diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v2,1/6] selftests/bpf: factorize conn and syncookies tests in a single runner

Message ID 20241020-syncookie-v2-1-2db240225fed@bootlin.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 6414b3e5d5d44cd214161abf2ce2221d9e9de7bf
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series selftests/bpf: integrate test_tcp_check_syncookie.sh into test_progs | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 5 this patch: 5
netdev/build_tools success Errors and warnings before: 0 (+1) this patch: 0 (+1)
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 17 of 17 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 5 this patch: 5
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 3 this patch: 3
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 133 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc

Commit Message

Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) Oct. 20, 2024, 7:22 p.m. UTC 
btf_skc_cls_ingress currently describe two tests, both running a simple
tcp server and then initializing a connection to it. The sole difference
between the tests is about the tcp_syncookie configuration, and some
checks around this feature being enabled/disabled.

Share the common code between those two tests by moving the code into a
single runner, parameterized by a "gen_cookies" argument. Split the
performed checks accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_skc_cls_ingress.c | 106 +++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_skc_cls_ingress.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_skc_cls_ingress.c
index ef4d6a3ae4231b250f43f8f93eeca6499abeaadc..5d8d7736edc095b647ca3fbc12cac0440b60140e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_skc_cls_ingress.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_skc_cls_ingress.c
@@ -71,13 +71,14 @@  static void print_err_line(void)
 		printf("bpf prog error at line %u\n", skel->bss->linum);
 }
 
-static void test_conn(void)
+static void run_test(bool gen_cookies)
 {
+	const char *tcp_syncookies = gen_cookies ? "2" : "1";
 	int listen_fd = -1, cli_fd = -1, srv_fd = -1, err;
 	socklen_t addrlen = sizeof(srv_sa6);
 	int srv_port;
 
-	if (write_sysctl("/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syncookies", "1"))
+	if (write_sysctl("/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syncookies", tcp_syncookies))
 		return;
 
 	listen_fd = start_server(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, "::1", 0, 0);
@@ -99,19 +100,36 @@  static void test_conn(void)
 	if (CHECK_FAIL(srv_fd == -1))
 		goto done;
 
-	if (CHECK(skel->bss->listen_tp_sport != srv_port ||
-		  skel->bss->req_sk_sport != srv_port,
-		  "Unexpected sk src port",
-		  "listen_tp_sport:%u req_sk_sport:%u expected:%u\n",
-		  skel->bss->listen_tp_sport, skel->bss->req_sk_sport,
-		  srv_port))
+	if (CHECK(skel->bss->listen_tp_sport != srv_port,
+		  "Unexpected listen tp src port",
+		  "listen_tp_sport:%u expected:%u\n",
+		  skel->bss->listen_tp_sport, srv_port))
 		goto done;
 
-	if (CHECK(skel->bss->gen_cookie || skel->bss->recv_cookie,
-		  "Unexpected syncookie states",
-		  "gen_cookie:%u recv_cookie:%u\n",
-		  skel->bss->gen_cookie, skel->bss->recv_cookie))
-		goto done;
+	if (!gen_cookies) {
+		if (CHECK(skel->bss->req_sk_sport != srv_port,
+			  "Unexpected req_sk src port",
+			  "req_sk_sport:%u expected:%u\n",
+			  skel->bss->req_sk_sport, srv_port))
+			goto done;
+		if (CHECK(skel->bss->gen_cookie || skel->bss->recv_cookie,
+			  "Unexpected syncookie states",
+			  "gen_cookie:%u recv_cookie:%u\n",
+			  skel->bss->gen_cookie, skel->bss->recv_cookie))
+			goto done;
+	} else {
+		if (CHECK(skel->bss->req_sk_sport,
+			  "Unexpected req_sk src port",
+			  "req_sk_sport:%u expected:0\n",
+			  skel->bss->req_sk_sport))
+			goto done;
+		if (CHECK(!skel->bss->gen_cookie ||
+			  skel->bss->gen_cookie != skel->bss->recv_cookie,
+			  "Unexpected syncookie states",
+			  "gen_cookie:%u recv_cookie:%u\n",
+			  skel->bss->gen_cookie, skel->bss->recv_cookie))
+			goto done;
+	}
 
 	CHECK(skel->bss->linum, "bpf prog detected error", "at line %u\n",
 	      skel->bss->linum);
@@ -125,64 +143,14 @@  static void test_conn(void)
 		close(srv_fd);
 }
 
-static void test_syncookie(void)
+static void test_conn(void)
 {
-	int listen_fd = -1, cli_fd = -1, srv_fd = -1, err;
-	socklen_t addrlen = sizeof(srv_sa6);
-	int srv_port;
-
-	/* Enforce syncookie mode */
-	if (write_sysctl("/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syncookies", "2"))
-		return;
-
-	listen_fd = start_server(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, "::1", 0, 0);
-	if (CHECK_FAIL(listen_fd == -1))
-		return;
-
-	err = getsockname(listen_fd, (struct sockaddr *)&srv_sa6, &addrlen);
-	if (CHECK(err, "getsockname(listen_fd)", "err:%d errno:%d\n", err,
-		  errno))
-		goto done;
-	memcpy(&skel->bss->srv_sa6, &srv_sa6, sizeof(srv_sa6));
-	srv_port = ntohs(srv_sa6.sin6_port);
-
-	cli_fd = connect_to_fd(listen_fd, 0);
-	if (CHECK_FAIL(cli_fd == -1))
-		goto done;
-
-	srv_fd = accept(listen_fd, NULL, NULL);
-	if (CHECK_FAIL(srv_fd == -1))
-		goto done;
-
-	if (CHECK(skel->bss->listen_tp_sport != srv_port,
-		  "Unexpected tp src port",
-		  "listen_tp_sport:%u expected:%u\n",
-		  skel->bss->listen_tp_sport, srv_port))
-		goto done;
-
-	if (CHECK(skel->bss->req_sk_sport,
-		  "Unexpected req_sk src port",
-		  "req_sk_sport:%u expected:0\n",
-		   skel->bss->req_sk_sport))
-		goto done;
-
-	if (CHECK(!skel->bss->gen_cookie ||
-		  skel->bss->gen_cookie != skel->bss->recv_cookie,
-		  "Unexpected syncookie states",
-		  "gen_cookie:%u recv_cookie:%u\n",
-		  skel->bss->gen_cookie, skel->bss->recv_cookie))
-		goto done;
-
-	CHECK(skel->bss->linum, "bpf prog detected error", "at line %u\n",
-	      skel->bss->linum);
+	run_test(false);
+}
 
-done:
-	if (listen_fd != -1)
-		close(listen_fd);
-	if (cli_fd != -1)
-		close(cli_fd);
-	if (srv_fd != -1)
-		close(srv_fd);
+static void test_syncookie(void)
+{
+	run_test(true);
 }
 
 struct test {