diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v6,5/7] bpf: Improve verifier log for resource leak on exit

Message ID 20241204030400.208005-6-memxor@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit cbd8730aea8d79cda6b0f3c18b406dfdef0c1b80
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series IRQ save/restore | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (sched_ext, false, 360) / sched_ext on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (sched_ext, false, 360) / sched_ext on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (sched_ext, false, 360) / sched_ext on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (sched_ext, false, 360) / sched_ext on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-44 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-45 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-43 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/build_tools success Errors and warnings before: 0 (+0) this patch: 0 (+0)
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 11 maintainers not CCed: sdf@fomichev.me haoluo@google.com kpsingh@kernel.org john.fastabend@gmail.com shuah@kernel.org martin.lau@linux.dev linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org jolsa@kernel.org yonghong.song@linux.dev song@kernel.org mykolal@fb.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 11 this patch: 11
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: line length of 102 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 104 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 98 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi Dec. 4, 2024, 3:03 a.m. UTC 
The verifier log when leaking resources on BPF_EXIT may be a bit
confusing, as it's a problem only when finally existing from the main
prog, not from any of the subprogs. Hence, update the verifier error
string and the corresponding selftests matching on it.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c                              |  2 +-
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/exceptions_fail.c  |  4 ++--
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/preempt_lock.c   | 14 +++++++-------
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spin_lock.c       |  2 +-
 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index b23f6fddf3af..31e0d33498ac 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -19102,7 +19102,7 @@  static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 				 * match caller reference state when it exits.
 				 */
 				err = check_resource_leak(env, exception_exit, !env->cur_state->curframe,
-							  "BPF_EXIT instruction");
+							  "BPF_EXIT instruction in main prog");
 				if (err)
 					return err;
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/exceptions_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/exceptions_fail.c
index fe0f3fa5aab6..8a0fdff89927 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/exceptions_fail.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/exceptions_fail.c
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@  int reject_subprog_with_lock(void *ctx)
 }
 
 SEC("?tc")
-__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction cannot be used inside bpf_rcu_read_lock-ed region")
+__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction in main prog cannot be used inside bpf_rcu_read_lock-ed region")
 int reject_with_rcu_read_lock(void *ctx)
 {
 	bpf_rcu_read_lock();
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@  __noinline static int throwing_subprog(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
 }
 
 SEC("?tc")
-__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction cannot be used inside bpf_rcu_read_lock-ed region")
+__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction in main prog cannot be used inside bpf_rcu_read_lock-ed region")
 int reject_subprog_with_rcu_read_lock(void *ctx)
 {
 	bpf_rcu_read_lock();
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/preempt_lock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/preempt_lock.c
index 885377e83607..5269571cf7b5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/preempt_lock.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/preempt_lock.c
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ 
 #include "bpf_experimental.h"
 
 SEC("?tc")
-__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction cannot be used inside bpf_preempt_disable-ed region")
+__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction in main prog cannot be used inside bpf_preempt_disable-ed region")
 int preempt_lock_missing_1(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
 {
 	bpf_preempt_disable();
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@  int preempt_lock_missing_1(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
 }
 
 SEC("?tc")
-__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction cannot be used inside bpf_preempt_disable-ed region")
+__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction in main prog cannot be used inside bpf_preempt_disable-ed region")
 int preempt_lock_missing_2(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
 {
 	bpf_preempt_disable();
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@  int preempt_lock_missing_2(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
 }
 
 SEC("?tc")
-__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction cannot be used inside bpf_preempt_disable-ed region")
+__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction in main prog cannot be used inside bpf_preempt_disable-ed region")
 int preempt_lock_missing_3(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
 {
 	bpf_preempt_disable();
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@  int preempt_lock_missing_3(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
 }
 
 SEC("?tc")
-__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction cannot be used inside bpf_preempt_disable-ed region")
+__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction in main prog cannot be used inside bpf_preempt_disable-ed region")
 int preempt_lock_missing_3_minus_2(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
 {
 	bpf_preempt_disable();
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@  static __noinline void preempt_enable(void)
 }
 
 SEC("?tc")
-__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction cannot be used inside bpf_preempt_disable-ed region")
+__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction in main prog cannot be used inside bpf_preempt_disable-ed region")
 int preempt_lock_missing_1_subprog(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
 {
 	preempt_disable();
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@  int preempt_lock_missing_1_subprog(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
 }
 
 SEC("?tc")
-__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction cannot be used inside bpf_preempt_disable-ed region")
+__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction in main prog cannot be used inside bpf_preempt_disable-ed region")
 int preempt_lock_missing_2_subprog(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
 {
 	preempt_disable();
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@  int preempt_lock_missing_2_subprog(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
 }
 
 SEC("?tc")
-__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction cannot be used inside bpf_preempt_disable-ed region")
+__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction in main prog cannot be used inside bpf_preempt_disable-ed region")
 int preempt_lock_missing_2_minus_1_subprog(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
 {
 	preempt_disable();
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spin_lock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spin_lock.c
index 3f679de73229..25599eac9a70 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spin_lock.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spin_lock.c
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@  l0_%=:	r6 = r0;					\
 
 SEC("cgroup/skb")
 __description("spin_lock: test6 missing unlock")
-__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction cannot be used inside bpf_spin_lock-ed region")
+__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction in main prog cannot be used inside bpf_spin_lock-ed region")
 __failure_unpriv __msg_unpriv("")
 __naked void spin_lock_test6_missing_unlock(void)
 {