Message ID | 20241105072642.898710-6-lulu@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Headers | show |
Series | vhost: Add support of kthread API | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
netdev/tree_selection | success | Not a local patch |
On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 3:27 PM Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com> wrote: > > The function vhost_worker_queue() uses vhost_task_fn and > selects the different mode based on the value of inherit_owner. > > Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com> > --- > drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 7 ++++++- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c > index 603b146fccc1..8b7ddfb33c61 100644 > --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c > @@ -238,13 +238,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_poll_stop); > static void vhost_worker_queue(struct vhost_worker *worker, > struct vhost_work *work) > { > + if (!worker && !worker->fn) > + return; > + > if (!test_and_set_bit(VHOST_WORK_QUEUED, &work->flags)) { > /* We can only add the work to the list after we're > * sure it was not in the list. > * test_and_set_bit() implies a memory barrier. > */ > llist_add(&work->node, &worker->work_list); > - vhost_task_wake(worker->vtsk); > + worker->fn->wakeup(worker->dev->inherit_owner ? > + (void *)worker->vtsk : > + (void *)worker->task); Logically, it looks better to introduce the ops before introducing back the kthread behaviour? Thanks > } > } > > -- > 2.45.0 >
Hi Cindy, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Cindy-Lu/vhost-Add-a-new-parameter-to-allow-user-select-kthread/20241105-153254 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git linux-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241105072642.898710-6-lulu%40redhat.com patch subject: [PATCH v3 5/9] vhost: Add kthread support in function vhost_worker_queue() config: x86_64-randconfig-161-20241106 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241107/202411071251.tQLG8K6C-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202411071251.tQLG8K6C-lkp@intel.com/ New smatch warnings: drivers/vhost/vhost.c:241 vhost_worker_queue() error: we previously assumed 'worker' could be null (see line 241) Old smatch warnings: drivers/vhost/vhost.c:311 vhost_dev_flush() warn: iterator 'i' not incremented drivers/vhost/vhost.c:678 vhost_attach_cgroups() error: uninitialized symbol 'ret'. drivers/vhost/vhost.c:673 vhost_attach_cgroups() warn: iterator 'i' not incremented vim +/worker +241 drivers/vhost/vhost.c 228a27cf78afc63 Mike Christie 2023-06-26 238 static void vhost_worker_queue(struct vhost_worker *worker, 0921dddcb589803 Mike Christie 2023-06-26 239 struct vhost_work *work) 3a4d5c94e959359 Michael S. Tsirkin 2010-01-14 240 { 001268765c12bbf Cindy Lu 2024-11-05 @241 if (!worker && !worker->fn) || was intended instead of &&. 001268765c12bbf Cindy Lu 2024-11-05 242 return; 001268765c12bbf Cindy Lu 2024-11-05 243 04b96e5528ca971 Jason Wang 2016-04-25 244 if (!test_and_set_bit(VHOST_WORK_QUEUED, &work->flags)) { 04b96e5528ca971 Jason Wang 2016-04-25 245 /* We can only add the work to the list after we're 04b96e5528ca971 Jason Wang 2016-04-25 246 * sure it was not in the list. 635abf01918157e Peng Tao 2016-12-07 247 * test_and_set_bit() implies a memory barrier. 04b96e5528ca971 Jason Wang 2016-04-25 248 */ 0921dddcb589803 Mike Christie 2023-06-26 249 llist_add(&work->node, &worker->work_list); 001268765c12bbf Cindy Lu 2024-11-05 250 worker->fn->wakeup(worker->dev->inherit_owner ? 001268765c12bbf Cindy Lu 2024-11-05 251 (void *)worker->vtsk : 001268765c12bbf Cindy Lu 2024-11-05 252 (void *)worker->task); 3a4d5c94e959359 Michael S. Tsirkin 2010-01-14 253 } ac9fde2474d04bd Qin Chuanyu 2013-06-07 254 }
On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 01:38:56PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Hi Cindy, > > kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: > > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] > > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Cindy-Lu/vhost-Add-a-new-parameter-to-allow-user-select-kthread/20241105-153254 > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git linux-next > patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241105072642.898710-6-lulu%40redhat.com > patch subject: [PATCH v3 5/9] vhost: Add kthread support in function vhost_worker_queue() > config: x86_64-randconfig-161-20241106 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241107/202411071251.tQLG8K6C-lkp@intel.com/config) > compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99) > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > | Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202411071251.tQLG8K6C-lkp@intel.com/ > > New smatch warnings: > drivers/vhost/vhost.c:241 vhost_worker_queue() error: we previously assumed 'worker' could be null (see line 241) > I only meant to send this warning. > Old smatch warnings: > drivers/vhost/vhost.c:311 vhost_dev_flush() warn: iterator 'i' not incremented > drivers/vhost/vhost.c:678 vhost_attach_cgroups() error: uninitialized symbol 'ret'. > drivers/vhost/vhost.c:673 vhost_attach_cgroups() warn: iterator 'i' not incremented > Not these. I need to fix these for systems without the cross function DB... #embarassing. regards, dan carpenter
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c index 603b146fccc1..8b7ddfb33c61 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c @@ -238,13 +238,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_poll_stop); static void vhost_worker_queue(struct vhost_worker *worker, struct vhost_work *work) { + if (!worker && !worker->fn) + return; + if (!test_and_set_bit(VHOST_WORK_QUEUED, &work->flags)) { /* We can only add the work to the list after we're * sure it was not in the list. * test_and_set_bit() implies a memory barrier. */ llist_add(&work->node, &worker->work_list); - vhost_task_wake(worker->vtsk); + worker->fn->wakeup(worker->dev->inherit_owner ? + (void *)worker->vtsk : + (void *)worker->task); } }
The function vhost_worker_queue() uses vhost_task_fn and selects the different mode based on the value of inherit_owner. Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com> --- drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)