] > genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xc8/0x138 > genl_rcv_msg+0x1ec/0x280 > netlink_rcv_skb+0x64/0x150 > genl_rcv+0x40/0x60 > netlink_unicast+0x2e4/0x348 > netlink_sendmsg+0x1b0/0x400 > __sock_sendmsg+0x64/0xc0 > ____sys_sendmsg+0x284/0x308 > ___sys_sendmsg+0x88/0xf0 > __sys_sendmsg+0x70/0xd8 > __arm64_sys_sendmsg+0x2c/0x40 > invoke_syscall+0x50/0x128 > el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x48/0xf0 > do_el0_svc+0x24/0x38 > el0_svc+0x38/0x100 > el0t_64_sync_handler+0xc0/0xc8 > el0t_64_sync+0x1a4/0x1a8 > ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- > > Reviewed-by: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com> > Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com> > Signed-off-by: Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com> > --- > include/net/dst_metadata.h | 7 +++++-- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/net/dst_metadata.h b/include/net/dst_metadata.h > index 4160731dcb6e..84c15402931c 100644 > --- a/include/net/dst_metadata.h > +++ b/include/net/dst_metadata.h > @@ -163,8 +163,11 @@ static inline struct metadata_dst *tun_dst_unclone(struct sk_buff *skb) > if (!new_md) > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > > - memcpy(&new_md->u.tun_info, &md_dst->u.tun_info, > - sizeof(struct ip_tunnel_info) + md_size); > + unsafe_memcpy(&new_md->u.tun_info, &md_dst->u.tun_info, > + sizeof(struct ip_tunnel_info) + md_size, > + /* metadata_dst_alloc() reserves room (md_size bytes) for > + * options right after the ip_tunnel_info struct. > + */); This is an awkward /* midsentence */ place to put a comment.
On 18/08/2024 18:09, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 14:43:51 +0300 > Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com> wrote: >> diff --git a/include/net/dst_metadata.h b/include/net/dst_metadata.h >> index 4160731dcb6e..84c15402931c 100644 >> --- a/include/net/dst_metadata.h >> +++ b/include/net/dst_metadata.h >> @@ -163,8 +163,11 @@ static inline struct metadata_dst *tun_dst_unclone(struct sk_buff *skb) >> if (!new_md) >> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); >> >> - memcpy(&new_md->u.tun_info, &md_dst->u.tun_info, >> - sizeof(struct ip_tunnel_info) + md_size); >> + unsafe_memcpy(&new_md->u.tun_info, &md_dst->u.tun_info, >> + sizeof(struct ip_tunnel_info) + md_size, >> + /* metadata_dst_alloc() reserves room (md_size bytes) for >> + * options right after the ip_tunnel_info struct. >> + */); > > This is an awkward /* midsentence */ place to put a comment. I do not disagree, but it is quite common for unsafe_memcpy() callers.
Hello: This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main) by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>: On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 14:43:51 +0300 you wrote: > When metadata_dst struct is allocated (using metadata_dst_alloc()), it > reserves room for options at the end of the struct. > > Change the memcpy() to unsafe_memcpy() as it is guaranteed that enough > room (md_size bytes) was allocated and the field-spanning write is > intentional. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [net-next] net: Silence false field-spanning write warning in metadata_dst memcpy https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/13cfd6a6d7ac You are awesome, thank you!
diff --git a/include/net/dst_metadata.h b/include/net/dst_metadata.h index 4160731dcb6e..84c15402931c 100644 --- a/include/net/dst_metadata.h +++ b/include/net/dst_metadata.h @@ -163,8 +163,11 @@ static inline struct metadata_dst *tun_dst_unclone(struct sk_buff *skb) if (!new_md) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); - memcpy(&new_md->u.tun_info, &md_dst->u.tun_info, - sizeof(struct ip_tunnel_info) + md_size); + unsafe_memcpy(&new_md->u.tun_info, &md_dst->u.tun_info, + sizeof(struct ip_tunnel_info) + md_size, + /* metadata_dst_alloc() reserves room (md_size bytes) for + * options right after the ip_tunnel_info struct. + */); #ifdef CONFIG_DST_CACHE /* Unclone the dst cache if there is one */ if (new_md->u.tun_info.dst_cache.cache) {