From patchwork Wed Oct 16 18:35:22 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?q?Alexis_Lothor=C3=A9_=28eBPF_Foundation=29?= X-Patchwork-Id: 13838718 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (relay6-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75B2320E03C; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 18:35:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.198 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729103750; cv=none; b=pNEkLhVmarR7KFJ7WORUiCS/OJvHUgI2ILYVQhjYMCFoTeLiapuAyL24kgqE6ht1Ak4fjm7P7EjBs0Fa0GiJUXZ0SyTISc1ewlXrNebz7l7gjSGomVIvCBkAeP78DXGTY4YH45RerVJKOSD+V9a0oEEk85XxOwC6ckmJM/BQYdM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729103750; c=relaxed/simple; bh=j7qN9vq9sPaOCJU1BcGnOHODVCTLCmtSVJ7k4WEjkMA=; h=From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=E9OMA+l+ik2CtzjZ0jSSQkjAjlEscBqr8JBh8leGXtzmhUSIZJqRo1sVYCATvNgq7QxTpntaqhKLZOf9S4rBkUnEy9v6F9Ku4Hk4JOe+vlTj4N7vBGKN0mnHR2PDKwp8OEVFR0zH0K/uW8qbqqdbWIu6g2GqdfHI7soWzMgcNXY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=AGvM+fgV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.198 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="AGvM+fgV" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90C43C0002; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 18:35:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1729103745; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=j3bKzWn3vPUHMtD6lTaI/aOCLqvJ5cI7TPdh7bpW0oM=; b=AGvM+fgVqauSwQpK4ICn6HQgo1Cx9oiHQ9ZEJH8Si/f5yY8V77OvYNNSFKajfj6v+XxcLH Bjo3okbEjfWYTUguMW6c3VkQqD1Gy1P/1Vdmp8Kh38dh5/lg9+hkgi1yvlAuuABnnNK3hq lT4EkFQ1mAGj9YMm+gGJwdBSDOCYmtKAexz11C/WZTZdcyGgzGfU7RO+zZ0CblbbvD2phl VFoKm2iv/dKgV0KLA8BysntADZkdtbAVgWzW08zcfWbFUIyYPhRWW+MFGJQSDEzZzlCoPd i6AG+XYppWkde8h0m0QahShr9ak/39scVL5E9RcUvfUwLdi+aRIkf0C+TSvHKQ== From: =?utf-8?q?Alexis_Lothor=C3=A9_=28eBPF_Foundation=29?= Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 20:35:22 +0200 Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 1/6] selftests/bpf: factorize conn and syncookies tests in a single runner Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20241016-syncookie-v1-1-3b7a0de12153@bootlin.com> References: <20241016-syncookie-v1-0-3b7a0de12153@bootlin.com> In-Reply-To: <20241016-syncookie-v1-0-3b7a0de12153@bootlin.com> To: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Eduard Zingerman , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , Mykola Lysenko , Shuah Khan , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Jesper Dangaard Brouer Cc: ebpf@linuxfoundation.org, Thomas Petazzoni , Lorenz Bauer , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?q?Alexis_Lothor=C3=A9_=28eBPF_Foundation?= =?utf-8?q?=29?= X-Mailer: b4 0.14.2 X-GND-Sasl: alexis.lothore@bootlin.com X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net btf_skc_cls_ingress currently describe two tests, both running a simple tcp server and then initializing a connection to it. The sole difference between the tests is about the tcp_syncookie configuration, and some checks around this feature being enabled/disabled. Share the common code between those two tests by moving the code into a single runner, parameterized by a "gen_cookies" argument. Split the performed checks accordingly. Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) --- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_skc_cls_ingress.c | 106 +++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_skc_cls_ingress.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_skc_cls_ingress.c index ef4d6a3ae4231b250f43f8f93eeca6499abeaadc..5d8d7736edc095b647ca3fbc12cac0440b60140e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_skc_cls_ingress.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_skc_cls_ingress.c @@ -71,13 +71,14 @@ static void print_err_line(void) printf("bpf prog error at line %u\n", skel->bss->linum); } -static void test_conn(void) +static void run_test(bool gen_cookies) { + const char *tcp_syncookies = gen_cookies ? "2" : "1"; int listen_fd = -1, cli_fd = -1, srv_fd = -1, err; socklen_t addrlen = sizeof(srv_sa6); int srv_port; - if (write_sysctl("/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syncookies", "1")) + if (write_sysctl("/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syncookies", tcp_syncookies)) return; listen_fd = start_server(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, "::1", 0, 0); @@ -99,19 +100,36 @@ static void test_conn(void) if (CHECK_FAIL(srv_fd == -1)) goto done; - if (CHECK(skel->bss->listen_tp_sport != srv_port || - skel->bss->req_sk_sport != srv_port, - "Unexpected sk src port", - "listen_tp_sport:%u req_sk_sport:%u expected:%u\n", - skel->bss->listen_tp_sport, skel->bss->req_sk_sport, - srv_port)) + if (CHECK(skel->bss->listen_tp_sport != srv_port, + "Unexpected listen tp src port", + "listen_tp_sport:%u expected:%u\n", + skel->bss->listen_tp_sport, srv_port)) goto done; - if (CHECK(skel->bss->gen_cookie || skel->bss->recv_cookie, - "Unexpected syncookie states", - "gen_cookie:%u recv_cookie:%u\n", - skel->bss->gen_cookie, skel->bss->recv_cookie)) - goto done; + if (!gen_cookies) { + if (CHECK(skel->bss->req_sk_sport != srv_port, + "Unexpected req_sk src port", + "req_sk_sport:%u expected:%u\n", + skel->bss->req_sk_sport, srv_port)) + goto done; + if (CHECK(skel->bss->gen_cookie || skel->bss->recv_cookie, + "Unexpected syncookie states", + "gen_cookie:%u recv_cookie:%u\n", + skel->bss->gen_cookie, skel->bss->recv_cookie)) + goto done; + } else { + if (CHECK(skel->bss->req_sk_sport, + "Unexpected req_sk src port", + "req_sk_sport:%u expected:0\n", + skel->bss->req_sk_sport)) + goto done; + if (CHECK(!skel->bss->gen_cookie || + skel->bss->gen_cookie != skel->bss->recv_cookie, + "Unexpected syncookie states", + "gen_cookie:%u recv_cookie:%u\n", + skel->bss->gen_cookie, skel->bss->recv_cookie)) + goto done; + } CHECK(skel->bss->linum, "bpf prog detected error", "at line %u\n", skel->bss->linum); @@ -125,64 +143,14 @@ static void test_conn(void) close(srv_fd); } -static void test_syncookie(void) +static void test_conn(void) { - int listen_fd = -1, cli_fd = -1, srv_fd = -1, err; - socklen_t addrlen = sizeof(srv_sa6); - int srv_port; - - /* Enforce syncookie mode */ - if (write_sysctl("/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syncookies", "2")) - return; - - listen_fd = start_server(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, "::1", 0, 0); - if (CHECK_FAIL(listen_fd == -1)) - return; - - err = getsockname(listen_fd, (struct sockaddr *)&srv_sa6, &addrlen); - if (CHECK(err, "getsockname(listen_fd)", "err:%d errno:%d\n", err, - errno)) - goto done; - memcpy(&skel->bss->srv_sa6, &srv_sa6, sizeof(srv_sa6)); - srv_port = ntohs(srv_sa6.sin6_port); - - cli_fd = connect_to_fd(listen_fd, 0); - if (CHECK_FAIL(cli_fd == -1)) - goto done; - - srv_fd = accept(listen_fd, NULL, NULL); - if (CHECK_FAIL(srv_fd == -1)) - goto done; - - if (CHECK(skel->bss->listen_tp_sport != srv_port, - "Unexpected tp src port", - "listen_tp_sport:%u expected:%u\n", - skel->bss->listen_tp_sport, srv_port)) - goto done; - - if (CHECK(skel->bss->req_sk_sport, - "Unexpected req_sk src port", - "req_sk_sport:%u expected:0\n", - skel->bss->req_sk_sport)) - goto done; - - if (CHECK(!skel->bss->gen_cookie || - skel->bss->gen_cookie != skel->bss->recv_cookie, - "Unexpected syncookie states", - "gen_cookie:%u recv_cookie:%u\n", - skel->bss->gen_cookie, skel->bss->recv_cookie)) - goto done; - - CHECK(skel->bss->linum, "bpf prog detected error", "at line %u\n", - skel->bss->linum); + run_test(false); +} -done: - if (listen_fd != -1) - close(listen_fd); - if (cli_fd != -1) - close(cli_fd); - if (srv_fd != -1) - close(srv_fd); +static void test_syncookie(void) +{ + run_test(true); } struct test {