From patchwork Wed Sep 29 09:59:17 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Paolo Abeni X-Patchwork-Id: 12525183 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF265C433EF for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 10:00:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A8E60C41 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 10:00:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S245244AbhI2KBo (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Sep 2021 06:01:44 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:56965 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S245211AbhI2KBl (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Sep 2021 06:01:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1632909600; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CMt5cESAQqdqr3kE5ppHxwsk+SWy6HsnArTKU39z6eA=; b=XEppr9q+saNM12ic1Fgz781dVe0WnhaZZIOnIJ5fcw3Ic8E8GkSuQA+AUfHYHE59hskGys wag6uXOploe6PXlU9tZQe6MsWDCoAELiYG7lYfp10kpuwBa89q9lUbTYxWQ+oh+Wk5+1e5 7EL1bRPeFShb6IzG5Z3jCuK7ulIZFnU= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-320-aa-NocLDOIeE-qP4YDPgow-1; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 05:59:58 -0400 X-MC-Unique: aa-NocLDOIeE-qP4YDPgow-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D91E19067E1; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 09:59:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gerbillo.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.195.217]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F57660854; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 09:59:55 +0000 (UTC) From: Paolo Abeni To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , mptcp@lists.linux.dev, Thomas Gleixner , Eric Dumazet Subject: [PATCH net] net: introduce and use lock_sock_fast_nested() Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 11:59:17 +0200 Message-Id: <59164fda628b5169d2dac9ecf7e85d3d6f9690f5.1632909427.git.pabeni@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org Syzkaller reported a false positive deadlock involving the nl socket lock and the subflow socket lock: MPTCP: kernel_bind error, err=-98 ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 5.15.0-rc1-syzkaller #0 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- syz-executor998/6520 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880795718a0 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_close+0x267/0x7b0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2738 but task is already holding lock: ffff8880787c8c60 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1612 [inline] ffff8880787c8c60 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_close+0x23/0x7b0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2720 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(k-sk_lock-AF_INET); lock(k-sk_lock-AF_INET); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 3 locks held by syz-executor998/6520: #0: ffffffff8d176c50 (cb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv+0x15/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:802 #1: ffffffff8d176d08 (genl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: genl_lock net/netlink/genetlink.c:33 [inline] #1: ffffffff8d176d08 (genl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv_msg+0x3e0/0x580 net/netlink/genetlink.c:790 #2: ffff8880787c8c60 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1612 [inline] #2: ffff8880787c8c60 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_close+0x23/0x7b0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2720 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 6520 Comm: syz-executor998 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc1-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_deadlock_bug kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2944 [inline] check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2987 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3776 [inline] __lock_acquire.cold+0x149/0x3ab kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5625 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5590 lock_sock_fast+0x36/0x100 net/core/sock.c:3229 mptcp_close+0x267/0x7b0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2738 inet_release+0x12e/0x280 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:431 __sock_release net/socket.c:649 [inline] sock_release+0x87/0x1b0 net/socket.c:677 mptcp_pm_nl_create_listen_socket+0x238/0x2c0 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:900 mptcp_nl_cmd_add_addr+0x359/0x930 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:1170 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x228/0x320 net/netlink/genetlink.c:731 genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:775 [inline] genl_rcv_msg+0x328/0x580 net/netlink/genetlink.c:792 netlink_rcv_skb+0x153/0x420 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2504 genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:803 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1314 [inline] netlink_unicast+0x533/0x7d0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1340 netlink_sendmsg+0x86d/0xdb0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1929 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:704 [inline] sock_sendmsg+0xcf/0x120 net/socket.c:724 sock_no_sendpage+0x101/0x150 net/core/sock.c:2980 kernel_sendpage.part.0+0x1a0/0x340 net/socket.c:3504 kernel_sendpage net/socket.c:3501 [inline] sock_sendpage+0xe5/0x140 net/socket.c:1003 pipe_to_sendpage+0x2ad/0x380 fs/splice.c:364 splice_from_pipe_feed fs/splice.c:418 [inline] __splice_from_pipe+0x43e/0x8a0 fs/splice.c:562 splice_from_pipe fs/splice.c:597 [inline] generic_splice_sendpage+0xd4/0x140 fs/splice.c:746 do_splice_from fs/splice.c:767 [inline] direct_splice_actor+0x110/0x180 fs/splice.c:936 splice_direct_to_actor+0x34b/0x8c0 fs/splice.c:891 do_splice_direct+0x1b3/0x280 fs/splice.c:979 do_sendfile+0xae9/0x1240 fs/read_write.c:1249 __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1314 [inline] __se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1300 [inline] __x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1cc/0x210 fs/read_write.c:1300 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f215cb69969 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 14 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 c0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffc96bb3868 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000028 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f215cbad072 RCX: 00007f215cb69969 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007ffc96bb3a08 R09: 00007ffc96bb3a08 R10: 0000000100000002 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffc96bb387c R13: 431bde82d7b634db R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 the problem originates from uncorrect lock annotation in the mptcp code and is only visible since commit 2dcb96bacce3 ("net: core: Correct the sock::sk_lock.owned lockdep annotations"), but is present since the port-based endpoint support initial implementation. This patch addresses the issue introducing a nested variant of lock_sock_fast() and using it in the relevant code path. Fixes: 1729cf186d8a ("mptcp: create the listening socket for new port") Fixes: 2dcb96bacce3 ("net: core: Correct the sock::sk_lock.owned lockdep annotations") Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+1dd53f7a89b299d59eaf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner --- include/net/sock.h | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- net/core/sock.c | 20 ++------------------ net/mptcp/protocol.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h index c005c3c750e8..dc3f8169312e 100644 --- a/include/net/sock.h +++ b/include/net/sock.h @@ -1623,7 +1623,36 @@ void release_sock(struct sock *sk); SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING) #define bh_unlock_sock(__sk) spin_unlock(&((__sk)->sk_lock.slock)) -bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) __acquires(&sk->sk_lock.slock); +bool __lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) __acquires(&sk->sk_lock.slock); + +/** + * lock_sock_fast - fast version of lock_sock + * @sk: socket + * + * This version should be used for very small section, where process wont block + * return false if fast path is taken: + * + * sk_lock.slock locked, owned = 0, BH disabled + * + * return true if slow path is taken: + * + * sk_lock.slock unlocked, owned = 1, BH enabled + */ +static inline bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) +{ + /* The sk_lock has mutex_lock() semantics here. */ + mutex_acquire(&sk->sk_lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_); + + return __lock_sock_fast(sk); +} + +/* fast socket lock variant for caller already holding a [different] socket lock */ +static inline bool lock_sock_fast_nested(struct sock *sk) +{ + mutex_acquire(&sk->sk_lock.dep_map, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING, 0, _RET_IP_); + + return __lock_sock_fast(sk); +} /** * unlock_sock_fast - complement of lock_sock_fast diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c index 512e629f9780..7060d183216e 100644 --- a/net/core/sock.c +++ b/net/core/sock.c @@ -3210,24 +3210,8 @@ void release_sock(struct sock *sk) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_sock); -/** - * lock_sock_fast - fast version of lock_sock - * @sk: socket - * - * This version should be used for very small section, where process wont block - * return false if fast path is taken: - * - * sk_lock.slock locked, owned = 0, BH disabled - * - * return true if slow path is taken: - * - * sk_lock.slock unlocked, owned = 1, BH enabled - */ -bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) __acquires(&sk->sk_lock.slock) +bool __lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) __acquires(&sk->sk_lock.slock) { - /* The sk_lock has mutex_lock() semantics here. */ - mutex_acquire(&sk->sk_lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_); - might_sleep(); spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock); @@ -3256,7 +3240,7 @@ bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) __acquires(&sk->sk_lock.slock) spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock); return true; } -EXPORT_SYMBOL(lock_sock_fast); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__lock_sock_fast); int sock_gettstamp(struct socket *sock, void __user *userstamp, bool timeval, bool time32) diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c index dbcebf56798f..e5df0b5971c8 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c @@ -2735,7 +2735,7 @@ static void mptcp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout) inet_csk(sk)->icsk_mtup.probe_timestamp = tcp_jiffies32; mptcp_for_each_subflow(mptcp_sk(sk), subflow) { struct sock *ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow); - bool slow = lock_sock_fast(ssk); + bool slow = lock_sock_fast_nested(ssk); sock_orphan(ssk); unlock_sock_fast(ssk, slow);