diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v2,3/4] selftests/bpf: Migrate BPF_CGROUP_INET_SOCK_CREATE test cases to prog_tests

Message ID 20241022152913.574836-4-jrife@google.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit af522f13e9177eca0111562a38cc8ebb6d55f820
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series Retire test_sock.c | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 5 this patch: 5
netdev/build_tools success Errors and warnings before: 0 (+1) this patch: 0 (+1)
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 4 maintainers not CCed: kpsingh@kernel.org haoluo@google.com shuah@kernel.org jolsa@kernel.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 5 this patch: 5
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 3 this patch: 3
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: line length of 87 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Jordan Rife Oct. 22, 2024, 3:29 p.m. UTC 
Move the "load w/o expected_attach_type" test case to
prog_tests/sock_create.c and drop the remaining test case, as it is made
redundant with the existing coverage inside prog_tests/sock_create.c.

Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_create.c    | 35 +++++++++++++------
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c       | 28 ---------------
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_create.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_create.c
index 17a3713621dd..187ffc5e60c4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_create.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_create.c
@@ -237,6 +237,19 @@  static struct sock_create_test {
 
 		.error = DENY_CREATE,
 	},
+	{
+		.descr = "load w/o expected_attach_type (compat mode)",
+		.insns = {
+			/* return 1 */
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.expected_attach_type = 0,
+		.attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_INET_SOCK_CREATE,
+
+		.domain = AF_INET,
+		.type = SOCK_STREAM,
+	},
 };
 
 static int load_prog(const struct bpf_insn *insns,
@@ -291,16 +304,18 @@  static int run_test(int cgroup_fd, struct sock_create_test *test)
 		goto detach_prog;
 	}
 
-	err = getsockopt(sock_fd, SOL_SOCKET, test->optname, &optval, &optlen);
-	if (err) {
-		log_err("Failed to call getsockopt");
-		goto cleanup;
-	}
-
-	if (optval != test->optval) {
-		errno = 0;
-		log_err("getsockopt returned unexpected optval");
-		goto cleanup;
+	if (test->optname) {
+		err = getsockopt(sock_fd, SOL_SOCKET, test->optname, &optval, &optlen);
+		if (err) {
+			log_err("Failed to call getsockopt");
+			goto cleanup;
+		}
+
+		if (optval != test->optval) {
+			errno = 0;
+			log_err("getsockopt returned unexpected optval");
+			goto cleanup;
+		}
 	}
 
 	ret = test->error != OK;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c
index 26dff88abbaa..f97850f1d84a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c
@@ -47,34 +47,6 @@  struct sock_test {
 };
 
 static struct sock_test tests[] = {
-	{
-		.descr = "sock_create load w/o expected_attach_type (compat mode)",
-		.insns = {
-			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
-			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-		},
-		.expected_attach_type = 0,
-		.attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_INET_SOCK_CREATE,
-		.domain = AF_INET,
-		.type = SOCK_STREAM,
-		.ip = "127.0.0.1",
-		.port = 8097,
-		.result = SUCCESS,
-	},
-	{
-		.descr = "sock_create load w/ expected_attach_type",
-		.insns = {
-			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
-			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-		},
-		.expected_attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_INET_SOCK_CREATE,
-		.attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_INET_SOCK_CREATE,
-		.domain = AF_INET,
-		.type = SOCK_STREAM,
-		.ip = "127.0.0.1",
-		.port = 8097,
-		.result = SUCCESS,
-	},
 };
 
 static size_t probe_prog_length(const struct bpf_insn *fp)