diff mbox series

[net-next,01/27] sock: deduplicate ->sk_wmem_alloc check

Message ID 2ba680102bcbdb9f0165aef89c41a43c9ada03c6.1648981570.git.asml.silence@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Deferred
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series net and/or udp optimisations | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net-next, async
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/patch_count fail Series longer than 15 patches (and no cover letter)
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 6 this patch: 6
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 1 maintainers not CCed: pabeni@redhat.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 6 this patch: 6
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 17 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Pavel Begunkov April 3, 2022, 1:06 p.m. UTC
The main ->sk_wmem_alloc check in sock_def_write_space() almost
completely repeats sock_writeable() apart from small differences like
rounding, so we should be able to replace the first check and remove
extra sock_writeable().

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
---
 net/core/sock.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 1180a0cb0110..f5766d6e27cb 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -3174,15 +3174,14 @@  static void sock_def_write_space(struct sock *sk)
 	/* Do not wake up a writer until he can make "significant"
 	 * progress.  --DaveM
 	 */
-	if ((refcount_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc) << 1) <= READ_ONCE(sk->sk_sndbuf)) {
+	if (sock_writeable(sk)) {
 		wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq);
 		if (skwq_has_sleeper(wq))
 			wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&wq->wait, EPOLLOUT |
 						EPOLLWRNORM | EPOLLWRBAND);
 
 		/* Should agree with poll, otherwise some programs break */
-		if (sock_writeable(sk))
-			sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT);
+		sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT);
 	}
 
 	rcu_read_unlock();