@@ -1623,7 +1623,36 @@ void release_sock(struct sock *sk);
SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING)
#define bh_unlock_sock(__sk) spin_unlock(&((__sk)->sk_lock.slock))
-bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) __acquires(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
+bool __lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) __acquires(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
+
+/**
+ * lock_sock_fast - fast version of lock_sock
+ * @sk: socket
+ *
+ * This version should be used for very small section, where process wont block
+ * return false if fast path is taken:
+ *
+ * sk_lock.slock locked, owned = 0, BH disabled
+ *
+ * return true if slow path is taken:
+ *
+ * sk_lock.slock unlocked, owned = 1, BH enabled
+ */
+static inline bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk)
+{
+ /* The sk_lock has mutex_lock() semantics here. */
+ mutex_acquire(&sk->sk_lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
+
+ return __lock_sock_fast(sk);
+}
+
+/* fast socket lock variant for caller already holding a [different] socket lock */
+static inline bool lock_sock_fast_nested(struct sock *sk)
+{
+ mutex_acquire(&sk->sk_lock.dep_map, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING, 0, _RET_IP_);
+
+ return __lock_sock_fast(sk);
+}
/**
* unlock_sock_fast - complement of lock_sock_fast
@@ -3210,24 +3210,8 @@ void release_sock(struct sock *sk)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_sock);
-/**
- * lock_sock_fast - fast version of lock_sock
- * @sk: socket
- *
- * This version should be used for very small section, where process wont block
- * return false if fast path is taken:
- *
- * sk_lock.slock locked, owned = 0, BH disabled
- *
- * return true if slow path is taken:
- *
- * sk_lock.slock unlocked, owned = 1, BH enabled
- */
-bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) __acquires(&sk->sk_lock.slock)
+bool __lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) __acquires(&sk->sk_lock.slock)
{
- /* The sk_lock has mutex_lock() semantics here. */
- mutex_acquire(&sk->sk_lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
-
might_sleep();
spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
@@ -3256,7 +3240,7 @@ bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) __acquires(&sk->sk_lock.slock)
spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
return true;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(lock_sock_fast);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__lock_sock_fast);
int sock_gettstamp(struct socket *sock, void __user *userstamp,
bool timeval, bool time32)
@@ -2735,7 +2735,7 @@ static void mptcp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
inet_csk(sk)->icsk_mtup.probe_timestamp = tcp_jiffies32;
mptcp_for_each_subflow(mptcp_sk(sk), subflow) {
struct sock *ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
- bool slow = lock_sock_fast(ssk);
+ bool slow = lock_sock_fast_nested(ssk);
sock_orphan(ssk);
unlock_sock_fast(ssk, slow);
Syzkaller reported a false positive deadlock involving the nl socket lock and the subflow socket lock: MPTCP: kernel_bind error, err=-98 ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 5.15.0-rc1-syzkaller #0 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- syz-executor998/6520 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880795718a0 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_close+0x267/0x7b0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2738 but task is already holding lock: ffff8880787c8c60 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1612 [inline] ffff8880787c8c60 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_close+0x23/0x7b0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2720 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(k-sk_lock-AF_INET); lock(k-sk_lock-AF_INET); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 3 locks held by syz-executor998/6520: #0: ffffffff8d176c50 (cb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv+0x15/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:802 #1: ffffffff8d176d08 (genl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: genl_lock net/netlink/genetlink.c:33 [inline] #1: ffffffff8d176d08 (genl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv_msg+0x3e0/0x580 net/netlink/genetlink.c:790 #2: ffff8880787c8c60 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1612 [inline] #2: ffff8880787c8c60 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_close+0x23/0x7b0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2720 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 6520 Comm: syz-executor998 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc1-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_deadlock_bug kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2944 [inline] check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2987 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3776 [inline] __lock_acquire.cold+0x149/0x3ab kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5625 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5590 lock_sock_fast+0x36/0x100 net/core/sock.c:3229 mptcp_close+0x267/0x7b0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2738 inet_release+0x12e/0x280 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:431 __sock_release net/socket.c:649 [inline] sock_release+0x87/0x1b0 net/socket.c:677 mptcp_pm_nl_create_listen_socket+0x238/0x2c0 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:900 mptcp_nl_cmd_add_addr+0x359/0x930 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:1170 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x228/0x320 net/netlink/genetlink.c:731 genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:775 [inline] genl_rcv_msg+0x328/0x580 net/netlink/genetlink.c:792 netlink_rcv_skb+0x153/0x420 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2504 genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:803 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1314 [inline] netlink_unicast+0x533/0x7d0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1340 netlink_sendmsg+0x86d/0xdb0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1929 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:704 [inline] sock_sendmsg+0xcf/0x120 net/socket.c:724 sock_no_sendpage+0x101/0x150 net/core/sock.c:2980 kernel_sendpage.part.0+0x1a0/0x340 net/socket.c:3504 kernel_sendpage net/socket.c:3501 [inline] sock_sendpage+0xe5/0x140 net/socket.c:1003 pipe_to_sendpage+0x2ad/0x380 fs/splice.c:364 splice_from_pipe_feed fs/splice.c:418 [inline] __splice_from_pipe+0x43e/0x8a0 fs/splice.c:562 splice_from_pipe fs/splice.c:597 [inline] generic_splice_sendpage+0xd4/0x140 fs/splice.c:746 do_splice_from fs/splice.c:767 [inline] direct_splice_actor+0x110/0x180 fs/splice.c:936 splice_direct_to_actor+0x34b/0x8c0 fs/splice.c:891 do_splice_direct+0x1b3/0x280 fs/splice.c:979 do_sendfile+0xae9/0x1240 fs/read_write.c:1249 __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1314 [inline] __se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1300 [inline] __x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1cc/0x210 fs/read_write.c:1300 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f215cb69969 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 14 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 c0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffc96bb3868 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000028 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f215cbad072 RCX: 00007f215cb69969 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007ffc96bb3a08 R09: 00007ffc96bb3a08 R10: 0000000100000002 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffc96bb387c R13: 431bde82d7b634db R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 the problem originates from uncorrect lock annotation in the mptcp code and is only visible since commit 2dcb96bacce3 ("net: core: Correct the sock::sk_lock.owned lockdep annotations"), but is present since the port-based endpoint support initial implementation. This patch addresses the issue introducing a nested variant of lock_sock_fast() and using it in the relevant code path. Fixes: 1729cf186d8a ("mptcp: create the listening socket for new port") Fixes: 2dcb96bacce3 ("net: core: Correct the sock::sk_lock.owned lockdep annotations") Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+1dd53f7a89b299d59eaf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> --- include/net/sock.h | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- net/core/sock.c | 20 ++------------------ net/mptcp/protocol.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)