diff mbox series

i40e: Remove useless DMA-32 fallback configuration

Message ID 5549ec8837b3a6fab83e92c5206cc100ffd23d85.1641748468.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series i40e: Remove useless DMA-32 fallback configuration | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix warning Target tree name not specified in the subject
netdev/cover_letter success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 6 of 6 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 43 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/tree_selection success Guessing tree name failed - patch did not apply

Commit Message

Christophe JAILLET Jan. 9, 2022, 5:14 p.m. UTC
As stated in [1], dma_set_mask() with a 64-bit mask never fails if
dev->dma_mask is non-NULL.
So, if it fails, the 32 bits case will also fail for the same reason.

So, if dma_set_mask_and_coherent() succeeds, 'pci_using_dac' is known to be
1.

Simplify code and remove some dead code accordingly.

[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/7/398

Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 22 +++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

Comments

Christophe JAILLET Jan. 9, 2022, 5:30 p.m. UTC | #1
Le 09/01/2022 à 18:14, Christophe JAILLET a écrit :
> As stated in [1], dma_set_mask() with a 64-bit mask never fails if
> dev->dma_mask is non-NULL.
> So, if it fails, the 32 bits case will also fail for the same reason.
> 
> So, if dma_set_mask_and_coherent() succeeds, 'pci_using_dac' is known to be
> 1.
> 
> Simplify code and remove some dead code accordingly.
> 
> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/7/398
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 22 +++++++---------------
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

NAK, wrong subject

CJ
G, GurucharanX Jan. 13, 2022, 5:50 p.m. UTC | #2
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org> On Behalf Of
> Christophe JAILLET
> Sent: Sunday, January 9, 2022 10:45 PM
> To: Brandeburg, Jesse <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>; Nguyen, Anthony L
> <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>; David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>;
> Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; Christophe JAILLET
> <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>; intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org; Christoph
> Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] i40e: Remove useless DMA-32 fallback
> configuration
> 
> As stated in [1], dma_set_mask() with a 64-bit mask never fails if
> dev->dma_mask is non-NULL.
> So, if it fails, the 32 bits case will also fail for the same reason.
> 
> So, if dma_set_mask_and_coherent() succeeds, 'pci_using_dac' is known to
> be 1.
> 
> Simplify code and remove some dead code accordingly.
> 
> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/7/398
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 22 +++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 

Tested-by: Gurucharan G <gurucharanx.g@intel.com> (A Contingent worker at Intel)
G, GurucharanX Jan. 13, 2022, 6:33 p.m. UTC | #3
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org> On Behalf Of
> Christophe JAILLET
> Sent: Sunday, January 9, 2022 10:45 PM
> To: Brandeburg, Jesse <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>; Nguyen, Anthony L
> <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>; David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>;
> Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; Christophe JAILLET
> <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>; intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org; Christoph
> Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] i40e: Remove useless DMA-32 fallback
> configuration
> 
> As stated in [1], dma_set_mask() with a 64-bit mask never fails if
> dev->dma_mask is non-NULL.
> So, if it fails, the 32 bits case will also fail for the same reason.
> 
> So, if dma_set_mask_and_coherent() succeeds, 'pci_using_dac' is known to
> be 1.
> 
> Simplify code and remove some dead code accordingly.
> 
> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/7/398
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 22 +++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 

Tested-by: Gurucharan G <gurucharanx.g@intel.com> (A Contingent worker at Intel)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
index 635a95927e93..4f6ee5c44f75 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
@@ -7385,9 +7385,9 @@  static int e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 	resource_size_t flash_start, flash_len;
 	static int cards_found;
 	u16 aspm_disable_flag = 0;
-	int bars, i, err, pci_using_dac;
 	u16 eeprom_data = 0;
 	u16 eeprom_apme_mask = E1000_EEPROM_APME;
+	int bars, i, err;
 	s32 ret_val = 0;
 
 	if (ei->flags2 & FLAG2_DISABLE_ASPM_L0S)
@@ -7401,17 +7401,11 @@  static int e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	pci_using_dac = 0;
 	err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
-	if (!err) {
-		pci_using_dac = 1;
-	} else {
-		err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
-		if (err) {
-			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
-				"No usable DMA configuration, aborting\n");
-			goto err_dma;
-		}
+	if (err) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev,
+			"No usable DMA configuration, aborting\n");
+		goto err_dma;
 	}
 
 	bars = pci_select_bars(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM);
@@ -7547,10 +7541,8 @@  static int e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 
 	netdev->priv_flags |= IFF_UNICAST_FLT;
 
-	if (pci_using_dac) {
-		netdev->features |= NETIF_F_HIGHDMA;
-		netdev->vlan_features |= NETIF_F_HIGHDMA;
-	}
+	netdev->features |= NETIF_F_HIGHDMA;
+	netdev->vlan_features |= NETIF_F_HIGHDMA;
 
 	/* MTU range: 68 - max_hw_frame_size */
 	netdev->min_mtu = ETH_MIN_MTU;