diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v10,4/5] selftests/bpf: Drop unneeded checks for mptcp

Message ID 5eecd03fc0eaecc19da6a40bb118690971a8a7a7.1691113640.git.geliang.tang@suse.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: Force to MPTCP | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 1 maintainers not CCed: yonghong.song@linux.dev
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 17 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 fail Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Geliang Tang Aug. 4, 2023, 1:55 a.m. UTC 
Load success means prog_fd and map_fd are always valid. So drop these
unneeded ASSERT_GE checks for them in mptcp run_test().

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c | 10 ----------
 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)

Comments

Yonghong Song Aug. 4, 2023, 4:31 a.m. UTC | #1 
On 8/3/23 6:55 PM, Geliang Tang wrote:
> Load success means prog_fd and map_fd are always valid. So drop these
> unneeded ASSERT_GE checks for them in mptcp run_test().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
index 4407bd5c9e9a..3dc0ba2e7590 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
@@ -127,17 +127,7 @@  static int run_test(int cgroup_fd, int server_fd, bool is_mptcp)
 		goto out;
 
 	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(sock_skel->progs._sockops);
-	if (!ASSERT_GE(prog_fd, 0, "bpf_program__fd")) {
-		err = -EIO;
-		goto out;
-	}
-
 	map_fd = bpf_map__fd(sock_skel->maps.socket_storage_map);
-	if (!ASSERT_GE(map_fd, 0, "bpf_map__fd")) {
-		err = -EIO;
-		goto out;
-	}
-
 	err = bpf_prog_attach(prog_fd, cgroup_fd, BPF_CGROUP_SOCK_OPS, 0);
 	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_attach"))
 		goto out;