Context |
Check |
Description |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR |
success
|
PR summary
|
netdev/series_format |
success
|
Posting correctly formatted
|
netdev/tree_selection |
success
|
Clearly marked for bpf-next
|
netdev/ynl |
success
|
Generated files up to date;
no warnings/errors;
no diff in generated;
|
netdev/fixes_present |
success
|
Fixes tag not required for -next series
|
netdev/header_inline |
success
|
No static functions without inline keyword in header files
|
netdev/build_32bit |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 42 this patch: 42
|
netdev/build_tools |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
|
netdev/cc_maintainers |
warning
|
9 maintainers not CCed: sdf@fomichev.me mykolal@fb.com haoluo@google.com jolsa@kernel.org shuah@kernel.org linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org song@kernel.org kpsingh@kernel.org john.fastabend@gmail.com
|
netdev/build_clang |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 44 this patch: 44
|
netdev/verify_signedoff |
success
|
Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
|
netdev/deprecated_api |
success
|
None detected
|
netdev/check_selftest |
success
|
No net selftest shell script
|
netdev/verify_fixes |
success
|
No Fixes tag
|
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 49 this patch: 49
|
netdev/checkpatch |
warning
|
WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
WARNING: line length of 82 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 85 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 86 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 88 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 96 exceeds 80 columns
|
netdev/build_clang_rust |
success
|
No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
|
netdev/kdoc |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
|
netdev/source_inline |
success
|
Was 0 now: 0
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 |
success
|
Logs for ShellCheck
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 |
success
|
Logs for Lint
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 |
success
|
Logs for Unittests
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 |
success
|
Logs for Validate matrix.py
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 |
success
|
Logs for set-matrix
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+/* Test cases that can't load programs using libbpf and need direct
+ * BPF syscall access
+ */
+
+#include <sys/syscall.h>
+#include <bpf/libbpf.h>
+#include <bpf/btf.h>
+
+#include "test_progs.h"
+#include "test_btf.h"
+#include "bpf/libbpf_internal.h"
+
+static char log[16 * 1024];
+
+/* Check that verifier rejects BPF program containing relocation
+ * pointing to non-existent BTF type.
+ */
+static void test_bad_local_id(void)
+{
+ struct test_btf {
+ struct btf_header hdr;
+ __u32 types[15];
+ char strings[128];
+ } raw_btf = {
+ .hdr = {
+ .magic = BTF_MAGIC,
+ .version = BTF_VERSION,
+ .hdr_len = sizeof(struct btf_header),
+ .type_off = 0,
+ .type_len = sizeof(raw_btf.types),
+ .str_off = offsetof(struct test_btf, strings) -
+ offsetof(struct test_btf, types),
+ .str_len = sizeof(raw_btf.strings),
+ },
+ .types = {
+ BTF_PTR_ENC(0), /* [1] void* */
+ BTF_TYPE_INT_ENC(1, BTF_INT_SIGNED, 0, 32, 4), /* [2] int */
+ BTF_FUNC_PROTO_ENC(2, 1), /* [3] int (*)(void*) */
+ BTF_FUNC_PROTO_ARG_ENC(8, 1),
+ BTF_FUNC_ENC(8, 3) /* [4] FUNC 'foo' type_id=2 */
+ },
+ .strings = "\0int\0 0\0foo\0"
+ };
+ __u32 log_level = 1 | 2 | 4;
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_btf_load_opts, opts,
+ .log_buf = log,
+ .log_size = sizeof(log),
+ .log_level = log_level,
+ );
+ struct bpf_insn insns[] = {
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ };
+ struct bpf_func_info funcs[] = {
+ {
+ .insn_off = 0,
+ .type_id = 4,
+ }
+ };
+ struct bpf_core_relo relos[] = {
+ {
+ .insn_off = 0, /* patch first instruction (r0 = 0) */
+ .type_id = 100500, /* !!! this type id does not exist */
+ .access_str_off = 6, /* offset of "0" */
+ .kind = BPF_CORE_TYPE_ID_LOCAL,
+ }
+ };
+ union bpf_attr attr;
+ int saved_errno;
+ int prog_fd = -1;
+ int btf_fd = -1;
+
+ btf_fd = bpf_btf_load(&raw_btf, sizeof(raw_btf), &opts);
+ saved_errno = errno;
+ if (btf_fd < 0 || env.verbosity > VERBOSE_NORMAL) {
+ printf("-------- BTF load log start --------\n");
+ printf("%s", log);
+ printf("-------- BTF load log end ----------\n");
+ }
+ if (btf_fd < 0) {
+ PRINT_FAIL("bpf_btf_load() failed, errno=%d\n", saved_errno);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ log[0] = 0;
+ memset(&attr, 0, sizeof(attr));
+ attr.prog_btf_fd = btf_fd;
+ attr.prog_type = BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP;
+ attr.license = (__u64)"GPL";
+ attr.insns = (__u64)&insns;
+ attr.insn_cnt = sizeof(insns) / sizeof(*insns);
+ attr.log_buf = (__u64)log;
+ attr.log_size = sizeof(log);
+ attr.log_level = log_level;
+ attr.func_info = (__u64)funcs;
+ attr.func_info_cnt = sizeof(funcs) / sizeof(*funcs);
+ attr.func_info_rec_size = sizeof(*funcs);
+ attr.core_relos = (__u64)relos;
+ attr.core_relo_cnt = sizeof(relos) / sizeof(*relos);
+ attr.core_relo_rec_size = sizeof(*relos);
+ prog_fd = sys_bpf_prog_load(&attr, sizeof(attr), 1);
+ saved_errno = errno;
+ if (prog_fd < 0 || env.verbosity > VERBOSE_NORMAL) {
+ printf("-------- program load log start --------\n");
+ printf("%s", log);
+ printf("-------- program load log end ----------\n");
+ }
+ if (prog_fd >= 0) {
+ PRINT_FAIL("sys_bpf_prog_load() expected to fail\n");
+ goto out;
+ }
+ ASSERT_HAS_SUBSTR(log, "relo #0: bad type id 100500", "program load log");
+
+out:
+ close(prog_fd);
+ close(btf_fd);
+}
+
+void test_core_reloc_raw(void)
+{
+ if (test__start_subtest("bad_local_id"))
+ test_bad_local_id();
+}
Check that verifier rejects BPF program containing relocation pointing to non-existent BTF type. To force relocation resolution on kernel side test case uses bpf_attr->core_relos field. This field is not exposed by libbpf, so directly do BPF system call in the test. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> --- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc_raw.c | 125 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 125 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc_raw.c