diff mbox series

[6.1.y] net/mlx5e: Don't call cleanup on profile rollback failure

Message ID 20241211100953.2069964-1-jianqi.ren.cn@windriver.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series [6.1.y] net/mlx5e: Don't call cleanup on profile rollback failure | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Guessing tree name failed - patch did not apply

Commit Message

jianqi.ren.cn@windriver.com Dec. 11, 2024, 10:09 a.m. UTC
From: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>

[ Upstream commit 4dbc1d1a9f39c3711ad2a40addca04d07d9ab5d0 ]

When profile rollback fails in mlx5e_netdev_change_profile, the netdev
profile var is left set to NULL. Avoid a crash when unloading the driver
by not calling profile->cleanup in such a case.

This was encountered while testing, with the original trigger that
the wq rescuer thread creation got interrupted (presumably due to
Ctrl+C-ing modprobe), which gets converted to ENOMEM (-12) by
mlx5e_priv_init, the profile rollback also fails for the same reason
(signal still active) so the profile is left as NULL, leading to a crash
later in _mlx5e_remove.

 [  732.473932] mlx5_core 0000:08:00.1: E-Switch: Unload vfs: mode(OFFLOADS), nvfs(2), necvfs(0), active vports(2)
 [  734.525513] workqueue: Failed to create a rescuer kthread for wq "mlx5e": -EINTR
 [  734.557372] mlx5_core 0000:08:00.1: mlx5e_netdev_init_profile:6235:(pid 6086): mlx5e_priv_init failed, err=-12
 [  734.559187] mlx5_core 0000:08:00.1 eth3: mlx5e_netdev_change_profile: new profile init failed, -12
 [  734.560153] workqueue: Failed to create a rescuer kthread for wq "mlx5e": -EINTR
 [  734.589378] mlx5_core 0000:08:00.1: mlx5e_netdev_init_profile:6235:(pid 6086): mlx5e_priv_init failed, err=-12
 [  734.591136] mlx5_core 0000:08:00.1 eth3: mlx5e_netdev_change_profile: failed to rollback to orig profile, -12
 [  745.537492] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008
 [  745.538222] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
<snipped>
 [  745.551290] Call Trace:
 [  745.551590]  <TASK>
 [  745.551866]  ? __die+0x20/0x60
 [  745.552218]  ? page_fault_oops+0x150/0x400
 [  745.555307]  ? exc_page_fault+0x79/0x240
 [  745.555729]  ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30
 [  745.556166]  ? mlx5e_remove+0x6b/0xb0 [mlx5_core]
 [  745.556698]  auxiliary_bus_remove+0x18/0x30
 [  745.557134]  device_release_driver_internal+0x1df/0x240
 [  745.557654]  bus_remove_device+0xd7/0x140
 [  745.558075]  device_del+0x15b/0x3c0
 [  745.558456]  mlx5_rescan_drivers_locked.part.0+0xb1/0x2f0 [mlx5_core]
 [  745.559112]  mlx5_unregister_device+0x34/0x50 [mlx5_core]
 [  745.559686]  mlx5_uninit_one+0x46/0xf0 [mlx5_core]
 [  745.560203]  remove_one+0x4e/0xd0 [mlx5_core]
 [  745.560694]  pci_device_remove+0x39/0xa0
 [  745.561112]  device_release_driver_internal+0x1df/0x240
 [  745.561631]  driver_detach+0x47/0x90
 [  745.562022]  bus_remove_driver+0x84/0x100
 [  745.562444]  pci_unregister_driver+0x3b/0x90
 [  745.562890]  mlx5_cleanup+0xc/0x1b [mlx5_core]
 [  745.563415]  __x64_sys_delete_module+0x14d/0x2f0
 [  745.563886]  ? kmem_cache_free+0x1b0/0x460
 [  745.564313]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xe2/0x190
 [  745.564825]  do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140
 [  745.565223]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
 [  745.565725] RIP: 0033:0x7f1579b1288b

Fixes: 3ef14e463f6e ("net/mlx5e: Separate between netdev objects and mlx5e profiles initialization")
Signed-off-by: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jianqi Ren <jianqi.ren.cn@windriver.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Greg KH Dec. 11, 2024, 9:18 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 06:09:53PM +0800, jianqi.ren.cn@windriver.com wrote:
> From: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>
> 
> [ Upstream commit 4dbc1d1a9f39c3711ad2a40addca04d07d9ab5d0 ]

Please note that we can not apply a commit to an older stable tree that
is NOT in newer ones as you would obviously have a regression when
moving to a newer kernel.

I am guessing that you are being tasked with backporting CVE fixes to
older stable kernels, which is great, but please work "down the release
list" by starting with the newest one, and then moving to the older
ones.  Otherwise we just can't take these and you are causing a lot of
extra review/checking time on our side here to verify you are doing it
all correctly :(

thanks,

greg k-h
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
index 385904502a6b..8ee6a81b42b4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
@@ -5980,7 +5980,9 @@  static void mlx5e_remove(struct auxiliary_device *adev)
 	mlx5e_dcbnl_delete_app(priv);
 	unregister_netdev(priv->netdev);
 	mlx5e_suspend(adev, state);
-	priv->profile->cleanup(priv);
+	/* Avoid cleanup if profile rollback failed. */
+	if (priv->profile)
+		priv->profile->cleanup(priv);
 	mlx5e_devlink_port_unregister(priv);
 	mlx5e_destroy_netdev(priv);
 }