From patchwork Fri Oct 18 20:41:08 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jiri Olsa X-Patchwork-Id: 13842374 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72AEA2071FD; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 20:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729284227; cv=none; b=kbucgszDdPMIQ43VcMwsAEgBZztO+J8xEn/aH+fIEOyYLYhHDVuFTDcDAxAYQwQZDaLFPErppgsNHnFrqWHOiaG5ZcmDCZyO5ZN93ikNN1BJ2K6ANRYxD4madHjlyniGjUAGD8Amumde+Twds4BmkhbJhNGSpjpPCKXz5IsdKts= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729284227; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SRJ7iIqpFdc57svkJVfVWiyC4I6Wo1VBhjnyzeaFXpg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=uJWs0tewPg5dh555sNvVJ4pOEN7gCEbzSiZRi2z3kpHkkb/qxjhanVJFDV1Nw/mKtq4cg7L28ZvzxwQc4uVeVEJRqSL1G/HcyuL3sLNVn9t22uujXkpj+33ynMQNiNhkb6LqLKbTKAIiUKre/eQER+OYp7FStvLj5pdPeziy0DI= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=CqFxPx2D; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="CqFxPx2D" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E3E3C4CEC5; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 20:43:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1729284227; bh=SRJ7iIqpFdc57svkJVfVWiyC4I6Wo1VBhjnyzeaFXpg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CqFxPx2D/DHSYVsSN9Pu1y5oUu4HCBCmqWdOq2JnOTompR1Tg76p/T2rxIBuB3JLS hFZAgsRIyVjZY6dUp97kNQ/+0G575G0HUQBY0aOA5FwBpRUGmPEIh4N7d0AsaiK8Jr y+CCdBf+cRkb2a+LxiS7o06mV/ZbRNRzXdibC7B/3Hbwbuey9vF9zpEOJLByafTnjC u9ZEkmHUyZ/InvDkOi4QdxgnLv6q2EeCnOFr1faTLdkUMzHzHS6oaY5Ziir13zHg9l 8q0STCIiau8ePa3sVGMoJ3NrKPMGW9GGYnCwttn8qp+SBZ3oAc4/vHtq2BO8T1fZOC Y/173ZRz2e5Fw== From: Jiri Olsa To: Oleg Nesterov , Peter Zijlstra , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo , Steven Rostedt , Masami Hiramatsu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCHv8 bpf-next 12/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe sessions to consumer test Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 22:41:08 +0200 Message-ID: <20241018204109.713820-13-jolsa@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.46.2 In-Reply-To: <20241018204109.713820-1-jolsa@kernel.org> References: <20241018204109.713820-1-jolsa@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Adding uprobe session consumers to the consumer test, so we get the session into the test mix. In addition scaling down the test to have just 1 uprobe and 1 uretprobe, otherwise the test time grows and is unsuitable for CI even with threads. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa --- .../bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c | 68 +++++++++++++------ .../bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_consumers.c | 6 +- 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c index 7e0228f8fcfc..e96b153a0f5d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c @@ -799,10 +799,13 @@ static int uprobe_attach(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel, int idx) return -1; /* - * bit/prog: 0,1 uprobe entry - * bit/prog: 2,3 uprobe return + * bit/prog: 0 uprobe entry + * bit/prog: 1 uprobe return + * bit/prog: 2 uprobe session without return + * bit/prog: 3 uprobe session with return */ - opts.retprobe = idx == 2 || idx == 3; + opts.retprobe = idx == 1; + opts.session = idx == 2 || idx == 3; *link = bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(prog, 0, "/proc/self/exe", "uprobe_consumer_test", @@ -867,29 +870,55 @@ static int consumer_test(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel, goto cleanup; for (idx = 0; idx < 4; idx++) { + unsigned long had_uretprobes; const char *fmt = "BUG"; __u64 val = 0; - if (idx < 2) { + switch (idx) { + case 0: /* * uprobe entry * +1 if define in 'before' */ if (test_bit(idx, before)) val++; - fmt = "prog 0/1: uprobe"; - } else { + fmt = "prog 0: uprobe"; + break; + case 1: /* * to trigger uretprobe consumer, the uretprobe needs to be installed, * which means one of the 'return' uprobes was alive when probe was hit: * - * idxs: 2/3 uprobe return in 'installed' mask + * idxs: 1/2 uprobe return in 'installed' mask */ - unsigned long had_uretprobes = before & 0b1100; /* is uretprobe installed */ + had_uretprobes = before & 0b0110; /* is uretprobe installed */ if (had_uretprobes && test_bit(idx, after)) val++; - fmt = "idx 2/3: uretprobe"; + fmt = "prog 1: uretprobe"; + break; + case 2: + /* + * session with return + * +1 if defined in 'before' + * +1 if defined in 'after' + */ + if (test_bit(idx, before)) { + val++; + if (test_bit(idx, after)) + val++; + } + fmt = "prog 2: session with return"; + break; + case 3: + /* + * session without return + * +1 if defined in 'before' + */ + if (test_bit(idx, before)) + val++; + fmt = "prog 3: session with NO return"; + break; } if (!ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->uprobe_result[idx], val, fmt)) @@ -918,8 +947,10 @@ static void test_consumers(void) * The idea of this test is to try all possible combinations of * uprobes consumers attached on single function. * - * - 2 uprobe entry consumer - * - 2 uprobe exit consumers + * - 1 uprobe entry consumer + * - 1 uprobe exit consumer + * - 1 uprobe session with return + * - 1 uprobe session without return * * The test uses 4 uprobes attached on single function, but that * translates into single uprobe with 4 consumers in kernel. @@ -927,25 +958,24 @@ static void test_consumers(void) * The before/after values present the state of attached consumers * before and after the probed function: * - * bit/prog 0,1 : uprobe entry - * bit/prog 2,3 : uprobe return + * bit/prog 0 : uprobe entry + * bit/prog 1 : uprobe return * * For example for: * - * before = 0b0101 - * after = 0b0110 + * before = 0b01 + * after = 0b10 * * it means that before we call 'uprobe_consumer_test' we attach * uprobes defined in 'before' value: * - * - bit/prog 0: uprobe entry - * - bit/prog 2: uprobe return + * - bit/prog 1: uprobe entry * * uprobe_consumer_test is called and inside it we attach and detach * uprobes based on 'after' value: * - * - bit/prog 0: stays untouched - * - bit/prog 2: uprobe return is detached + * - bit/prog 0: is detached + * - bit/prog 1: is attached * * uprobe_consumer_test returns and we check counters values increased * by bpf programs on each uprobe to match the expected count based on diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_consumers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_consumers.c index 7e0fdcbbd242..93752bb5690b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_consumers.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_consumers.c @@ -24,16 +24,16 @@ int uprobe_1(struct pt_regs *ctx) return 0; } -SEC("uprobe.multi") +SEC("uprobe.session") int uprobe_2(struct pt_regs *ctx) { uprobe_result[2]++; return 0; } -SEC("uprobe.multi") +SEC("uprobe.session") int uprobe_3(struct pt_regs *ctx) { uprobe_result[3]++; - return 0; + return 1; }