From patchwork Thu Oct 17 08:06:04 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Namhyung Kim X-Patchwork-Id: 13839588 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C04D1D6DBE; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 08:06:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729152367; cv=none; b=MfBrSqz7ORhlmXs4Hu0tOAfQ2Rc3LcWIcDhBe/RgR3ol3DSuYVq1pOs600ntvvorSKmK94BZm6jRatLoTNpmmimAP4YbLyRcJuRH7OaMFNIn84e2jMtCQmU7RodxnyepNik6HE+CMUNPpLBODU3YszNFfAxtQEjJ0bPWAGR8GX4= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729152367; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yT8+3HibLytUwdjsKhrLp1hPXDVTvisDL7LIxziLei0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=dHD0xTk/ChBeHtXjKadZhiN+kccQ9HX9QSsJyNLQJt7sVPeMRMnlYPXmHZrtefYtvOaPtwE4r8uVEjTJxsgTwIp1avWC1Ky8z0cKWioUwpB5VG+9FEQbyEEsO0S4ninp9CigpwzkdTnqyMbB3Q8+jErkepF1uGYWmWYZFyIFLUA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=W7b8fumq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="W7b8fumq" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B419DC4CECD; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 08:06:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1729152366; bh=yT8+3HibLytUwdjsKhrLp1hPXDVTvisDL7LIxziLei0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=W7b8fumqVoqSkV7fsBqyP+/nbc0CsubJ4ryJu0S1h6SxTMOTt6thxyqZJnMt1bPCl +BGpQsGcCHm5sajQSMrVzZ/UFM/K+IDRS6QMBh4mlB9uIhVSkEFgDxdUtDwRrejHgB ZOpwBdP8TaR7z3tJ9fLZtn+rXMVolW/aSmyQmf2k7O36peSRsB7zBQdXYHx84g5ENh EOWx+hmxShGFDwm6Ougmx8zwVGqXca1yjW4feQC1i+jLmgALSmeA92gXEUKSor8rjH bS+JeVGYvPFMWXWSqPEUaOOqvzo5/SveIa9K8QCEEwS3iPYl1ImIHKlvNIDcR4zdaG hqxIczeyKBw0Q== From: Namhyung Kim To: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko Cc: Martin KaFai Lau , Eduard Zingerman , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , LKML , bpf@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , Vlastimil Babka , Roman Gushchin , Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Kees Cook Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add a test for open coded kmem_cache iter Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 01:06:04 -0700 Message-ID: <20241017080604.541872-2-namhyung@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.0.rc1.288.g06298d1525-goog In-Reply-To: <20241017080604.541872-1-namhyung@kernel.org> References: <20241017080604.541872-1-namhyung@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net The new subtest is attached to sleepable fentry of syncfs() syscall. It iterates the kmem_cache using bpf_for_each loop and count the number of entries. Finally it checks it with the number of entries from the regular iterator. $ ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t kmem_cache_iter ... #130/1 kmem_cache_iter/check_task_struct:OK #130/2 kmem_cache_iter/check_slabinfo:OK #130/3 kmem_cache_iter/open_coded_iter:OK #130 kmem_cache_iter:OK Summary: 1/3 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Also simplify the code by using attach routine of the skeleton. Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim --- .../testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h | 6 ++++ .../bpf/prog_tests/kmem_cache_iter.c | 28 +++++++++++-------- .../selftests/bpf/progs/kmem_cache_iter.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h index b0668f29f7b394eb..cd8ecd39c3f3c68d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h @@ -582,4 +582,10 @@ extern int bpf_wq_set_callback_impl(struct bpf_wq *wq, unsigned int flags__k, void *aux__ign) __ksym; #define bpf_wq_set_callback(timer, cb, flags) \ bpf_wq_set_callback_impl(timer, cb, flags, NULL) + +struct bpf_iter_kmem_cache; +extern int bpf_iter_kmem_cache_new(struct bpf_iter_kmem_cache *it) __weak __ksym; +extern struct kmem_cache *bpf_iter_kmem_cache_next(struct bpf_iter_kmem_cache *it) __weak __ksym; +extern void bpf_iter_kmem_cache_destroy(struct bpf_iter_kmem_cache *it) __weak __ksym; + #endif diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kmem_cache_iter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kmem_cache_iter.c index 848d8fc9171fae45..a1fd3bc57c0b21bb 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kmem_cache_iter.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kmem_cache_iter.c @@ -68,12 +68,18 @@ static void subtest_kmem_cache_iter_check_slabinfo(struct kmem_cache_iter *skel) fclose(fp); } +static void subtest_kmem_cache_iter_open_coded(struct kmem_cache_iter *skel) +{ + /* To trigger the open coded iterator attached to the syscall */ + syncfs(0); + + /* It should be same as we've seen from the explicit iterator */ + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->open_coded_seen, skel->bss->kmem_cache_seen, "open_code_seen_eq"); +} + void test_kmem_cache_iter(void) { - DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_iter_attach_opts, opts); struct kmem_cache_iter *skel = NULL; - union bpf_iter_link_info linfo = {}; - struct bpf_link *link; char buf[256]; int iter_fd; @@ -81,16 +87,12 @@ void test_kmem_cache_iter(void) if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "kmem_cache_iter__open_and_load")) return; - opts.link_info = &linfo; - opts.link_info_len = sizeof(linfo); - - link = bpf_program__attach_iter(skel->progs.slab_info_collector, &opts); - if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_iter")) + if (!ASSERT_OK(kmem_cache_iter__attach(skel), "skel_attach")) goto destroy; - iter_fd = bpf_iter_create(bpf_link__fd(link)); + iter_fd = bpf_iter_create(bpf_link__fd(skel->links.slab_info_collector)); if (!ASSERT_GE(iter_fd, 0, "iter_create")) - goto free_link; + goto detach; memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf)); while (read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf) > 0)) { @@ -105,11 +107,13 @@ void test_kmem_cache_iter(void) subtest_kmem_cache_iter_check_task_struct(skel); if (test__start_subtest("check_slabinfo")) subtest_kmem_cache_iter_check_slabinfo(skel); + if (test__start_subtest("open_coded_iter")) + subtest_kmem_cache_iter_open_coded(skel); close(iter_fd); -free_link: - bpf_link__destroy(link); +detach: + kmem_cache_iter__detach(skel); destroy: kmem_cache_iter__destroy(skel); } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kmem_cache_iter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kmem_cache_iter.c index 72c9dafecd98406b..4c44aa279a5328fe 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kmem_cache_iter.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kmem_cache_iter.c @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@ /* Copyright (c) 2024 Google */ #include "bpf_iter.h" +#include "bpf_experimental.h" +#include "bpf_misc.h" #include #include @@ -33,6 +35,7 @@ extern struct kmem_cache *bpf_get_kmem_cache(u64 addr) __ksym; /* Result, will be checked by userspace */ int task_struct_found; int kmem_cache_seen; +int open_coded_seen; SEC("iter/kmem_cache") int slab_info_collector(struct bpf_iter__kmem_cache *ctx) @@ -85,3 +88,24 @@ int BPF_PROG(check_task_struct) task_struct_found = -2; return 0; } + +SEC("fentry.s/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_syncfs") +int open_coded_iter(const void *ctx) +{ + struct kmem_cache *s; + + bpf_for_each(kmem_cache, s) { + struct kmem_cache_result *r; + int idx = open_coded_seen; + + r = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&slab_result, &idx); + if (r == NULL) + break; + + open_coded_seen++; + + if (r->obj_size != s->size) + break; + } + return 0; +}