diff mbox series

[net,14/14] can: mcp251xfd: mcp251xfd_get_tef_len(): work around erratum DS80000789E 6.

Message ID 20241129122722.1046050-15-mkl@pengutronix.de (mailing list archive)
State New
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series [net,01/14] can: dev: can_set_termination(): allow sleeping GPIOs | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format success Pull request is its own cover letter
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag present in non-next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 3 this patch: 3
netdev/build_tools success No tools touched, skip
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 3 maintainers not CCed: mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org thomas.kopp@microchip.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 3 this patch: 3
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 304 this patch: 304
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 41 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline fail Was 0 now: 1
netdev/contest warning net-next-2024-11-29--18-00 (tests: 761)

Commit Message

Marc Kleine-Budde Nov. 29, 2024, 12:17 p.m. UTC
Commit b8e0ddd36ce9 ("can: mcp251xfd: tef: prepare to workaround
broken TEF FIFO tail index erratum") introduced
mcp251xfd_get_tef_len() to get the number of unhandled transmit events
from the Transmit Event FIFO (TEF).

As the TEF has no head index, the driver uses the TX-FIFO's tail index
instead, assuming that send frames are completed.

When calculating the number of unhandled TEF events, that commit
didn't take mcp2518fd erratum DS80000789E 6. into account. According
to that erratum, the FIFOCI bits of a FIFOSTA register, here the
TX-FIFO tail index might be corrupted.

However here it seems the bit indicating that the TX-FIFO is
empty (MCP251XFD_REG_FIFOSTA_TFERFFIF) is not correct while the
TX-FIFO tail index is.

Assume that the TX-FIFO is indeed empty if:
- Chip's head and tail index are equal (len == 0).
- The TX-FIFO is less than half full.
  (The TX-FIFO empty case has already been checked at the
   beginning of this function.)
- No free buffers in the TX ring.

If the TX-FIFO is assumed to be empty, assume that the TEF is full and
return the number of elements in the TX-FIFO (which equals the number
of TEF elements).

If these assumptions are false, the driver might read to many objects
from the TEF. mcp251xfd_handle_tefif_one() checks the sequence numbers
and will refuse to process old events.

Reported-by: Renjaya Raga Zenta <renjaya.zenta@formulatrix.com>
Closes: https://patch.msgid.link/CAJ7t6HgaeQ3a_OtfszezU=zB-FqiZXqrnATJ3UujNoQJJf7GgA@mail.gmail.com
Fixes: b8e0ddd36ce9 ("can: mcp251xfd: tef: prepare to workaround broken TEF FIFO tail index erratum")
Tested-by: Renjaya Raga Zenta <renjaya.zenta@formulatrix.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241126-mcp251xfd-fix-length-calculation-v2-1-c2ed516ed6ba@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
---
 drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-tef.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-tef.c b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-tef.c
index d3ac865933fd..e94321849fd7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-tef.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-tef.c
@@ -21,6 +21,11 @@  static inline bool mcp251xfd_tx_fifo_sta_empty(u32 fifo_sta)
 	return fifo_sta & MCP251XFD_REG_FIFOSTA_TFERFFIF;
 }
 
+static inline bool mcp251xfd_tx_fifo_sta_less_than_half_full(u32 fifo_sta)
+{
+	return fifo_sta & MCP251XFD_REG_FIFOSTA_TFHRFHIF;
+}
+
 static inline int
 mcp251xfd_tef_tail_get_from_chip(const struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv,
 				 u8 *tef_tail)
@@ -147,7 +152,29 @@  mcp251xfd_get_tef_len(struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv, u8 *len_p)
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(tx_ring->obj_num) != sizeof(len));
 
 	len = (chip_tx_tail << shift) - (tail << shift);
-	*len_p = len >> shift;
+	len >>= shift;
+
+	/* According to mcp2518fd erratum DS80000789E 6. the FIFOCI
+	 * bits of a FIFOSTA register, here the TX-FIFO tail index
+	 * might be corrupted.
+	 *
+	 * However here it seems the bit indicating that the TX-FIFO
+	 * is empty (MCP251XFD_REG_FIFOSTA_TFERFFIF) is not correct
+	 * while the TX-FIFO tail index is.
+	 *
+	 * We assume the TX-FIFO is empty, i.e. all pending CAN frames
+	 * haven been send, if:
+	 * - Chip's head and tail index are equal (len == 0).
+	 * - The TX-FIFO is less than half full.
+	 *   (The TX-FIFO empty case has already been checked at the
+	 *    beginning of this function.)
+	 * - No free buffers in the TX ring.
+	 */
+	if (len == 0 && mcp251xfd_tx_fifo_sta_less_than_half_full(fifo_sta) &&
+	    mcp251xfd_get_tx_free(tx_ring) == 0)
+		len = tx_ring->obj_num;
+
+	*len_p = len;
 
 	return 0;
 }