diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v2,3/6] selftests/bpf: Use ASSERT_OK to skip ENOTSUPP

Message ID 7206d2c0781535981c4ab9c7ec046da97a6d778c.1720146231.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series skip ENOTSUPP BPF selftests | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/build_tools success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 3 maintainers not CCed: martin.kelly@crowdstrike.com andrea.righi@canonical.com vmalik@redhat.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 48 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Geliang Tang July 5, 2024, 2:38 a.m. UTC 
From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>

There are so many "ENOTSUPP" (-524) errors when running BPF selftests
on a Loongarch platform since lacking BPF trampoline on Loongarch:

'''
 test_d_path_basic:PASS:setup 0 nsec
 libbpf: prog 'prog_stat': failed to attach: unknown error (-524)
 libbpf: prog 'prog_stat': failed to auto-attach: -524
 test_d_path_basic:FAIL:setup attach failed: -524
 #77/1    d_path/basic:FAIL
 #77/2    d_path/check_rdonly_mem:OK
 #77/3    d_path/check_alloc_mem:OK
 #77      d_path:FAIL
 ... ...
 test_module_attach:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec
 test_module_attach:PASS:set_attach_target 0 nsec
 test_module_attach:PASS:set_attach_target_explicit 0 nsec
 test_module_attach:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec
 libbpf: prog 'handle_fentry': failed to attach: unknown error (-524)
 libbpf: prog 'handle_fentry': failed to auto-attach: -524
 test_module_attach:FAIL:skel_attach skeleton attach failed: -524
 #167     module_attach:FAIL
 ... ...
 ringbuf_subtest:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec
 ringbuf_subtest:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec
 ringbuf_subtest:PASS:rw_cons_pos 0 nsec
 ringbuf_subtest:PASS:rw_extend 0 nsec
 ringbuf_subtest:PASS:exec_cons_pos_protect 0 nsec
 ringbuf_subtest:PASS:unmap_rw 0 nsec
 ringbuf_subtest:PASS:wr_prod_pos 0 nsec
 ringbuf_subtest:PASS:wr_prod_pos_err 0 nsec
 ringbuf_subtest:PASS:wr_data_page_one 0 nsec
 ringbuf_subtest:PASS:wr_data_page_one_err 0 nsec
 ringbuf_subtest:PASS:wr_data_page_two 0 nsec
 ringbuf_subtest:PASS:wr_data_page_all 0 nsec
 ringbuf_subtest:PASS:ro_prod_pos 0 nsec
 ringbuf_subtest:PASS:write_protect 0 nsec
 ringbuf_subtest:PASS:exec_protect 0 nsec
 ringbuf_subtest:PASS:ro_remap 0 nsec
 ringbuf_subtest:PASS:unmap_ro 0 nsec
 ringbuf_subtest:PASS:ro_prod_pos 0 nsec
 ringbuf_subtest:PASS:write_protect 0 nsec
 ringbuf_subtest:PASS:exec_protect 0 nsec
 ringbuf_subtest:PASS:ro_remap 0 nsec
 ringbuf_subtest:PASS:unmap_ro 0 nsec
 ringbuf_subtest:PASS:ringbuf_create 0 nsec
 ringbuf_subtest:FAIL:skel_attach skeleton attachment failed: -1
 #277/1   ringbuf/ringbuf:FAIL
 #277/2   ringbuf/ringbuf_n:SKIP
 #277/3   ringbuf/ringbuf_map_key:SKIP
 #277     ringbuf:FAIL
 ... ...
 test_test_bprm_opts:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec
 libbpf: prog 'secure_exec': failed to attach: unknown error (-524)
 libbpf: prog 'secure_exec': failed to auto-attach: -524
 test_test_bprm_opts:FAIL:attach attach failed: -524
 #382     test_bprm_opts:FAIL
 ... ...
 test_test_ima:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec
 test_test_ima:PASS:ringbuf 0 nsec
 libbpf: prog 'bprm_committed_creds': failed to attach: \
					unknown error (-524)
 libbpf: prog 'bprm_committed_creds': failed to auto-attach: -524
 test_test_ima:FAIL:attach attach failed: -524
 #384     test_ima:FAIL
 ... ...
 test_trace_ext:PASS:setup 0 nsec
 test_trace_ext:PASS:setup 0 nsec
 test_trace_ext:PASS:setup 0 nsec
 test_trace_ext:PASS:setup 0 nsec
 libbpf: prog 'test_pkt_md_access_new': failed to attach: \
					unknown error (-524)
 libbpf: prog 'test_pkt_md_access_new': failed to auto-attach: -524
 test_trace_ext:FAIL:setup freplace/test_pkt_md_access attach failed: -524
 #397     trace_ext:FAIL
'''

This patch uses ASSERT_OK() instead of CHECK() to skip these "ENOTSUPP"
errors. With this change, the new output of these selftests look like:

'''
 #77/1    d_path/basic:SKIP
 #77/2    d_path/check_rdonly_mem:OK
 #77/3    d_path/check_alloc_mem:OK
 #77      d_path:OK (SKIP: 1/3)
 ... ...
 #167     module_attach:SKIP
 ... ...
 #277/1   ringbuf/ringbuf:SKIP
 #277/2   ringbuf/ringbuf_n:SKIP
 #277/3   ringbuf/ringbuf_map_key:SKIP
 #277     ringbuf:SKIP
 ... ...
 #382     test_bprm_opts:SKIP
 ... ...
 #384     test_ima:SKIP
 ... ...
 #397     trace_ext:SKIP
'''

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/d_path.c         | 2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c  | 2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c        | 2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bprm_opts.c | 2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_ima.c       | 2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/trace_ext.c      | 2 +-
 6 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/d_path.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/d_path.c
index ccc768592e66..78110075b485 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/d_path.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/d_path.c
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@  static void test_d_path_basic(void)
 		goto cleanup;
 
 	err = test_d_path__attach(skel);
-	if (CHECK(err, "setup", "attach failed: %d\n", err))
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "setup"))
 		goto cleanup;
 
 	bss = skel->bss;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c
index 6d391d95f96e..4aab747ad202 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@  void test_module_attach(void)
 	bss = skel->bss;
 
 	err = test_module_attach__attach(skel);
-	if (CHECK(err, "skel_attach", "skeleton attach failed: %d\n", err))
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "skel_attach"))
 		goto cleanup;
 
 	/* trigger tracepoint */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c
index 4c6f42dae409..ee7deb76b60a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@  static void ringbuf_subtest(void)
 		goto cleanup;
 
 	err = test_ringbuf_lskel__attach(skel);
-	if (CHECK(err, "skel_attach", "skeleton attachment failed: %d\n", err))
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "skel_attach"))
 		goto cleanup;
 
 	trigger_samples();
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bprm_opts.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bprm_opts.c
index a0054019e677..40a86a303c1a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bprm_opts.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bprm_opts.c
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@  void test_test_bprm_opts(void)
 		goto close_prog;
 
 	err = bprm_opts__attach(skel);
-	if (CHECK(err, "attach", "attach failed: %d\n", err))
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "attach"))
 		goto close_prog;
 
 	/* Run the test with the secureexec bit unset */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_ima.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_ima.c
index 810b14981c2e..2a6c388fe29d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_ima.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_ima.c
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@  void test_test_ima(void)
 		goto close_prog;
 
 	err = ima__attach(skel);
-	if (CHECK(err, "attach", "attach failed: %d\n", err))
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "attach"))
 		goto close_prog;
 
 	measured_dir = mkdtemp(measured_dir_template);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/trace_ext.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/trace_ext.c
index aabdff7bea3e..d006c0b91178 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/trace_ext.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/trace_ext.c
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@  void test_trace_ext(void)
 	}
 
 	err = test_trace_ext__attach(skel_ext);
-	if (CHECK(err, "setup", "freplace/test_pkt_md_access attach failed: %d\n", err))
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "setup replace/test_pkt_md_access attach"))
 		goto cleanup;
 
 	prog = skel_ext->progs.test_pkt_md_access_new;