diff mbox series

[net,v2] net: wwan: t7xx: Fix off-by-one error in t7xx_dpmaif_rx_buf_alloc()

Message ID 20241029125600.3036659-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series [net,v2] net: wwan: t7xx: Fix off-by-one error in t7xx_dpmaif_rx_buf_alloc() | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag present in non-next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 5 this patch: 5
netdev/build_tools success No tools touched, skip
netdev/cc_maintainers fail 1 blamed authors not CCed: ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com; 5 maintainers not CCed: ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org matthias.bgg@gmail.com linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 3 this patch: 3
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 4 this patch: 4
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 18 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/contest success net-next-2024-10-31--09-00 (tests: 779)

Commit Message

Jinjie Ruan Oct. 29, 2024, 12:56 p.m. UTC
The error path in t7xx_dpmaif_rx_buf_alloc(), free and unmap the already
allocated and mapped skb in a loop, but the loop condition terminates when
the index reaches zero, which fails to free the first allocated skb at
index zero.

Check for >= 0 so that skb at index 0 is freed as well.

Fixes: d642b012df70 ("net: wwan: t7xx: Add data path interface")
Suggested-by: Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
---
v2:
- Update the commit title.
- Declare i as signed to avoid the endless loop.
---
 drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_dpmaif_rx.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Sergey Ryazanov Oct. 30, 2024, 4:01 p.m. UTC | #1
On October 29, 2024 2:56:00 PM, Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> wrote:
>The error path in t7xx_dpmaif_rx_buf_alloc(), free and unmap the already
>allocated and mapped skb in a loop, but the loop condition terminates when
>the index reaches zero, which fails to free the first allocated skb at
>index zero.
>
>Check for >= 0 so that skb at index 0 is freed as well.
>
>Fixes: d642b012df70 ("net: wwan: t7xx: Add data path interface")
>Suggested-by: Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com>
>Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>

Jakub, when applying, could you drop that suggested-by tag, please. My contribution was only a small suggestion to avoid an endless loop. In all other meanings this patch is original work made by Jinjie, and all creds should go to him.

Besides that tag:

Acked-by: Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com>

>---
>v2:
>- Update the commit title.
>- Declare i as signed to avoid the endless loop.
>---
> drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_dpmaif_rx.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_dpmaif_rx.c b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_dpmaif_rx.c
>index 210d84c67ef9..45e7833965b1 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_dpmaif_rx.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_dpmaif_rx.c
>@@ -166,8 +166,8 @@ int t7xx_dpmaif_rx_buf_alloc(struct dpmaif_ctrl *dpmaif_ctrl,
> 			     const unsigned int q_num, const unsigned int buf_cnt,
> 			     const bool initial)
> {
>-	unsigned int i, bat_cnt, bat_max_cnt, bat_start_idx;
>-	int ret;
>+	unsigned int bat_cnt, bat_max_cnt, bat_start_idx;
>+	int ret, i;
> 
> 	if (!buf_cnt || buf_cnt > bat_req->bat_size_cnt)
> 		return -EINVAL;
>@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ int t7xx_dpmaif_rx_buf_alloc(struct dpmaif_ctrl *dpmaif_ctrl,
> 	return 0;
> 
> err_unmap_skbs:
>-	while (--i > 0)
>+	while (--i >= 0)
> 		t7xx_unmap_bat_skb(dpmaif_ctrl->dev, bat_req->bat_skb, i);
> 
> 	return ret;
Jakub Kicinski Nov. 1, 2024, 2:16 a.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 18:01:07 +0200 Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
> On October 29, 2024 2:56:00 PM, Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> wrote:
> >The error path in t7xx_dpmaif_rx_buf_alloc(), free and unmap the already
> >allocated and mapped skb in a loop, but the loop condition terminates when
> >the index reaches zero, which fails to free the first allocated skb at
> >index zero.
> >
> >Check for >= 0 so that skb at index 0 is freed as well.
> >
> >Fixes: d642b012df70 ("net: wwan: t7xx: Add data path interface")
> >Suggested-by: Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com>
> >Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>  
> 
> Jakub, when applying, could you drop that suggested-by tag, please.
> My contribution was only a small suggestion to avoid an endless loop.
> In all other meanings this patch is original work made by Jinjie, and
> all creds should go to him.

TBH I find the while (i--) solution suggested by Ilpo more idiomatic,
too, let's do a v3 with that and without unnecessary Suggested-by tags.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_dpmaif_rx.c b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_dpmaif_rx.c
index 210d84c67ef9..45e7833965b1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_dpmaif_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_dpmaif_rx.c
@@ -166,8 +166,8 @@  int t7xx_dpmaif_rx_buf_alloc(struct dpmaif_ctrl *dpmaif_ctrl,
 			     const unsigned int q_num, const unsigned int buf_cnt,
 			     const bool initial)
 {
-	unsigned int i, bat_cnt, bat_max_cnt, bat_start_idx;
-	int ret;
+	unsigned int bat_cnt, bat_max_cnt, bat_start_idx;
+	int ret, i;
 
 	if (!buf_cnt || buf_cnt > bat_req->bat_size_cnt)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@  int t7xx_dpmaif_rx_buf_alloc(struct dpmaif_ctrl *dpmaif_ctrl,
 	return 0;
 
 err_unmap_skbs:
-	while (--i > 0)
+	while (--i >= 0)
 		t7xx_unmap_bat_skb(dpmaif_ctrl->dev, bat_req->bat_skb, i);
 
 	return ret;